Does The Virtue of Islam Gives Significant Impact on Social Enterprise?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v20i.2467Keywords:
social enterprise, ilamic social enterprise, SE, ISE, Index Measurement, Maqasid SyariahAbstract
The purpose of Islamic social enterprise is to carry out Islamic objectives in its activities and operations. The Islamic objective, which is known as maqasid syariah, is an essential foundation in any Islamic organization are designed to promote benefits and repel harms. Maqasid syariah calls for establishment of justice, elimination of unfairness and alleviation of private. Therefore, this study sought to see whether the instillation’s of ISE can contribute to the better social enterprises by using ISE index measurement as it involves the Shari‟ah compliant trading activities to ensure the sustainability of ISE. Without clear objectives, ISEs which emphasizes on the combination of economic and social objectives in an organization, might not be able to run their operations and activities smoothly.
References
Abraham, A. (2007). An Embedded Model for Understanding the Development of Accounting Control Systems In a Nonprofit Organisation. The Journal of Global Business Issues, 1(2), 1-9.
Austin, J., Gutiérrez, R., Ogliastri, E., & Reficco, E. (2006). Effective Management of Social Enterprises: Lessons from Businesses And Civil Society Organizations in Iberoamerica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2021). A Methodology for Analysing and Evaluating Narratives in Annual Reports: A Comprehensive Descriptive Profile and Metrics for Disclosure Quality Attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236.
Biancone, P. P., & Radwan, M. (2019). Social Finance and Financing Social Enterprises: An Islamic Finance Perspective. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 1-6.
Buhr, D. (2015). Social Innovation Policy for Industry 4.0. Tübingen, Germany: Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen.
Certo, T. S., & Miller, T. L. (2008). Social Entrepreneurship: Key Issues and Concepts. Business Horizons, 51, 267-271.
DiCicco-Bloom & Crabtree, (2006). The Qualitative Research Interviews. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321.
Dixon, K., Coy, D., & Tower, G. D. (1991). External Reporting by New Zealand Universities 1985 -1989: Improving Accountability. Financial Accountability & Management, 7, 159-178.
Emerson, J., Freundlich, T., & Fruchterman, J. (2020). Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained. Oxford Working Paper.
ESCAP, U., & Council, B. (2019). The State of Social Enterprise in Malaysia 2018.
Hisham Kamaruddin, M. I., & Auzair, S. M. (2019). Conceptualizing Islamic Social
Enterprise (ISE) from the Islamic perspective. International Journal of
Management, Accounting, and Economics, 6(4), 368-381.
Kamaruddin, M. I. H., & Auzair, S. M. (2020). Measuring ‘Islamic Accountability’ in Islamic Social Enterprise (ISE). International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management,13(2),303-321.
Laporan Tahunan JPPM (2021). Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia, Kementerian Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri, Kuala Lumpur.
Marston, C. L., & Shrives, P. J. (1991). The use of Disclosure Indices in Accounting Research: A Review of Article. British Accounting Review, 23(3), 195-210.
Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., & Neves, C. M. (2018). Scale Development: Ten Main Limitations and Recommendations to Improve Future Research Practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30(3).
Mulyaningsih, H. D., & Ramadani, V. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship in an Islamic Context. Entrepreneurship and Management in an Islamic Context, 143-158.
Nelson, M., Fisher, J., Tower, G., & Banks, W. (1997). A Comparison of University Accountability in Australia and Canada. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 4(1), 36-46.
New Straits Times (2017). 2018 Budget: RM50 Mil Boost for NGO Activities to Address Social Ills.
Olanrewaju, A. S., Shahbudin, A. S. M., & Zakariyah, H. (2020). A Synthesis of the Islamic Social Finance for Sustainable Islamic Social Enterprise: A Four Factor of Production Frame. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(19), 9963-9974.
Perego, P., & Verbeeten, F. (2018). Do ‘Good Governance’ Codes Enhance Financial Accountability Evidence from Managerial Pay in Dutch Charities. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 316-344.
Raj, S. (2015). Let the ‘Blind Lead The Blind’, Say Distraught Visually Impaired Community-ASTRO AWANI. Retrieved from http://english.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/let-blind-lead-blindsay-distraught-visually-impared-community-55902.
Tower, D., & Dixon, K. (1994). Public Sector Reform in New Zealand: The Progress of Tertiary Education Annual Reports, 1990-92. Financial Accountability & Management, 10(3), 253-261.
Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2011). Can Resource Dependence and Coercive Isomorphism Explain Nonprofit Organizations' Compliance with Reporting Standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 5-32.
Zahra, S., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D., & Shulman, J. (2019). A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes, and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Saunah Zainon, Soo Kum Yoke, Rahimah Mohamed Yunos, Nurul Huda Md Yatim, Rashidah Mokhtar, Nur Eyliawati Japelus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
