Optimising Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Review of the Conventional and Surgery-First Approaches

Authors

  • HuiMin Tian Centre of Studies for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , MARA University of Technology image/svg+xml
  • Azmeel Mazlee Anuar Centre of Studies for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , MARA University of Technology image/svg+xml
  • Mike Yiu Yan Leung Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , University of Hong Kong image/svg+xml
  • Su Keng Tan Centre of Studies for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , MARA University of Technology image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/cos.v13i1.6211

Keywords:

orthognathic surgery, surgery-first approach, conventional orthognathic approach, facial asymmetry, postoperative stability

Abstract

Objectives: This review explores and compares the Conventional Orthognathic Approach and the Surgery-First Approach in orthognathic surgery.

Materials and Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted by systematically examining peer-reviewed literature, including clinical trials, retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using relevant keywords including “Conventional Orthognathic Approach,” “Surgery-First Approach,” and “Orthognathic Surgery.” Studies were selected based on their relevance to the comparative evaluation of COA and SFA in terms of treatment duration, surgical planning complexity, postoperative stability, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: The SFA demonstrated several advantages, including earlier facial improvement, reduced total treatment time, and improved patient cooperation. Patients treated with SFA often reported enhanced psychological well-being due to the early correction of facial aesthetics. On the other hand, COA remains widely used due to its predictable occlusal outcomes and suitability for a broader patient population. Both approaches showed similar long-term skeletal and dental stability in many studies. In terms of complications, both approaches had comparable safety profiles, though SFA demands greater surgical precision. Notably, SFA also showed promising results in selected cases of facial asymmetry and did not appear to increase the risk of temporomandibular joint dysfunction when carefully managed.

Conclusions: Both COA and SFA are effective and safe strategies in orthognathic surgery. The choice should be guided by patient-specific needs and clinical judgment. SFA may be preferred when quicker aesthetic results and shorter treatment duration are priorities, assuming careful planning and appropriate case selection.

 

 

References

Ahmadvand, A., Alavi, S., & Mehraban, S. H. (2021). An overview of surgery-first orthognathic approach: History, indications and limitations, protocols, and dentoskeletal stability. Dental Research Journal, 18(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.318942

Bacos, J., Turin, S. Y., Vaca, E. E., & Gosain, A. K. (2019). Major complications and 30-day morbidity for single jaw versus bimaxillary orthognathic surgery as reported by NSQIP. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal: Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 56(6), 705–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618814402

Baek, S.-H., Ahn, H.-W., Kwon, Y.-H., & Choi, J.-Y. (2010). Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 21(2), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4

Baek, S.-H., Kim, T.-K., & Kim, M.-J. (2006). Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 101(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.007

Baherimoghaddam, T., Oshagh, M., Naseri, N., Nasrbadi, N. I., & Torkan, S. (2014). Changes in cephalometric variables after orthognathic surgery and their relationship to patients’ quality of life and satisfaction. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research, 5(4), e6. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5406

Bailey, L. J., Duong, H. L., & Proffit, W. R. (1998). Surgical Class III treatment: long-term stability and patient perceptions of treatment outcome. The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, 13(1), 35–44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9558534

Barbosa, A. L., Marcantonio, E., Barbosa, C. E., Gabrielli, M. F., & Gabrielli, M. A. (1993). Psychological evaluation of patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery. The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.35.1

Barrer, A. P. (2009). Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques, 4th edition. The Alpha Omegan, 102(1), 39–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aodf.2009.02.022

Beccuti, M. L., Cozzani, M., Antonini, S., Doldo, T., & Raffaini, M. (2022). “surgery first” vs “traditional sequence” surgery: A qualitative study of health experiences in 46 bimaxillary orthognathic patients. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 21(4), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01610-4

Behrman, S. J., & Behrman, D. A. (1988). Oral surgeons’ considerations in surgical orthodontic treatment. Dental Clinics of North America, 32(3), 481–507. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3042475

Bell, W. H., & Creekmore, T. D. (1973). Surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular prognathism. American Journal of Orthodontics, 63(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90351-5

Bertolini, F., Russo, V., & Sansebastiano, G. (2000). Pre- and postsurgical psycho-emotional aspects of the orthognathic surgery patient. The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, 15(1), 16–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11307218

Bock, J. J., Maurer, P., & Fuhrmann, R. A. W. (2007). The importance of temporomandibular function for patient satisfaction following orthognathic surgery. Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie [Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics], 68(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-007-0424-8

Boutault, F., Paoli, J. R., & Gasquet, F. (1994). Are there still indications for Wassmund’s osteotomy? Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique, 39(4), 431–441. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7755324

Brachvogel, P., Berten, J. L., & Hausamen, J. E. (1991). Operation vor kieferorthopädischer Behandlung: ein zeitliches Konzept der kombinierten Therapie skelettaler Dysgnathien. 79, 557–563.

