Examining Challenges and Strategies in Implementing STEM Education in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Perspectives of Teachers and Students
Keywords:
challenges, secondary schools, STEM education, students’ perception, teachers’ perceptionAbstract
This study examines the obstacles hindering the complete integration of STEM education in secondary schools, considering perspectives from both teachers and students, and proposing effective strategies. Employing a quantitative survey approach, the research involves 30 STEM teachers and 70 secondary school students. Findings demonstrate a consensus among participants, emphasizing issues such as inadequate teaching equipment and facilities as significant barriers to comprehensive STEM implementation. Educators favor technology-integrated teaching methods, while students show enthusiasm for incorporating these tools into their learning. Proposed effective strategies include enhancing internet accessibility and infrastructure. The study underscores the importance of engaging diverse stakeholders—teachers, parents, societal actors, and governmental bodies—to fully understand challenges and promote successful STEM integration in secondary education.
References
Becking, S. K., & Grady, M. (2019). Implications of the digital divide for technology integration in schools: A white paper. Contemporary Issues in Educational Leadership, 1(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32873/unl.dc.ciel.1011.
Black, S. E., Muller, C., Spitz-Oener, A., He, Z., Hung, K., & Warren, J. R. (2021). The importance of STEM: High school knowledge, skills, and occupations in an era of growing inequality. Research Policy, 50(104249), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104249.
Blom, N., & Abrie, A. L. (2021). Students’ perceptions of the nature of technology and its relationship with science following an integrated curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1726–1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1930273.
Chieng, Y. E., & Tan, C. K. (2021). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers’ survey and perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517.
Chuan, Z. L., Yusoff, W. N. S. W., Aminuddin, A. S. A., & Tan, E. H. (2021, July). Identifying factors that affected student enrolment in Additional Mathematics for urban areas of Kuantan district. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1988(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012047.
Ismail, M. H., Salleh, M. F. M., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2019). The issues and challenges in empowering STEM on science teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i13/6869.
Jekri, A., & Han, C. G. K. (2020). The challenges in implementing STEM teaching and learning in secondary schools. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5(34), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.534006.
Karuppannan, G., Balasubramaniam, B., & Sultan, F. M. M. (2021). Challenges faced by Malaysian government schoolteachers to conduct online lessons for the secondary school students during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(8), 1996–2001. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i8-05.
Kervinen, A., Roth, W. M., Juuti, K., & Uitto, A. (2020). The resurgence of everyday experiences in school science learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(4), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09968-1.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lertcharoenrit, T. (2020). Enhancing Collaborative Problem-Solving Competencies by Using STEM-Based Learning through the Dietary Plan Lessons. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n4p102.
Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention to use E-learning in teaching of mathematics: An extended TAM model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9709.
Marco-Bujosa, L. (2021). Prospective Secondary Math Teachers Encountering STEM in a Methods Course: When Math Is More than Just Math. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.41.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.41.
Mishra, P. J. (2022). A gateway of sustainable development: NEP 2020. Advances in Social Science and Culture, 4(4), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.22158/assc.v4n4p63.
Nawawi, N. M., Sout, N. M., Hassan, K. B., Samah, N. N. A., Kamaruddin, H. H., Khalid, R. M., & Azman, H. H. (2021, May). The perception of pre-university students on STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012155.
Othman, Z. S., Ismail, N., Khalid, A. K., & Tukiman, N. (2020). Module Development for STEM Education Achievement: A Case Study at the Secondary School Level. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(2-3), 1085–1089. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.8771.
Othman, Z. S., Tukiman, N., Khalid, A. K., & Ahmad, N. I. S. (2021). Practicing BizMath challenge modul for primary schools based on the STREAM Curriculum. ESTEEM Academic Journal, 17, 67–76. https://uppp.uitm.edu.my.
Pearson, J., Giacumo, L. A., Farid, A., & Sadegh, M. (2022). A systematic multiple studies review of low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented, STEM-degree support programs: Emerging evidence-based models and recommendations. Education Sciences, 12(5), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050333.
Rahim, S. P. A., Nordin, N., & Samsudin, M. A. (2022). Integrated STEM problem-based learning approach: A study on Malaysian undergraduates’ achievement in learning genetics concepts. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 7(48), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.748003.
Ramli, N., & Awang, M. (2020). Critical factors that contribute to the implementation of the STEM education policy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i1/6811.
Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9.
Shah, S. S. (2022). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v2i2.43554.
Stohlmann, M. (2021). Integrated STEM education through game-based learning, Technology, 2238–2242. https://doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020-381.
Tan, B. S., & Wong, S. L. (2020). Learning principles of accounting in ICT-supported learning environments of Malaysian secondary schools: future-oriented approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00128-6.
Vien, M. V., Ai, J. T. T., & Sung, C. K. (2019). The Challenges of Implementing Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Based Online Learning in Chinese Independent High Schools (CIHS) in Malaysia. Research in World Economy, 10(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v10n2p117.
Xu, X., Wang, J., Peng, H., & Wu, R. (2019). Prediction of academic performance associated with internet usage behaviors using machine learning algorithms. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.015.
Yean, T. F., & Chin, T. L. (2019). Parental Influence and Undergraduates’ Career Choice Intentions. Sains Humanika, 11(2-2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v11n2-2.1661.
Zainal, N. F. A., Din, R., Abd Majid, N. A., Nasrudin, M. F., & Abd Rahman, A. H. (2018). Primary and secondary school students’ perspective on Kolb-based STEM module and robotic prototype. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4-2), 1394–1401. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6794.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Azli Riduan, Zarith Sofiah Othman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
