DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION TOOL FOR ASSESSING BIOGAS POTENTIAL OF ORGANIC WASTE MIXTURES

Authors

  • Nur Nabila Mohamed Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Farah Nurqismina Rozidi Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Yulianta Siregar Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Dedet Candra Riawan Department of Electrical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
  • Muldi Yuhendri Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v13i2.9851

Keywords:

Distillery and Fruit Vegetables Waste, Methane Yield, MATLAB, Anaerobic Digestion, Biogas

Abstract

Biogas production has become an increasingly important option for addressing the challenges particularly in organic waste management and renewable energy generation. While Anaerobic Digestion (AD) offers a sustainable waste-to-energy solution, optimising the co-digestion process of different substrates remains a challenge. Traditional methods for determining optimal feedstock ratios and operational parameters rely on laboratory-based experiments which are often resource intensive, time consuming, and costly. To address this limitation, this study presents a simplified MATLAB-based simulation tool designed to estimate methane yield without the need for complex kinetic parameters. The tool is designed for accessibility and utilises secondary experimental data to predict biogas potential cost-effectively. The simulation results demonstrated that the 75:25 (DW:FVW) mixture achieved the highest efficiency, recording a yield of 0.0791 L/gVS which is 26% improvement compared to mono-digestion of Fruit Waste. The results indicate that the tool effectively captures the synergistic effects of co-digestion, providing logical trends in methane production that is consistent with biological principles. By offering a user-friendly interface for rapid feasibility assessment, this tool serves as a decision support system for researchers and small-scale biogas operators which enables them to optimise waste management strategies without the need for complex equipment or extensive physical trials.

References

Adadi, R., Volkmer, B., Milo, R., Heinemann, M., & Shlomi, T. (2012). Prediction of microbial growth rate versus biomass yield by a metabolic network with kinetic parameters. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002575

Alengebawy, A., Ran, Y., Osman, A. I., Jin, K., Samer, M., & Ai, P. (2024). Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review. In Environmental Chemistry Letters (Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 2641–2668). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01789-1

Al-Iraqi, A. R., Gandhi, B. P., Folkard, A. M., Barker, P. A., & Semple, K. T. (2025). Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Phragmites australis: Influence of Grinding Process, Harvesting Season and Co-digestion with Food Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-025-03293-1

Depcik, C., & Assanis, D. (2005). Graphical user interfaces in an engineering educational environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 13, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20029

Di Maria, F., Sordi, A., Cirulli, G., & Micale, C. (2015). Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time. Applied Energy, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.146

Duguma, A., Bekele, T., & Geda, A. (2024). Biogas Production through Anaerobic Codigestion of Distillery Wastewater Sludge and Disposable Spent Yeast. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5510471

Farid, M. U., Olbert, I. A., Bück, A., Ghafoor, A., & Wu, G. (2025). CFD modelling and simulation of anaerobic digestion reactors for energy generation from organic wastes: A comprehensive review. In Heliyon (Vol. 11, Issue 2). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41911

Gebresilasie, G. G., Gebreslassie, M. G., & Gebresemati, M. (2025a). Comparative potential of biogas production from the distillery, fruit and vegetable waste and their mixtures (digestion). Heliyon, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42068

Gebresilasie, G. G., Gebreslassie, M. G., & Gebresemati, M. (2025b). Comparative potential of biogas production from the distillery, fruit and vegetable waste and their mixtures (digestion). Heliyon, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42068

Heiker, M., Kraume, M., Mertins, A., Wawer, T., & Rosenberger, S. (2021). Biogas plants in renewable energy systems—a systematic review of modeling approaches of biogas production. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 8). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083361

Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T., & Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. (2009). The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046

Induchoodan, T. G., Haq, I., & Kalamdhad, A. S. (2022). Factors affecting anaerobic digestion for biogas production: a review. Advanced Organic Waste Management: Sustainable Practices and Approaches, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85792-5.00020-4

Kalak, T. (2023). Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future. In Energies (Vol. 16, Issue 4). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041783

Karki, R., Chuenchart, W., Surendra, K. C., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Sung, S., Hashimoto, A., & Kumar Khanal, S. (2021). Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives. In Bioresource Technology (Vol. 330). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125001

Laiq Ur Rehman, M., Iqbal, A., Chang, C., Li, W., & Ju, M. (2019). Anaerobic digestion. Water Environment Research, 91(10), 1253–1271. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1219

Li, D., Lee, I., & Kim, H. (2021). Application of the linearized ADM1 (LADM) to lab-scale anaerobic digestion system. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105193

Li, Y., Chen, Z., Peng, Y., Huang, W., Liu, J., Mironov, V., & Zhang, S. (2022). Deeper insights into the effects of substrate to inoculum ratio selection on the relationship of kinetic parameters, microbial communities, and key metabolic pathways during the anaerobic digestion of food waste. Water Research, 217, 118440. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2022.118440

Mo, R., Guo, W., Batstone, D., Makinia, J., & Li, Y. (2024). Modeling with the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for Enhanced Understanding and Application of Anaerobic Treatment Processes (pp. 225–259). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69378-6_12

Najam, F., Khushnood, R., & Rizwan, S. (2016). Paradigms for Employing Interactive Computing Tools and Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) in Structural Engineering Problems. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2016.V6.853

Strazzera, G., Battista, F., Garcia, N. H., Frison, N., & Bolzonella, D. (2018). Volatile fatty acids production from food wastes for biorefinery platforms: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.039

Su’ait, M., Ludin, N., & Sopian, K. (2025). Introduction to Renewable Energy Technologies and Energy Transition Strategies (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2025-1499.ch001

Suhartini, S., Naraswati, A. S., & Nurika, I. (2021). Effect of mixture ratio on co-digestion of vegetable and fruit waste with macro-algae, chicken manure and tofu dregs. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 733(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/733/1/012140

Tg, I., Haq, I., & Kalamdhad, A. (2022). Factors affecting anaerobic digestion for biogas production: a review (pp. 223–233). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85792-5.00020-4

Uddin, M. M., & Wright, M. M. (2023a). Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances. Physical Sciences Reviews, 8(9), 2819–2837. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0068

Uddin, M. M., & Wright, M. M. (2023b). Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances. Physical Sciences Reviews, 8(9), 2819–2837. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0068

Zhao, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Hydraulic retention time and pressure affect anaerobic digestion process treating synthetic glucose wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 370, 128531. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2022.128531

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Mohamed, N. N., Rozidi, F. N., Siregar, Y., Riawan, D. C., & Yuhendri, M. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION TOOL FOR ASSESSING BIOGAS POTENTIAL OF ORGANIC WASTE MIXTURES. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 13(2), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v13i2.9851