Effective Communication and Group Cohesiveness in the Outdoor Recreation Program Curriculum
Keywords:
curriculum development, effective communication, group cohesiveness, outdoor recreation program.Abstract
This research endeavor seeks to explore the correlation between effective communication and group cohesiveness within the framework of outdoor recreational programs' curriculum. The study delves into the two fundamental components of effective communication: external perception encompassing clarity and information dissemination, and internal dissemination focusing on conflict resolution. In addition, the analysis of group cohesiveness entails an examination of four dimensions: individual attractions towards the group in social contexts (ATG-S), individual attractions towards the group in task-oriented settings (ATG-T), group integration-social (GI-S) and group integration-task (GI-T). A set of questionnaires based on Interpersonal Communication Skills (ICS) and Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) was completed by 100 students who took an outdoor recreation program. The respondent in this study consists of male (n=58) and female (n=42) respondents. The result revealed that external perception is positively associated with group integration social (GI-S) but negatively associated with individual attraction to the group task (ATG-T). Internal disseverance is not associated with individual attraction to the group social (ATG-S) and group integration task (GI-T). Conversely, negatively associated with group integration social (GI-S) and individual attraction to the group task (ATG-T). The findings underscore the complex interplay between external factors (such as perception) and internal group dynamics (such as conflict management) in shaping overall group cohesiveness and member engagement. These findings could help students and academicians understand the elements of group cohesiveness which can lead to more effective group work and improved learning experience for better educational achievement.
References
Bergart, A. M., & Clements, J. A. (2015). Going to Camp Together: Lighting the Group Work Fire in a New Generation. Social Work with Groups, 38(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2014.931667
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1988). Group Cohesion and Individual Adherence to Physical Activity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.10.2.127
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
Durant, A., & Shepherd, I. (2009). ‘Culture’ and ‘Communication’ in Intercultural Communication. European Journal of English Studies, 13(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570902907185
Fang, W., Hassan, A., & LePage, B. A. (2022). Outdoor education. In Sustainable development goals series (pp. 229–260). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1_8
Hodge, B. (2014). Training programs that facilitate lasting change in student academic behaviour. International Journal of Training Research, 12(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2014.11082042
Hulin, C., Netemeyer, R., & Cudeck, R. (2001). Can a reliability coefficient be too high. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1), 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1001&2_05
Kelly, S. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (pp. 307–326). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247.n17
McGraw, P. (1992). Transfer Problems in Outdoor Management Development Programs and How to Overcome Them. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED353118.pdf
Nibler, R., & Harris, K. L. (2003). The Effects of Culture and Cohesiveness on Intragroup Conflict and Effectiveness. (“Culture and Interpersonal Violence Research: Paradigm Shift to Create a ...”) The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(5), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598467
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2007). Learning in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel approach to study the influence of student, group, and task characteristics. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(1), 55-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290600811578
Scollo, M., & Carbaugh, D. (2013). Interpersonal communication: qualities and culture. Russian Journal of Communication, 5(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2013.805664
Shivers-Blackwell, S. L. (2004). Using Role Theory to Examine Determinants of Transformational and Transactional Leader Behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(3), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190401000304
Theobald, E. J., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter. PLoS ONE, 12(7), e0181336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181336
Williams, S. D., Graham, T. S., & Baker, B. (2003). Evaluating outdoor experiential training for leadership and team building. Journal of Management Development, 22(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710310454851
Worley, J. T., Harenberg, S., & Vosloo, J. (2020). The relationship between peer servant leadership, social identity, and team cohesion in intercollegiate athletics. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 49, 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101712
Zink, R., & Boyes, M. (2006). The nature and scope of outdoor education in New Zealand schools. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 10(1), 11-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03400826
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syaza Nur Nadirah Afzainizam, Ellail Ain Mohd Aznan, Ahmad Fikri Mohd Kassim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
