Enhancing the effectiveness of FSPPP’s Graduate Researchers in Print (GRiP) through a holistic and comprehensive research ecosystem framework: A pathway to promote research excellence among postgraduate students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v15i1.2765Keywords:
Effectiveness, FSPPP’s Graduate Researchers in Print (GRiP), Research Ecosystem Framework, Research ExcellenceAbstract
FSPPP’s Graduate Researchers in Print (GRiP) is a program designed to support research students in their academic writing, particularly thesis writing. This program is an emulation of the GRiP program introduced by the Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Australia. At present, the GRiP program is widely implemented in many Australian universities as it has been proven to be effective in assisting research students in their thesis writing and research completion. The FSPPP-GRiP program has been officially implemented since 10th March 2016, with a number of 16 participants: 8 Master and 8 Ph.D. students. After six months of the program implementation, the participants were interviewed to gather their feedback regarding the program’s effectiveness at three different levels: individual level, peer support and assistance from the GRiP’s coordinator. The findings of this study reveal that the participants have marked significant improvement at the individual level which can be seen from their academic writing (amount, quality, and improvement in writing skills and techniques), which has increased their study commitment, improved their communication repertoire alongside acted as a driving factor in propelling the participants to complete their study on time. The effectiveness of the GRiP program can also be seen from the peer support level. Peers and their research progress are recognized as benchmarks for other GRiP participants. They learn from each other’s experiences (process and procedures, formatting, referencing, style of writing, writing techniques and structure), as well as obtaining support and motivation to complete their study. Learning from peers has made them feel less stressful and lonely in conducting their research. Notably, the role of the GRiP coordinator is prominently effective in facilitating discussions among GRiP participants, verifying the information and feedback from the participants, advising the participants about process and procedures and continuously support and motivate the participants to produce a sound thesis and complete their studies on time. This study concludes that the effectiveness of the GRiP program can be seen from individual, peer and coordinator levels. To further enhance research culture among students at the faculty, a holistic framework of the GRiP ecosystem is proposed. To excel in research, all parties have pertinent roles in assisting and supporting research students in their research journey—this can only be achieved through a holistic and comprehensive research ecosystem framework as proposed in this study.
References
A Majid, F., Mohd Shukor, N. H., & Radzi, F. A. (2010. The learning strategies of successful research graduates: A survey on the Malaysian PhD holders. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 9-27.
Amstrong, T. (2015). ‘Peer feedback in disciplinary writing for publication in English: The case of ‘Rollo’ a German-L1 Novice Scholar’. Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1, Spring 2015, pp. 86-105.
Bair, M.A. & Mader, C.E. (2013). ‘Academic writing at the graduate level: Improving the curriculum through Faculty collaboration’. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 10, no. 1, article 4, pp. 1-14.
Barbeiro, L. F., Pareira, L. A. & Carvalho, J. B. (2015). Writing at Portugese Universities: Perceptions and practices. Journal of Academic Writing, 5(1), 74-85.
Biber, D. & Gray, B. (2010). ‘Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2-20.
Bickford, C. (2015). ‘Increasing student responsibility in revision efforts: Redefining and restructuring peer response with millennial generation’. Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1, Spring 2015, pp. 145-156.
Buttler, G. (2011). ‘Supervisor perceptions of the academic literacy requirements of postgraduate students at the University of Pretoria’. Journal of Language Teaching, vol. 45, no. 1.
Carvalho, J. B. (2012). Moving from graduation to post-graduation in Portuguese universities: Changing literacy practices, facing new difficulties. Journal of Academic Writing, 2(1), 14-23.
Casanave, C.P. & Hubbard, P. (1992). ‘The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty’s perception, pedagogical issues and needed research’. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33-49.
Council of Graduate Schools (2016), ‘The crucial issue of doctoral non-completion’, retrieved on 24 January 2017, from http://cgsnet.org/cgs-occasional-paperseries/university-georgia/chapter-1.
Cuthbert, D. & Spark, C. (2008). ‘Getting GRiP: Examining the outcomes of a pilot program to support graduate research students in writing for publication’. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 33, no.1, pp. 77-88.
Ezebilo, E. E. (2012). Challenges in postgraduate studies: Assessment by Doctoral students in a Swedish University. Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 49-57.
Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199-227.
Gonzalez, J. C. (2006). Academic socialization experiences of Latina Doctoral Students: A qualitative understanding of support systems that aid and challenges that hinder the process. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 5(4), 347-365.
Hellen, F. (1994). Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill.
Holtman, L., & Mukwada, G. (2014). Challenges confronting the quality of postgraduate research supervision and its effects on time-to-degree and throughtput rates: A case of a South African University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 179-190.
Ismail, A. & Abiddin, N. Z. (2009). Service attributes of graduate research students’ needs in a Malaysian University. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(6), 323-338.
Kirchhoff, L. (2016). ‘Motivation in the writing centre: A peer tutor’s experience’. Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 6, no. 1, Autumn 2016, pp. 31-40.
McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an interactive framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3-17.
Mehar Sigh, M.K. (2015). ‘International graduate students’ academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions’. Journal of International Student, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12-22.
Mohan, B.A. & Lo, W.A. (1985). ‘Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and development factor’. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 3 (September 1985), pp. 515-534).
Monash University (2010). Arts PhD and Masters students get a GRiP on writing. Retrieved on 21st January 2017 from http://adm.monash.edu/recordsarchives/archives/memo-archive/2004-2007/stories/20060531/grip.html.
Mutula, S. M. (2009). Challenges of postgraduate research: Global context, African perspectives. Key Note Address Delivered at the University of Zululand, 10th DLIS Annual Conference, from 9 - 10 September 2009. Retrieved on 21 January 2017 from http://www.lis.uzulu.ac.za/2009/Mutula-UZ2009DLISPaper.pdf.
Nzekwe-Excel, C. (2015). ‘Academic writing workshops: Impact of attendance on performance’. Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 4. No. 1.
Othman, W.H. & Abu Bakar, A.L. (2009). ‘Learning to write an academic paper among medical students of University Malaysia Sabah’. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL) 2009. INTI University College, Malaysia.
Raisig, S. & Vode, D. (2016). ‘A workshop to help students integrate sources into their writing’. Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 6, no. 1, Autumn 2016, pp. 222-251.
Shafie, L.A. Maesin, A., Osman, N., Nayan, S. & Mansor, M. (2010). ‘Understanding collaborative academic writing among beginers University writers in Malaysia’.Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 58-69.
Smallwood, S. (2004). Doctor dropout: High attrition from Ph.D programs is sucking away time, talent and money and breaking some hearts too. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 (19), A 10.
The Sun Daily. (2014). PhD numbers to fulfil national goals. Retrieved on 24 January 2017, from http://m.thesundaily.my/node/263913.
Wisker, G. (2001). The postgraduate research handbook: Succeed with your MS, MPhil, EdD and PhD. New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAIN.
Woodford, B. (2005). How to mentor graduate students: A guide for faculty at a diverse university. Seattle, WA: The Graduate School, University of Washington.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Yarina Ahmad, Posiah Mohd Isa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
