FACTORS INFLUENCING RESIDENTS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED HOUSEHOLD SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Nor Eeda Haji Ali Department of Built Environment Studies and Technologies, 4Faculty of Built Environment,Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak MALAYSIA
  • Nurain Mohd Talmizi Department of Built Environment Studies and Technologies, 4Faculty of Built Environment,Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak MALAYSIA
  • Syazwani Ahmad Department of Built Environment Studies and Technologies, 4Faculty of Built Environment,Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak MALAYSIA
  • Siti Kartina Juhari Faculty of Built Environment,Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak MALAYSIA
  • Stephen Enyinnaya Eluwa Bodley Company Limited (Environmental & Engineering Services), Ibadan, Oyo State, NIGERIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/bqqn4116

Keywords:

Willingness to pay, Shah Alam city, Contingent valuation method, Solid waste management, Ibadan city

Abstract

Solid waste management is a major environmental challenge facing most developing countries. The goal of this study is to identify the factors that influence residents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for improved solid waste management in Shah Alam city, Malaysia and Ibadan city, Nigeria. A total of 440 residents were randomly selected across residential neigbourhoods in the two cities. The contingent valuation method (CVM) involving two hypothetical improved service scenarios in waste management were used to estimate WTP. Binary logit regression analysis technique was employed to determine factors that influence residents’ WTP. Findings from the study revealed that on average, residents from Shah Alam city are willing to pay RM58.47 (USD$12.2) for the proposed service improvement in waste management, while Ibadan city residents are willing to pay ₦4,796 (USD$ 3.4). In terms of factors that influence WTP for improved SWM, results showed that income, household size, and educational qualifications have significant influence on WTP for improved SWM in both cities.

References

Abila, B., & Kantola, J. (2013). Municipal solid waste management problems in Nigeria: Evolving knowledge management solutions. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 7(6), 303–308.

Afroz, R., Masud, M.M., (2011). Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Waste Manag. 31, 800–808.

Agamuthu, P., & Fauziah, S. H. (2011). Challenges and issues in moving towards sustainable landfilling in a transitory country: Malaysia. Waste Management & Research, 29, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10383080.

Agbo, M. (2023). The problem with solid waste management in Nigeria’s low-income neighbourhoods. Earth.Org. https://earth.org/theproblem-with-solid-waste-management-in-nigerias-low-incomeneighbourhoods/

Aggrey, N., & Douglason, O. G. (2010). Determinants of willingness to pay for solid waste management in Kampala City. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 119–122.

Akhtar, S., Ahmad, A., Qureshi, M., Shahraz, S. (2017). Households willingness to pay for improved solid waste management. Global J.Environ. Sci. Manag. 3, 143–152.

Alberini, A., & Cooper, J. (2000). Applications of the contingent valuation method in developing countries: A survey. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Awunyo-Vitor, D., Shaibu, I., & Jasaw, G. S. (2013). Urban households’ willingness to pay for improved solid waste disposal services in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Urban Studies Research, 2013, Article 659425. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/659425.

Bahauddin, K. M., & Uddin, M. H. (2012). Prospect of solid waste situation and an approach of environmental management measure (EMM) model for sustainable solid waste management: Case study of Dhaka City. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, 5(1), 99–111.

Banga, M., Razack, B. L., & Adolf, F. M. (2011). Households’ willingness to pay for improved solid waste collection services in Kampala City, Uganda. Environment and Development, 20(4), 53–62.

Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E., Martin, K.M., Wright, J.L. (1996). Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics. 72, 80–99.

Chakrabarti, S., Sarkhel, P. (2003). Economics of solid waste management: a survey of existing literature. Economic Res. Unit Indian Stat. Institute. 30, 1–9.

Che Pak, N.A.H, Ismail, S., Mohd Alwi, N. (2023). Translation of the management control system in a privatized solid waste management network. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 1832-5912 DOI 10.1108/JAOC-08-2021-0100.

Chinh, P.C., Hung, N.T.Q., Minh Ky, N., Thi Le Ai, N., Tam, N.Y. (2021). Willingness to Pay for Improving Household Solid Waste Management in Vietnam. App. Envi. Res. 43(2): 1-14 Chung, W. & Yeung, I.M.H. (2019). Analysis of residents’ choice of waste charge methods and willingness to pay amount for solid waste management in Hong Kong. Waste Management. 96, 136–148.

Ebekozien, A., Samsurijan, M. S., Aigbavboa, C., & Malek, N. M. (2023). Malaysia’s low-cost housing solid waste management in the era of COVID-19: The role of fourth industrial revolution technologies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2022-0017

Fadhullah, W., Imran, N. I. N., Ismail, S. N. S., Jaafar, H. M., & Abdullah,H. (2022). Household solid waste management practices and perceptions among residents in the East Coast of Malaysia. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12274-7

Guerrero, L.A., Maas, G. & Hogland, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag. 33,220–232.

Hanemann, M.W., (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? American Economic Review, 81, 635–647.