Bryndahl, F., Eriksson, L., Legrell, P. E., & Isberg, A. (2006). Bilateral TMJ disk displacement induces mandibular retrognathia. Journal of Dental Research, 85(12), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501210

Byun, E.-S., Ahn, S.-J., & Kim, T.-W. (2005). Relationship between internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint and dentofacial morphology in women with anterior open bite. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 128(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.028

Chen, Z., Zhong, Y., Li, B., Ma, H., Lei, B., & Yang, B. (2023). Application of surgery-first approach in treating skeletal dentofacial asymmetry with orthognathic surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 34(6), 1817–1821. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009396

Cho, H. J. (2007). Long-term stability of surgical mandibular setback. The Angle Orthodontist, 77(5), 851–856. https://doi.org/10.2319/052306-209.1

Choi, D.-S., Garagiola, U., & Kim, S.-G. (2019). Current status of the surgery-first approach (part I): concepts and orthodontic protocols. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 41(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0194-4

Choi, J. W., & Bradley, J. P. (2017). Surgery First orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment: Questions and answers. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 28(5), 1330–1333. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003733

Choi, J. W., Lee, J. Y., Yang, S. J., & Koh, K. S. (2015). The reliability of a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III dentofacial deformity. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 74(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318295dcce

Choi, J. W., Park, H., Kim B S, I.-H., Kim, N., Kwon, S.-M., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Surgery-first orthognathic approach to correct facial asymmetry: Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 149(3), 496e–499e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008818

Choi, J. W., Park, H., Kwon, S.-M., & Lee, J. Y. (2021). Surgery-first orthognathic approach for the correction of facial asymmetry. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery: Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 49(6), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.04.005

Choi, J.-W., & Lee, J.-Y. (2021). Current concept of the surgery-first orthognathic approach. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 48(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01305

Durham, J., Newton-John, T. R. O., & Zakrzewska, J. M. (2015). Temporomandibular disorders. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 350(mar12 9), h1154. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1154

Epker, B. N., & Bronson, J. (1978). Surgical-prosthetic correction of dentofacial deformities. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 97(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0270

Florentine, C., Kimberly, A., Mehta, S., Kuo, C.-L., Uribe, F., & Lottinger, C. (2022). Comparable skeletal and dental movements achieved using conventional and surgery-first techniques in Class III patients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 80(11), 1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.08.003

Gandedkar, N. H., Chng, C. K., & Tan, W. (2016). Surgery-first orthognathic approach case series: Salient features and guidelines. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 5(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176657

Girard, A., Lopez, C. D., Chen, J., Perrault, D., Desai, N., Bruckman, K. C., Bartlett, S. P., & Yang, R. (2022). Epistaxis after orthognathic surgery: Literature review and three case studies. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 15(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211008086

Grubb, J., & Evans, C. (2007). Orthodontic management of dentofacial skeletal deformities. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 34(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.002

Guo, J., Wang, T., Han, J. J., Jung, S., Kook, M.-S., Park, H.-J., & Oh, H.-K. (2018). Corrective outcome and transverse stability after orthognathic surgery using a surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with and without facial asymmetry. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 126(1), S2212-4403(18)30053-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.01.017

Hernández-Alfaro, F., Guijarro-Martínez, R., Molina-Coral, A., & Badía-Escriche, C. (2011). “Surgery first” in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(6), e201-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.010

Hoang, T.-A., Lee, K. C., & Chuang, S.-K. (2020). The surgery-first approach to orthognathic surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(2), e153–e156. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006942

Holzinger, D., Willinger, K., Millesi, G., Schicho, K., Breuss, E., Wagner, F., & Seemann, R. (2019). Changes of temporomandibular joint position after surgery first orthognathic treatment concept. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 2206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38786-2

Huang, C. S., Hsu, S. S.-P., & Chen, Y.-R. (2014). Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery. Biomedical Journal, 37(4), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.126863

Huang, S., Chen, W., Ni, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2016). The changes of oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction after surgery-first orthognathic approach: a longitudinal prospective study. Head & Face Medicine, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0098-1

Hullihen, S. P. (1849). Case of elongation of the under jaw and distortion of the face and neck, caused by a burn, successfully treated. The American Journal of Dental Science, 9(2), 157–165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30749486

Hunt, O. T., Johnston, C. D., Hepper, P. G., & Burden, D. J. (2001). The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 120(5), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.118402

Jacobs, J. D., & Sinclair, P. M. (1983). Principles of orthodontic mechanics in orthognathic surgery cases. American Journal of Orthodontics, 84(5), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(93)90003-p

Jeon, J.-H. (2017). Timing of orthognathic surgery: paradigm shift by surgery-first approach? Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 43(2), 61–62. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.61

