Evolving Trends and Gaps in Transit Accessibility Index Research in Asia: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v23i2.8920aKeywords:
Transit Accessibility Index, Transit Equity, Urban Mobility, Bibliometric Analysis, Public TransportationAbstract
Transit Accessibility Index (TAI) has become a key tool for evaluating how effectively public transport systems connect populations to essential opportunities in rapidly urbanising Asian cities. Despite increasing scholarly attention, existing studies remain fragmented, geographically concentrated, and methodologically constrained, limiting the development of context-sensitive and equity-oriented frameworks. This study addresses these limitations through a bibliometric analysis of TAI research in Asia from 2002 to 2024, based on 260 publications indexed in Scopus. The analysis examines publication trends, geographic distribution, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution. Results indicate significant growth in research output, reflecting the integration of accessibility into sustainable mobility and transit-oriented development agendas. However, research remains concentrated in a few countries, while collaboration is largely intra-national, limiting regional knowledge exchange. Thematic analysis reveals a strong focus on spatial accessibility and system performance, with limited attention to equity, informal mobility, and climate resilience. Although data-driven approaches are increasing, their application remains uneven. This study provides a systematic synthesis of TAI research in Asia and highlights the need for more inclusive, multidimensional, and context-sensitive accessibility frameworks to support sustainable urban planning.
References
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Farber, S., & Fu, L. (2017). Dynamic public transit accessibility using travel time cubes: Comparing the effects of infrastructure (dis) investments over time. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 62, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.005
Gebeyehu, M., & Takano, S. E. (2006). Application of logical planning model for public transport improvement programs in the city of Addis Ababa. Studies in Regional Science, 36(3), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.36.663
Gu, X., Tao, S., & Dai, B. (2017). Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.006
Guo, S., Pei, T., Wang, X., Song, C., Chen, X., Chen, J., Shu, H., Liu, Y., & Wu, M. (2022). Equity of subway accessibility: A perspective from work commute trips. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 113, 103515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103515
Hadi, W., Chrisnawati, Y., & Ikhsan, H. N. (2018). Public transportation accessibility: Towards sustainable transit oriented development (Case study: Depok Baru Station–Jakarta, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 202, 012012. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/202/1/012012
Kamada, M., Kitayuguchi, J., Inoue, S., Kamioka, H., Mutoh, Y., & Shiwaku, K. (2009). Environmental correlates of physical activity in driving and non-driving rural Japanese women. Preventive Medicine, 49(6), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.014
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
Leong, W. Y., Chong, W. W., & Kwok, M. (2024). Shifting travel patterns through narrative gamification: Evidence from a school-based program in Singapore. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 16, 101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101198
Malekzadeh, A., & Chung, E. (2020). A review of transit accessibility models: Challenges in developing transit accessibility models. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(10), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1625087
Mamun, S. A., Lownes, N. E., Osleeb, J. P., & Bertolaccini, K. (2013). A method to define public transit opportunity space. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.007
Monajem, S., & Nosratian, F. E. (2015). The evaluation of the spatial integration of station areas via the node place model; an application to subway station areas in Tehran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.009
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Naharudin, N., Ahamad, M. S., & Sadullah, A. F. (2017). Framework for developing a spatial walkability index (SWI) for the light-rail transit (LRT) stations in Kuala Lumpur city centre using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and GIS. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1892(1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005758
Satranarakun, A., & Kraiwanit, T. (2023). Rules and regulations for enhancing metro rail accessibility in a developing country. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 5(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i1p10
Shi, Y., Blainey, S., Sun, C., & Jing, P. (2020). A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques. Journal of Transport Geography, 87, 102810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102810
Uddin, M. A., Hoque, M. S., Tamanna, T., Adiba, S., Muniruzzaman, S. M., & Parvez, M. S. (2023). A framework to measure transit-oriented development around transit nodes: Case study of a mass rapid transit system in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0280275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280275
Wan, T., Lu, W., & Sun, P. (2023). Equity impacts of the built environment in urban rail transit station areas from a transit-oriented development perspective: A systematic review. Environmental Research Communications, 5(9), 092001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acf8b2
Wang, L., Cao, X., Li, T., & Gao, X. (2019). Accessibility comparison and spatial differentiation of Xi’an scenic spots with different modes based on Baidu real-time travel. Chinese Geographical Science, 29, 848–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1073-8
Zhai, X., Zhao, J., & Chen, Q. (2018). Analysis of the public transit accessibility in Changsha City, China, after the introduction of a subway network. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 32(32), 1850354. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797921850354X
Zhang, Q., Liu, C., Lu, L., Hu, J., & Chen, Y. (2024). Sustainability assessment of urban public transport for SDG using geospatial big data. Sustainability, 16(11), 4542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114542
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lutfi A. Rahaman, Nabilah Naharudin, Siti Aekbal Salleh, Elina Alias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International








