Declarable Integration of NIST AI Risk Management into AI-driven ISMS through Policy-as-Code

Authors

  • Dmitri Kharchevnikov Great Falls College Montana State University
  • Steven Robinett Great Falls College Montana State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/1pd5sq41

Keywords:

AI Risk Management, Declarable Security, Policy-as-Code, Cybersecurity

Abstract

This study proposes a unified framework for declarable cybersecurity risk assessment in AI-driven Information Security Management Systems to enhance trust and assurance through systematic mapping of NIST AI Risk Management Framework actions for automated enforcement within ISO/IEC 27001:2022-compliant environments. A key contribution is a reproducible methodology for transforming NIST AI 600-1 provisions into Policy-as-Code action statements, explicitly aligning them with the CIA triad and the four NIST AI RMF functions of Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. Using a novel declarability schema, the study validates that 84.9% of AI governance actions can be automated, with Measure being the most declarable function and Detective controls dominating, primarily targeting AI's Model and Output layers. While Integrity is highly emphasized across AI RMF functions, especially Map at 21.7%, Confidentiality and Availability are less represented. The crosswalk from NIST AI RMF to ISO/IEC 27002:2022 reveals strong alignment in Governance, Threat and Vulnerability Management, and Information Security Event Management, but highlights critical gaps in System and Network Security, Identity and Access Management, and Asset Management. This research provides a foundational framework for integrating AI governance into ISMS via Policy-as-Code, enabling traceable, auditable, and standards-aligned security policies for AI systems.

References

Akhtar, Z. B., & Rawol, A. T. (2024). Enhancing cybersecurity through artificial intelligence (AI)-powered security mechanisms. IT Journal Research and Development (ITJRD), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2022.16852

Al-Dhahri, S., Al-Sarti, M., & Abdul, A. (2017). Information security management system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 158(7), 29-33.

Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023). Explainable artificialiIntelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Information Fusion, 99, 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805

Badman, A. (2024). What is AI risk management? IBM. Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-risk-management

Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025). AI governance: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5(3), 3265–3279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w

CSA (2025). AI Controls Matrix. Cloud Security Alliance. https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/artifacts/ai-controls-matrix

Flehmig, N., Lundteigen, M. A., & Yin, S. (2024). Implementing artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems during operation: Challenges and extended framework for a quality assurance process. IECON 2024 - 50th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON55916.2024.10906021

Fok, R., & Weld, D. S. (2024). In search of verifiability: Explanations rarely enable complementary performance in AI-advised decision making. AI Magazine, 45(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12182

Habbal, A., Ali, M. K., & Abuzaraida, M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence trust, risk and security management (AI TRiSM): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 240, 122442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122442

Hale, M. L., & Gamble, R. F. (2019). Semantic hierarchies for extracting, modeling, and connecting compliance requirements in information security control standards. Requirements Engineering, 24, 365–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0287-5

Hind, M. (2020). IBM FactSheets Further Advances Trust in AI. IBM. Retrieved July 9, 2025, from https://research.ibm.com/blog/aifactsheets

ISO (2018). ISO/IEC 27000:2018. Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Overview and vocabulary (5th ed.). International Organization for Standardization. International Electrotechnical Commission.

ISO (2022-a). ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements (3rd ed.). International Organization for Standardization. International Electrotechnical Commission.

ISO (2022-b). ISO/IEC 27002:2022. Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security controls (3rd ed.). International Organization for Standardization. International Electrotechnical Commission.

ISO (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization. International Electrotechnical Commission.

Jada, I., & Mayayise, T. O. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on organizational cyber security: An outcome of a systematic literature review. Data and Information Management, 8(2), 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2023.100063

Jeffy, M., & Bello, S. (2025). AI governance in RPA: Ensuring compliance and transparency in automated decisions. ResearchGate. Retrieved July 4, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391633567_AI_Governance_in_RPA_Ensuring_Compliance_and_Transparency_in_Automated_Decisions

Jothimani, A. P. (2022). Enabling secure cloud governance using policy as code [Master's thesis, Chalmers University of Technology. University of Gothenburg].

Kaur, R., Gabrijelčič, D., & Klobučar, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence for cybersecurity: Literature review and future research directions. Information Fusion, 97, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101804

Kordjamshidi, P., Roth, D., & Kersting, K. (2022). Declarative learning-based programming as an interface to AI systems. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 5, 755361. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.755361

Korrapati, R. (2024). Automating compliance in CI/CD pipelines: A modern software development framework. Available at SSRN 5139607. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5139607

Kreutz, H., & Jahankhani, H. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on enterprise information security management in the context of ISO 27001 and 27002: A tertiary systematic review and comparative analysis. In H. Jahankhani, G. Bowen, M. S. Sharif, & O. Hussien (Eds.), Cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (pp. 1–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52272-7_1

Kunle-Lawanson, O. (2022). The role of Al in information security risk management. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 7(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaots.2022.7.2.0128

Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023). Trustworthy AI: From principles to practices. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803

Malik, A., Arshid, K., Noonari, N., & Munir, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity framework using machine learning for advanced threat detection and prevention. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2025.v13i06.005

Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. FAT* ’19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, January 29–31, 2019, Atlanta, GA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596

Mohamed, N. (2023). Current trends in AI and ML for cybersecurity: A state-of-the-art survey. Cogent Engineering, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2272358

NIST (2021). NIST AI 800-204B. Attribute-based access control for microservices-based applications using a service Mesh U.S. Department of Commerce. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-204B

NIST (2023). NIST AI 100-1. Artificial intelligence risk management framework: U.S. Department of Commerce. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

NIST (2024). NIST AI 600-1. Artificial intelligence risk management framework: Generative artificial intelligence profile. U.S. Department of Commerce. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1

Obisesan, S. M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and cybersecurity frameworks: Challenges and opportunities in e-commerce cybersecurity management. Available at SSRN 5070108. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5070108

Pigola, A., & De Souza Mierelles, F. (2024). Unraveling trust management in cybersecurity: Insights from a systematic literature review. Information Technology and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-024-00438-x

Polemi, N., Praça, I., Kioskli, K., & Bécue, A. (2024). Challenges and efforts in managing AI trustworthiness risks: a state of knowledge. Frontiers in Big Data, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1381163

Polito, C., & Pupillo, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. Intereconomics, 59(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2024-0004

Raja, A. K., & Zhou, J. (2023). AI accountability: approaches, affecting factors, and challenges. Computer, 56(4), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3238390

Salako, A. O., Fabuyi, J. A., Aideyan, N. T., Selesi-Aina, O., Dapo-Oyewole, D. L., & Olaniyi, O. O. (2024). Advancing information governance in AI-driven cloud ecosystem: Strategies for enhancing data security and meeting regulatory compliance. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 17(12), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i12530

Vakhula, O., Kurii, Y., Opirskyy, I., & Susukailo, V. (2024). Security-as-code concept for fulfilling ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. Proceedings of the Workshop Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems (CPITS 2024), 3654. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3654/paper6.pdf

Webster, N., Burton, A., Hawkins E., Pum, M., & Watson, J. (2023). automated compliance checks with open policy agent (OPA) in multi-cloud. ResreachGate. Retrieved July 9, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392163378_Automated_Compliance_Checks_with_Open_Policy_Agent_OPA_in_Multi-Cloud

Downloads

Published

10-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kharchevnikov, D., & Robinett, S. (2026). Declarable Integration of NIST AI Risk Management into AI-driven ISMS through Policy-as-Code. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 16(1), 105-133. https://doi.org/10.24191/1pd5sq41

Similar Articles

1-10 of 125

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.