Jeong, W. S., Choi, J. W., Kim, D. Y., Lee, J. Y., & Kwon, S. M. (2017). Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.006

Jeong, W. S., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, J. W. (2017). Large-scale study of long-term anteroposterior stability in a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 28(8), 2016–2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003853

Jeong, W. S., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, J. W. (2018). Large-scale study of long-term vertical skeletal stability in a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment: Part II. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(4), 953–958. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004433

Kim, C.-S., Lee, S.-C., Kyung, H.-M., Park, H.-S., & Kwon, T.-G. (2014). Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 72(4), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033

Kim, H.-M., Baek, S.-H., Kim, T.-Y., & Choi, J.-Y. (2014). Evaluation of three-dimensional position change of the condylar head after orthognathic surgery using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-made condyle positioning jig. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(6), 2002–2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a246f1

Kim, J.-Y., Jung, H.-D., Kim, S. Y., Park, H.-S., & Jung, Y.-S. (2014). Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 52(6), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.03.011

Kim, M., Jha, N., Choi, J.-H., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, U., Cevidanes, L., Choi, J.-Y., & Baek, S.-H. (2022). Three-dimensional changes in the mandibular proximal segment after using a surgery-first approach in patients with Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 33(7), 1956–1961. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008520

Ko, E. W.-C., Hsu, S. S.-P., Hsieh, H.-Y., Wang, Y.-C., Huang, C. S., & Chen, Y. R. (2011). Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(5), 1469–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022

Komori, E., Aigase, K., Sugisaki, M., & Tanabe, H. (1989). Cause of early skeletal relapse after mandibular setback. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 95(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90132-7

Kwon, T.-G., & Han, M. D. (2019). Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 41(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4

Lee, J.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., Yun, P.-Y., Lee, N.-K., Kim, J.-W., & Choi, J.-H. (2014). Evaluation of stability after orthognathic surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation: comparison according to 3 types of fixation. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(3), 911–915. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000609

Leelasinjaroen, P., Godfrey, K., Manosudprasit, M., Wangsrimongkol, T., Surakunprapha, P., & Pisek, P. (2012). Surgery first orthognathic approach for skeletal Class III malocclusion corrections--a literature review. Chotmaihet Thangphaet [Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand], 95 Suppl 11, S172-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961640

Liao, Y.-F., & Lo, S. H. (2018). Surgical occlusion setup in correction of skeletal Class III deformity using surgery-first approach: Guidelines, characteristics and accuracy. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 11673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30124-2

Liao, Y.-F., Atipatyakul, P., Chen, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-A., Yao, C.-F., & Chen, Y.-R. (2022). Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery with surgery-first approach for class III asymmetry is not related to virtual surgical occlusal contact. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(7), 4935–4945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04462-5

Liao, Y.-F., Chen, Y.-F., Yao, C.-F., Chen, Y.-A., & Chen, Y.-R. (2019). Long-term outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity using surgery-first approach. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(4), 1685–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2603-y

Liao, Y.-F., Chiu, Y.-T., Huang, C.-S., Ko, E. W.-C., & Chen, Y.-R. (2010). Presurgical orthodontics versus no presurgical orthodontics: treatment outcome of surgical-orthodontic correction for skeletal class III open bite. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126(6), 2074–2083. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710

Liou, E. J. W., Chen, P.-H., Wang, Y.-C., Yu, C.-C., Huang, C. S., & Chen, Y.-R. (2011). Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(3), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011

Luther, F., Morris, D. O., & Hart, C. (2003). Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery: how long does it take and why? A retrospective study. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 41(6), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00163-3

Mahmood, H. T., Ahmed, M., Fida, M., Kamal, A. T., & Fatima, F. (2018). Concepts, protocol, variations and current trends in surgery first orthognathic approach: a literature review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 23(3), 36.e1-36.e6. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.36.e1-6.onl

Mirhashemi, A. H., Ghadirian, H., & Samimi, S. M. (2022). Surgery-first approach; From claims to evidence: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Dentistry, 19, 23. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i23.10594

Nagasaka, H., Sugawara, J., Kawamura, H., & Nanda, R. (2009). Surgery first skeletal Class III correction using Skeletal Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod, 43(2), 97–105.

