PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES (PLS) LATENT VARIABLE MODELLING APPROACH FOR MEASURING DURATION OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v5i1.7416Keywords:
Partial Least Squares, Orthodontic treatment, Variable Importance for Projection, Malocclusion, Treatment PlanningAbstract
In today's society, the quest for aesthetic perfection is no longer just an aspiration of the young. As a result, there is an increasing number of adult patients who seek for orthodontic treatment to improve not only the function but the appearance of their teeth as well. Patients who are going to wear braces will be curious on how long the orthodontic treatment will take and those who complete treatment on time may be more satisfied. Therefore, this retrospective study aims to model the factors that affect the duration of orthodontic treatment using Partial Least Squares Regression. Demographic profile, patient's severity of malocclusion, treatment planning and patient compliance data are collected from patient's folders who have completed orthodontic treatment. The result from Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression indicates that twelve variables which are patient's age, patient's gender, proposed treatment planning, seven malocclusion characteristics, clinician experience and oral hygiene condition significantly contribute to the treatment duration. This study also demonstrates the application of Variable Importance for Projection (VIP) to select significant predictor variables. The final PLS model with one extracted factor explains 89.96% of the variation in the duration of orthodontic treatment.
References
Elmassad, O. (2013). Predicting Customer Satisfaction from Dental Implants Perception Data (Doctoral dissertation).
Franklin, D. L., Luther, F., & Curzon, M. E. J. (1996). The prevalence of malocclusion in children with cerebral palsy. European Journal of Orthodontics, 18(6), 637-643.
Johansson, K., & Lundström, F. (2012). Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets A prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthodontist, 82(5), 929-934.
Keim, R. G., Gottlieb, E. L., Nelson, A. H., & Vogels 3rd, D. S. (2004). 2003 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study. Part 4: Additional breakdowns. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics: JCO, 38(1), 17.
Liao, D., & Valliant, R. (2012). Variance inflation factors in the analysis of complex survey data. Survey Methodology, 38(1), 53-62.
Mitchell, L. (2013). An introduction to orthodontics. Oxford University Press.
Mavreas, D., & Athanasiou, A. E. (2008). Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics, 30(4), 386-395.
Rhiel, M., Cohen, M. B., Murhammer, D. W., & Arnold, M. A. (2002). Nondestructive near‐infrared spectroscopic measurement of multiple analytes in undiluted samples of serum‐based cell culture media. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 77(1), 73-82.
Skidmore, K. J., Brook, K. J., Thomson, W. M., & Harding, W. J. (2006). Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 129(2), 230-238.
Wold, S. (1995). PLS for multivariate linear modeling in chemometric methods. Molecular Design Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry.
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001). PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 58: 109-130.
Zhang, Y. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of Global Health (Vol. 1). Sage.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nur Hanisah Abdul Malek, Haliza Hasan, Maryati Md Dasor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




