Beyond a single answer: Student leaders' perspectives on essential leadership skills and leadership development in Malaysian higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i3.12839Keywords:
Student leadership, Leadership skills, Leadership development, Thematic analysis, Higher educationAbstract
Student leadership programs are more justifiable if the learning outcomes are aligned with the student leaders’ own conception of effective leadership. In this qualitative descriptive study, we explored the leadership competencies that student leaders believed were most important and actions they proposed to develop those competencies. During a leadership camp in July 2022, two open-ended survey questions were answered by seventy-eight students holding formal leadership positions from one Malaysian public university. Responses were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. The two questions were analysed separately and frequencies of categories were only used to describe the prominence of the coded content. Seven competency categories were identified; communication skills (28 coded respondent-category occurrences), responsibility and integrity (25), emotional intelligence (24), leadership and team management (19), decision-making and problem solving (13), resilience and work ethic (13), organization and time management (8). Proposed developmental activities were coded into three domains: personal leadership character (35 action occurrences), interpersonal competence (35), and leadership performance skills (17). The findings suggest student leadership is more of a constellation of relational, ethical, intrapersonal, and execution-oriented capacities than one dominant skill. They also observe an important difference between what participants valued and how they thought those capacities should be developed. Universities should thus incorporate reflective practice, ethical and relational learning and applied leadership tasks in coherent programs. The study used short answers from one institution so the framework should be seen as a starting point for interpretation of program design and further testing, not as a validated sequence of development.
References
Aeon, B., Faber, A., & Panaccio, A. (2021). Does time management work? A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245066
Al-Omari, A. A., & Al-Mughairi, Y. M. (2023). Leadership skills of undergraduate students at the Hashemite University and Sultan Qaboos University: Comparative study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 4(2), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.61186/johepal.4.2.58
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 517-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007
Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004
Gigliotti, R. A., & Spear, S. E. (2022). Essential leadership concepts and models for graduate and professional school learners. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2022(176), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20531
Gonzalez, J. L., Martinez, J. M., Lomboy, M., & Exposito, L. (2024). Study of emotional intelligence and leadership competencies in university students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2411826. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411826
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Haber-Curran, P., & Williamson, E. (2023). Emotional intelligence frameworks in leadership education. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2023(180), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20578
Harms, P. D., & Crede, M. (2010). Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350894
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Komives, S. R., Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J. E., Mainella, F. C., & Osteen, L. (2006). A leadership identity development model: Applications from a grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0048
Ledesma, J. (2014). Conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience in leadership. SAGE Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014545464
Ministry of Higher Education. (2026). Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint 2026-2035. https://www.mohe.gov.my/en/download/publications-journals-and-reports/malaysia-higher-education-blueprint
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7
Plantin Ewe, L., & Fjelkner Pihl, A. (2024). Relational competence in higher education: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2331354. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2331354
Saidi, Z. A., & Abd Aziz, M. F. (2025). Empowering student leadership in higher education: A literature review on key competencies for effective leadership. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 23(1), 478-500.
Wang, P. (2023). The connotation and influencing factors of student leadership. SHS Web of Conferences, 180, 04004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202318004004
Wilson, D. C. (2023). Defining leadership. Philosophy of Management, 22, 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00210-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zaidatul Shakila Mohamad Ashari, Zulfadli Mahfodz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