Haron, N. F., Kamaludin, M., Mahmood, S., & Amirah, N. A. (2023). Analysis of households’ willingness to pay for solid waste management services in Kuala Nerus, Terengganu. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(10), 35–48.

Hilburn, A. M. (2015). Participatory risk mapping of garbage-related issues in a rural Mexican municipality. Geographical Review, 105(1), 41–60.

Honu, B. (2007). Contingent Valuation Method for General Practitioners: a Cookbook Approach.

Ike, C. C., Ezeibe, C. C., Anijiofor, S. C., & Nik Daud, N. N. (2018). Solid waste management in Nigeria: Problems, prospects, and policies. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 44(2).

Kayamo S.E. (2022). Willingness to pay for solid waste management improvement in Hawassa city, Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 113973.

Lim, R. (2018). Green Ways to Manage Waste, The Star, 9 September, available at: https://www.thestar. com.my/news/nation/2018/09/09/green-ways-to-manage-waste-swcorp-goes-for-greentechnology- andeducating-the-young (accessed 17 feb 2024).

Manuel, S.C., Juan, C.R.R., Alberto, L.T., Rafael, A.J. (2017). Stakeholder analysis of municipal solid waste companies - A first step towards successful corporate social responsibility. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 20(2), 40–53.MIDA. (2022). Waste to Energy for A Sustainable Future. available at:www.mida.gov.my/waste-toenergy- for-a-sustainable-future (accessed 24 February 2024).

Abu Eusuf, M. et. al. (2011). Solid Waste Generation Characteristics: The Malaysian Local Authorities’s Outlook. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners. IX, 51-76.

Mulat, S., Worku, W., Minyihun, A. (2019). Willingness to pay for improved solid waste management and associated factors among households in Injibara town, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes 12, 1–6.

Ndau, H. & Tilley, E. (2023). Willingness to Pay for Improved Household Solid Waste Collection in Blantyre, Malawi. Economies, 6, 54;doi:10.3390/economies6040054.

Onukogu, H.F. (2018). Willingness To Pay for Improved Solid Waste Collection Services In A Commercial Centre in Sango, Nigeria. Thesis Submitted to Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).

Othman, J. (2007). Economic Valuation of Household Preference for Solid Waste Management in Malaysia: A Choice Modeling Approach, IJMS 14 (1), 189-212.

Patrick, I.M.V., Okon, U.E., Solomon, U.U. (2017). Households’ willingness to pay for improved solid waste management in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa ibom state, Nigeria. Am. J. Environ. Protect. 5, 68–72.

Saadatian, O., Haw, L. C., Mat, S. B., & Sopian, K. (2012). Perspective of sustainable development in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 2(6), 260–267.

Samah, M.A.A., Manaf, L.A., Ahsan, A., Sulaiman, W.N.A., P. Agamuthu, D’Silva, J.L. (2013). Household Solid Waste Composition in Balakong City, Malaysia: Trend and Management. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22 (6), 1807–1816.

Sarpong, S., & Alarussi, A. S. (2022). Waste to wealth: Enhancing circularities in the Malaysian economy. Technological Sustainability, 1(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-01-2022-0001.

Sarpong, S. (2020). Counting the cost: Malaysia’s push-back begins over overseas waste dumping. Society, 57, 77–84.

Boateng, S., Amoako, P., Appiah, A. F., Garsonu, E. K., & Poku, P. (2016). Household willingness to pay for solid waste disposal services in urban Ghana: The Kumasi Metropolis situation. Ghana Journal of Geography, 8(2), 1–17.

Song, Q., Wang, Z., & Li, J. (2016). Residents’ attitudes and willingness to pay for solid waste management in Macau. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 31, 635–643.

Subhan, M., Abdul Ghani, A. B., & Raihan Joarder, M. H. (2014). Urban community willingness to pay for improved solid waste management in Malaysian municipality: A choice modelling approach. Asian Social Science, 10(18).

Uwadiegwu, B. & Chukwu, K. (2013). Strategies For Effective Urban Solid Waste Management in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 9(8), 296-308.

Wafaurahman Wafa, et. al. (2023), Urban Development and Waste Management Planning in Kabu New City, Afghanistan: A Case Study. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners. 21 (5). 96-109.

Wiedinmyer, C., Yokelson, R. J., & Gullett, B. K. (2014). Global emissions of trace gases, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants from open burning of domestic waste. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(16), 9525–9530. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502250z

World Bank. (2018). A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/30317

World Bank. (2022). Solid Waste Management. available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/ urbandevelopment/brief/solid-wastemanagement (accessed 7 February 2024).

Yusop, Y. M., & Othman, N. (2019). Linking Malaysia’s solid waste management policy instruments with household recycling behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 474–488.

Zhu, D., Asnani, P.U., Zurbr€ugg, C., Anapolsky, S. & Mani, S. (2008), Improving Municipal Solid Waste Management in India: A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Haji Ali, N. E., Mohd Talmizi, N., Ahmad, S., Juhari, S. K., & Eluwa, S. E. (2026). FACTORS INFLUENCING RESIDENTS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED HOUSEHOLD SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 13(1), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.24191/bqqn4116