Navigating Boundaries: Uncovering Constraints in Focus Group Discussion Within the Context of Security Issue

Authors

  • Bibianah Thomas Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sabah Branch, 88997 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Afida Arapa Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sabah Branch, 88997 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Jennifah Nordin Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sabah Branch, 88997 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Ibianaflorinciliana Niane Anthony Aning Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sabah Branch, 88997 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Saiful Zizi Jalil Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan (FSSK), Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v22i1.6540

Keywords:

focus group discussion, FGD, qualitative, methodology, challenges, security

Abstract

Focus group discussion (FGD) is a crucial data collection strategy in qualitative research design. Using FGDs enables researchers to gather in-depth information from a large number of participants efficiently in terms of cost and effort. The advantage of FDGs is that they allow the collection of diverse perspectives from multiple participants simultaneously in a single location. However, despite their benefits, FDGs―like other research methods―have certain limitations that must be identified to implement appropriate mitigation measures. This paper aims to explore these limitations of FGDs. The researchers employed observation techniques during a series of FGDs in Sabah to examine security issues in the region. The study investigated the challenges experienced by both researchers and participants throughout the process. The findings reveal various constraints that emerged before (networking challenges, inappropriate site selection, last-minute cancellations), during (insufficient information, inadequate moderation skills, device issues, irrelevant information, time constraints, social desirability, groupthink, personality dynamics), and after (analytical constraints) the FGDs were conducted. These insights are expected to benefit future studies, particularly those in which FGDs are being considered as the data collection method.

Downloads

Published

31.03.2025