Chasing the Stars: Balancing Global University Rankings and Public Accountability in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i2.10819Keywords:
University rankings, higher education, New Public Management, public accountabilityAbstract
This study examines the conflict between Malaysia’s ambition to achieve high international university rankings, often seen as "chasing the stars" and the basic duty of public universities to remain accountable to society. Under the influence of market-driven management practices, Malaysian universities increasingly focus on performance metrics, global visibility, and prestige. Using a systematic review of existing literature, this paper examines three interconnected themes: the emergence of world-class universities and global ranking systems, the influence of New Public Management on higher education governance, and the concept of public accountability within universities. Together, these perspectives provide the theoretical foundation for analysing the tensions and challenges associated with Malaysia's pursuit of world-class university status. The findings show that while local evaluation systems like SETARA and MyRA boost research productivity, their heavy focus on measurable numbers harms teaching quality, social inclusion, and public value. By comparing Malaysia's situation with Singapore’s workforce-focused SkillsFuture initiative, this study suggests reforming Malaysian higher education policies. It recommends shifting from purely numbers-driven targets toward a balanced system that measures public and societal value. Ultimately, the study argues that global recognition should not be the final goal; true university excellence must be judged by an institution's ability to build public trust, support student growth, and contribute meaningfully to national development.
References
Aliran. (2025, July 22). Rescuing Malaysian higher education from neoliberalism. Aliran.
Al-Rubeai, M. (2023). Global university rankings: Prestige, performance, and pitfalls. Higher Education Policy.
Altbach, P. G. (2013). The international imperative in higher education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-338-6
Amado Mateus, M., & Juarez Acosta, F. (2022). Reputation in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 925117. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.925117
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
Besley & A. L. Locke (Eds.), The handbook of the politics of higher education (pp. 123–145). Routledge.
Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(2), 87–100.
Bleiklie, I. (2018). New Public Management or neoliberalism, higher education. In The Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_143-1
Case, W. (2002). Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or less. Routledge.
Common, R. K. (2001). Public management and policy transfer in South East Asia. Ashgate Publishing.
Da Wan, C., Sok, S., Sirat, M., & Un, L. (2018). Governance of higher education in Malaysia and Cambodia: Running on a similar path?. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 7(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2018.7.1.49
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Jie, N. D. (2016). Towards a framework of education policy analysis. THF Literature Review, 1–36.
Kouam, F. A. W. (2024). Interpretivism or constructivism: Navigating research paradigms in social science research. International Journal of Research Publications, 143(1), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001431220246122
Krücken, G. (2021). The downsides of competition in higher education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education, 81(4), 743–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00571-7
Kwek, D., Ho, J., & Wong, H. M. (2023). Singapore's educational reforms toward holistic outcomes: (Un)intended consequences of policy layering. Case Study. Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Brief_Singapores-educational-reforms-toward-holistic-outcomes_FINAL.pd
Lo, W. Y. (2014a). University rankings: Impacts on global higher education. Higher Education, 68(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9719-z
Lo, W. Y. W. (2014b). Think global, think local: The changing landscape of higher education and the role of quality assurance in Singapore. Policy and Society, 33(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.09.002
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2014). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching. AISHE-J, 6(3), 3351–33514.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.
Marginson, S. (2017). Global university rankings: The metrics race. Higher Education, 74(1), 1–16.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2023). Education Statistics Digest 2023: Moulding the future of our nation. https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/about-us/education-statistics-digest-2023.p
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.
Mok, K. H. (2010). When state centralism meets neo-liberalism: Managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia. Higher Education, 60(4), 419–440.
Mok, K. H. (2015). The quest for world-class university status: Globalisation, governance and institutional response in Asia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 185–193.
Naidoo, R. (2018a). The competition fetish in higher education: Shamans, mind snares and consequences. European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118784839
Naidoo, R. (2018b). The legitimization of inequality: Higher education and the new global order. Higher Education, 75(5), 785–802.
OECD. (2025). Fostering excellence in higher education: The role of competition, funding, and governance (No. 2025/11). OECD Publishing.
Rust, V. (2012). New public management and education: A global perspective. European Education, 44(2), 17–31.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank.
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Macmillan.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stillman, R. J. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. St. Martin's Press
UNICEF Malaysia. (2020). Education and inequality in Malaysia. UNICEF Malaysia.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Syaqirin Mohd Seat, Nur Farhah Aliah Mohamad Khairuz, Nurdina Sofea Ahmad Danial, Jeniwaty Mohd Jody
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
