Enhancing quality assurance and accreditation readiness through a digital portfolio in higher education

Authors

  • Norsabrina Sihab Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Adi Izhar Che Ani Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Asmalia Zanal Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i3.11538

Keywords:

Digital portfolio system, Teaching and learning documentation, Quality assurance, Internal audit, Accreditation compliance

Abstract

The digital portfolio system is increasingly adopted in higher education. However, empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness in enhancing usability, ensuring compliance with accreditation standards, improving audit efficiency, and supporting academic documentation management remains limited. To address these gaps, this study evaluates the users’ experience and perception of the system’s usability, accessibility, and effectiveness in facilitating quality documentation, audit readiness, and compliance with accreditation requirements. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving 58 lecturers who participated voluntarily from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, UiTM Cawangan Pulau Pinang. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.873, indicating high reliability, and were complemented by system log analysis to examine usage patterns, update frequency, audit trails, and feature utilization. A t-test analysis comparing completion rates of course files and teaching portfolios revealed no significant difference, t(161) = 0.92, p = .36, indicating comparable effectiveness. Findings revealed that system features such as automated document compilation, completion status tracking, real-time WhatsApp notifications, and an intuitive interface contributed to improved compliance rates and reduced reliance on physical documentation. The system also offers centralized and quality-focused document management, enhancing consistency and streamlining academic documentation. Overall, the system received a high satisfaction rating (mean = 4.73/5), reflecting strong user acceptance. Despite being limited to a single faculty, the findings suggest strong scalability across institutions. Ultimately, the system serves as a strategic tool for enhancing audit readiness, strengthening quality assurance compliance, and supporting the digitalization of the academic quality management system in higher education.

References

Aliazas, J. V., Dela Cruz, R., & Ilagan, N. (2024). Enhancing university operations: A study of the electronic document management systems (EDMS) of one higher education institution. TWIST Journal, 19(3), 229–237.

Atabik, A., Nurfuadi, N., Hidayat, I., Masruri, M., & Nur, S. (2024). Digitalization of educational quality management in higher education. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18, e06776. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-133

Durmuş Şenyapar, H. N., & Bayındır, R. (2024). Quality assurance in higher education in the 21st century: Strategies and practices for new generation universities. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 5(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1573331

Engineering Accreditation Council. (2024). Engineering Programme Accreditation Standard 2024. Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM). https://www.eac.org.my

Engineering Technology Accreditation Council. (2024). Engineering Technician Education Programme Accreditation Standard 2024. Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM). https://www.etac.org.my

Etomes, S. E., Endeley, M. N., Aluko, F. R., & Tchombe, T. M. S. (2024). Transformational leadership for sustainable productivity in higher education institutions of Cameroon. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01334-7

Hussein, S. S., Ramly, N., Wan Ahmad, W. A. Z., Mohammed Ridzuan, M. I. A., Salehen, P. M. W., & Dang, D. (2024). Achieving sustainable digital transformation in TVET institutions through enterprise architecture. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 16(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.37134/jtet.vol16.2.11.2024

Iqbal, S., Taib, C. A. B., & Razalli, M. R. (2023). Examining the effect of accreditation on higher education performance through motivation as a mediator. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.46.10.3

Kanematsu, H., Ogawa, A., Kogo, T., Kawai, R., Barry, D. M., Ogawa, N., Suzuki, S., Hagiwara, G., & Kurita, K. (2024a). Digital innovation in faculty development: Crafting academic portfolios for the next era. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 4075–4083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.246

Kanematsu, H., Barry, D. M., Ishikawa, M., Kobayashi, T., & Shirai, T. (2024b). Digital portfolio system for engineering education: Enhancing documentation and outcome based learning. Computers & Education, 195, 105831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.105831

Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). (2021). Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation (COPPA) 2nd Edition. Malaysian Qualifications Agency. https://www2.mqa.gov.my

Mahmud, S. N. D., & Abdul Rahman, Z. (2020). Systems structure of education for sustainable development in higher education institutions. Creative Education, 9(15), Article ID 88736. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.915198

Manueke, S., & Manopo, M. W. (2019). Analysis of internal quality audit to improve the implementation of the higher education internal quality assurance system at the Manado State Polytechnic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology 2019 – Social Sciences Track (iCASTSS 2019), pp. 307–311. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icastss-19.2019.64

Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., & Mokhtar, U. A. (2021). Electronic records management systems and the competency of educational institutions. Information Development, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920980829

Odeh, A., & Odeh, H. (2019a). An online course file management system (OCFMS). International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology, 20(2), 9.1–9.7. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.20.02.09

Odeh, R., & Odeh, A. (2019b). Quality assurance in higher education institutions: Challenges and best practices. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2017-0372

Pengajian Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang. (2025). Unit Kualiti PKE UiTMCPP. https://sites.google.com/uitm.edu.my/unitkualitippkeuitmcpp/home?pli=1

Rais, N. B., Rashid, M., Zakria, M., Hussain, S., Qadir, J., & Imran, M. A. (2021). Employing industrial Quality Management Systems for quality assurance in outcome‑based engineering education: A review. Education Sciences, 11(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020045

Simkin, A., Mozhaeva, T., & Proskurin, A. (2019). The quality management system of additional professional education in higher educational institution on the basis of a standard quality system. MATEC Web of Conferences, 297, 06010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929706010

Wu, H. T. (2022). Establishing a digital real time learning system with push notifications. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 767389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767389

Xe, W. N. Y., Pang, V., & Hiew, W. (2019). A review of e-portfolios in Malaysian higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6515

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Sihab, N., Che Ani, A. I., & Zanal, A. (2026). Enhancing quality assurance and accreditation readiness through a digital portfolio in higher education. Journal of Administrative Science, 23(3), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i3.11538