Ngan, P. (2012). Contemporary orthodontics, 5th ed. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 142(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.004

Njio, B. J., ter Heege, G. J., & Prahl-Andersen, B. (2008). Quality development in a dental practice environment. A web-based system for measuring patient satisfaction. Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie [Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics], 69(6), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-008-0654-4

O’Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., Appelbe, P., Bearn, D., Caldwell, S., Harrison, J., Hussain, J., Lewis, D., Littlewood, S., Mandall, N., Morris, T., Murray, A., Oskouei, M., Rudge, S., Sandler, J., Thiruvenkatachari, B., Walsh, T., & Turbill, E. (2009). Prospective, multi-center study of the effectiveness of orthodontic/orthognathic surgery care in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 135(6), 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.043

Obwegeser, H. L. (2007). Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: a letter to the next generations of surgeons. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 34(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.014

Pachêco-Pereira, C., Abreu, L. G., Dick, B. D., De Luca Canto, G., Paiva, S. M., & Flores-Mir, C. (2016). Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist, 86(3), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.2319/040615-227.1

Peiró-Guijarro, M. A., Guijarro-Martínez, R., & Hernández-Alfaro, F. (2016). Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 149(4), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.022

Pelo, S., Saponaro, G., Patini, R., Staderini, E., Giordano, A., Gasparini, G., Garagiola, U., Azzuni, C., Cordaro, M., Foresta, E., & Moro, A. (2017). Risks in surgery-first orthognathic approach: complications of segmental osteotomies of the jaws. A systematic review. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 21(1), 4–12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121363

Pelo, Sandro, Saponaro, G., De Angelis, P., Gasparini, G., Garagiola, U., & Moro, A. (2018). Effect of surgery first orthognathic approach on the temporomandibular joint. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(3), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004227

Pithon, M. M., Nascimento, C. C., Barbosa, G. C. G., & Coqueiro, R. da S. (2014). Do dental esthetics have any influence on finding a job? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics: Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 146(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.001

Poulton, D. R., Taylor, R. C., & Ware, W. H. (1963). Cephalometric x-ray evaluation of the vertical osteotomy correction of mandibular prognathism. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology, 16(7), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(63)90319-0

Prakash, O., Verma, S. K., Jha, A. K., Mallick, S., Ekram, S., & Soni, M. (2023). Surgery-first approach for dentofacial deformity: A systematic review. Cureus, 15(2), e35085. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35085

Reddy, N. V. V., & Potturi, A. (2021). Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach. In Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician (pp. 1463–1475). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_67

Sabri, R. (2006). Orthodontic objectives in orthognathic surgery: state of the art today. World Journal of Orthodontics, 7(2), 177–191. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16779977

Seifi, M., Matini, N.-S., Motabar, A.-R., Motabar, M., professor of orthodontics, private practice, Professor, A., & Professor, A. (2018). Dentoskeletal stability in conventional orthognathic surgery, presurgical orthodontic treatment and surgery-first approach in class-III patients. World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 7(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.29252/wjps.7.3.283

Soverina, D., Gasparini, G., Pelo, S., Doneddu, P., Todaro, M., Boniello, R., Azzuni, C., Grippaudo, C., Saponaro, G., D’Amato, G., Garagiola, U., & Moro, A. (2019). Skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery with the surgery first approach: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(7), 930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.002

Treatment open-bite means plastic oblique osteotomy ascending rami mandible. (n.d.).

Wang, Y.-C., Ko, E. W.-C., Huang, C.-S., Chen, Y.-R., & Takano-Yamamoto, T. (2010). Comparison of transverse dimensional changes in surgical skeletal Class III patients with and without presurgical orthodontics. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 68(8), 1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.089

Wei, H., Liu, Z., Zang, J., & Wang, X. (2018). Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 126(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.02.018

Worms, F. W., Isaacson, R. J., & Speidel, T. M. (1976). Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. The Angle Orthodontist, 46(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1976)046%3C0001:SOTPPA%3E2.0.CO;2

Xi, T., de Koning, M., Bergé, S., Hoppenreijs, T., & Maal, T. (2015). The role of mandibular proximal segment rotations on skeletal relapse and condylar remodelling following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery: Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 43(9), 1716–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.022

Yang, I.-H., Moon, B.-S., Lee, S.-P., & Ahn, S.-J. (2012). Skeletal differences in patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement according to sagittal jaw relationship. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 70(5), e349-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.027

Yang, L., Xiao, Y.-D., Liang, Y.-J., Wang, X., Li, J.-Y., & Liao, G.-Q. (2017). Does the surgery-first approach produce better outcomes in orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 75(11), 2422–2429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.002

Yao, K., Zhu, G., Chen, M., Zhang, B., Wu, Y., & Li, P. (2020). Effect of surgery-first orthognathic approach on oral health-related quality of life. The Angle Orthodontist, 90(5), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.2319/112619-749.1

Zhai, Y., Han, J. J., Jung, S., Kook, M.-S., Park, H.-J., & Oh, H.-K. (2020). Changes in the temporomandibular joint clicking and pain disorders after orthognathic surgery: Comparison of orthodontics-first approach and surgery-first approach. PloS One, 15(9), e0238494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238494

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Tian, H., Anuar, A. M., Leung, M. Y. Y., & Tan, S. K. (2026). Optimising Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Review of the Conventional and Surgery-First Approaches. Compendium of Oral Science, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24191/cos.v13i1.6211