An empirical study on the relationship between generative artificial intelligence and analytical skill development: The mediating role of knowledge sharing

Authors

  • Gang Liu Business School, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Sheng Shu School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China
  • Yi Chen Business School, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Zixiao Zhuang Middlebury Institute of International Studies, Monterey, US

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/rn8zyc21

Keywords:

Generative artificial intelligence, Knowledge sharing, Critical thinking, Analytical skill

Abstract

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in teaching and learning is a popular research topic in education, sparking a great deal of controversy. This study explores the effect of the application of GenAI and knowledge sharing on the analytical skills of university students. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyse data from 295 Chinese university students who are studying hospitality, tourism and sports-related programmes. Results suggest that students are highly receptive to using GenAI in their learning, and leveraging GenAI can positively affect students’ analytical skills through knowledge sharing. This study provides empirically grounded evidence elucidating the role of GenAI in enhancing students' analytical capabilities, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of this emerging technology's implications in knowledge management, which offers critical insights into the previously underexplored impact of GenAI application on knowledge sharing behaviors within learning environments.

References

Abdul Rahman, N. Z., Ahmad, N., Abd Rashid, N. H., Abdul Hakim, N., K N Vaiappuri, S., & Abdul Raof, W. N. A. (2025). Perceptions and Usage of AI-Based Applications among Plantation Students in Malaysian Higher Education. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 15(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v15i2.7421

Akrofi, G. Y. K. (2023). Tacit knowledge sharing: Review of literature and integrative framework. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 14(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2023.133842

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Andrae, S. (2025). Critical Thinking and GenAI: A Guide to Action. In M. W. Kessinger, G. S. Nelson, L. Lennex, & K. F. Nettleton (Eds.), Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics (pp. 377–412). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4576-5.ch011

Baharuddin, M. F., Zaki, N. D. A., Yusuff, K. N. M., & Anuar, M. A. W. (2024). Assessing the Acceptance and Behavioral Intentions Towards ChatGPT among Undergraduate Students. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 14(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v14i2.3668

Chang, H., Liu, B., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., & He, F. (2025). Research on the acceptance of ChatGPT among different college student groups based on latent class analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2331646

Chang, W.-L., & Yeh, Y. (2021). A blended design of game-based learning for motivation, knowledge sharing and critical thinking enhancement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1885482

Chhim, P. P., Somers, T. M., & Chinnam, R. B. (2017). Knowledge reuse through electronic knowledge repositories: A multi theoretical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0126

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

Chon, K. K. S., & Hao, F. (2025). Technological evolution in tourism: A Horizon 2050 perspective. Tourism Review, 80(1), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2023-0753

Dalgıç, A., Yaşar, E., & Demir, M. (2024). ChatGPT and learning outcomes in tourism education: The role of digital literacy and individualized learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 34, 100481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100481

Darban, M. (2025). The future of virtual team learning: Navigating the intersection of AI and education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(3), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2288912

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883

Edwards, F. (2011). Teaching and learning together: Making space for curriculum negotiation in higher education. Waikato Journal of Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v16i3.41

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198

Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2025). The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008

Huang, L., Fan, A. P.-C., Su, N., Thai, J., Kosik, R. O., & Zhao, X. (2021). Chinese medical students’ disposition for critical thinking: A mixed methods exploration. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02801-w

Jia, W., Pan, L., & Neary, S. (2025). Effect of GenAI Dependency on University Students’ Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Perceived Teacher Caring. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101348

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Lang, Q., Wang, M., Yin, M., Liang, S., & Song, W. (2025). Transforming Education With Generative AI (GAI): Key Insights and Future Prospects. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2025.3537618

Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174

Liu, G., Kianto, A., & Tsui, E. (2023). Knowledge management technologies and organizational performance: A meta-analytic study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(2), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2022-0121

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100

Melisa, R., Ashadi, A., Triastuti, A., Hidayati, S., Salido, A., Ero, P. E. L., Marlini, C., Zefrin, Z., & Al Fuad, Z. (2025). Critical Thinking in the Age of AI: A Systematic Review of AI’s Effects on Higher Education. Educational Process International Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.31

Menssen, S. (1993). Critical Thinking and the Construction of Knowledge. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293037001009

Nazeer, S., Sumbal, M. S., Liu, G., Munir, H., & Tsui, E. (2025). The next big thing: Role of ChatGPT in personal knowledge management challenges and opportunities for knowledge workers across diverse disciplines. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(7–8), 2255–2269. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2023-0246

Nazeer, S., Sumbal, M. S., Yasin, N., Abbas, J., Papa, A, & Liu, G. (2026) ChatGPT in Higher Education and Sustainable Development Goals: A Comparative Study of Institutional Perspectives from Developing and Developed Economies. Sustainable Development (Forthcoming)

Ngo, T. T. A., Tran, T. T., An, G. K., & Nguyen, P. T. (2024). ChatGPT for Educational Purposes: Investigating the Impact of Knowledge Management Factors on Student Satisfaction and Continuous Usage. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3383773

Olan, F., Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun, E., Suklan, J., Nakpodia, F., Damij, N., & Jayawickrama, U. (2022). Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 145, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.008

Peng, M., Wang, G., & Chen, J. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 39(9), 644-647.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Ray, P. P. (2024). A deep introspection into the role of ChatGPT for transforming hospitality, leisure, sport, and tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 35, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100504

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x

Sumbal, M. S., Amber, Q., Tariq, A., Raziq, M. M., & Tsui, E. (2024). Wind of change: How ChatGPT and big data can reshape the knowledge management paradigm? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(9), 2736–2757. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2023-0360

Sungur Gül, K., & Ateş, H. (2023). An examination of the effect of technology-based STEM education training in the framework of technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8761–8787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11539-x

Tang, J., Liu, G., Bai, J., & Jiang, J. (2024). The impacts of peer assessment on critical thinking competence: An epistemic network analysis. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 35, 100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100515

Tuo, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, J., & Si, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in tourism: Insights and future research agenda. Tourism Review, 80(4), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2024-0180

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 41(6), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press

Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Zhao, J. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320

Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237

Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing self‐regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1842–1863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599

Yeh, Y. (2012). A co-creation blended KM model for cultivating critical-thinking skills. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.017

Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Lytras, M., Ordonez De Pablos, P., & He, W. (2018). Exploring the effect of transformational leadership on individual creativity in e-learning: A perspective of social exchange theory. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1964–1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1296824

Zia, U., Zhang, J., Xiaoyun, D., & Jinyan, L. (2024). Significance of knowledge management process and customer relationship management for stimulating innovation capability: Empirical analysis, PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 15(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2024.138069

Downloads

Published

10-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, G., Shu, S., Chen, Y., & Zhuang, Z. (2026). An empirical study on the relationship between generative artificial intelligence and analytical skill development: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 16(1), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.24191/rn8zyc21

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.