Breaking the silence: A conservation of Resources Theory Perspective on voice behaviour in public sector organizations

Authors

  • Mohamad Nasaruddin Mahdzir Hospital Al-Sultan Abdullah, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nor Faridah Ahmad Roslan Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rohayu Abdul Ghani Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Zaleha Yazid Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i3.9315

Keywords:

Conservation of Resources Theory, Voice behaviour, Public sector, Resources passageway, Resource spirals

Abstract

Employee voice, the discretionary expression of ideas, concerns, or criticisms aimed at improving organizational functioning, has become an indispensable asset in public governance. Despite its recognised value for accountability, learning, and innovation, silence remains pervasive in public organizations, reflecting a paradox between the need for open communication and the dominance of bureaucratic reticence. This article advances a novel theoretical integration by applying the Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory to explain the dynamics of voice behaviour (VB) in public-sector contexts. COR Theory posits that individuals strive to acquire, retain, and protect valued resources while avoiding loss. When analysed through this lens, voice emerges as a resource transaction: employees weigh the potential gains of speaking up; recognition, influence, and trust versus the risks of resource loss, including damaged reputations, strained leader relationships, or career jeopardy. In the public sector, where rigid hierarchies, political oversight, and cultural norms amplify these risks, silence is often the rational choice. Drawing on a systematic literature review and qualitative analysis of empirical studies, this article identifies five critical issues constraining voice in public organizations: bureaucratic hierarchies, fear of retaliation, symbolic voice policies, cultural norms of deference, and resource ambiguity. Findings suggest that leadership style and organizational climate function as critical “resource passageways”, determining whether VB generates gain spirals of engagement or loss spirals of withdrawal. The article contributes theoretically to organizational behaviour and offers practical recommendations for policymakers and leaders seeking to transform public institutions from cultures of silence into cultures of constructive voice.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. In Bock, G. W. and Young-Gul, K (Vol. 15). J. Wiley.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.

Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., & Vaara, E. (2023). Ambiguity in Organization Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009358460

Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Voice and Its Promotive and Prohibitive Forms: Identification of Key Associations, Distinctions, and Future Research Directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. (4th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.

Dai, Y., Li, H., Xie, W., & Deng, T. (2022). Power Distance Belief and Workplace Communication: The Mediating Role of Fear of Authority. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052932

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-Determination in Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183

Duan, J., Bao, C., Huang, C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2018). Authoritarian Leadership and Employee Silence in China. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.61

Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386

Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Info Libr J., 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “Conservation of Resources.” Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130

Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2015). To Invest or Not? The Role of Coworker Support and Trust in Daily Reciprocal Gain Spirals of Helping Behavior. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1628–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455246

Hassan, S., DeHart‐Davis, L., & Jiang, Z. (2019). How Empowering Leadership reduces Employee Silence in Public Organizations. Public Administration, 97(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12571

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of Resource Caravans and Engaged Settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Iddrisu, I. (2025). Navigating Governance: Trust as a Mediator in the Dynamics of Corruption, Freedom, and Public Sector Performance. Public Integrity, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2025.2554407

Joseph, S., & Shetty, N. (2022). An Empirical Study on the impact of Employee Voice and Silence on Destructive Leadership and Organizational Culture. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11(S1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-022-00155-0

Kim, T., & Cho, W. (2024). Employee Voice Opportunities Enhance Organizational Performance When Faced With Competing Demands. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 44(4), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X231190327

Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services. Governance, 33(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The Job Demands-Resources Model: A Meta-analytic review of Longitudinal Studies. Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065

Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176

Liang, T.-L., Chang, H.-F., Ko, M.-H., & Lin, C.-W. (2017). Transformational Leadership and Employee Voices in the Hospitality Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2015-0364

Lim, S., Goh, E.-Y., Tay, E., Tong, Y. K., Chung, D., Devi, K., Tan, C. H., & Indran, I. R. (2022). Disruptive Behavior in a High-power Distance Culture and a Three-dimensional Framework for Curbing it. Health Care Management Review, 47(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000315

Mahdzir, M. N., & Ghani, R. A. (2022). The Impact of Positive Leadership Styles on Organizational Innovative Behaviour: A Thematic Review. NeuroQuantology, 20(8), 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.8.NQ44146

Monteiro, P., & Adler, P. S. (2022). Bureaucracy for the 21st Century: Clarifying and Expanding Our View of Bureaucratic Organization. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 427–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0059

Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee Voice and Silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328

Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. M. (2022). Strategic or Silencing? Line Managers’ Repurposing of Employee Voice Mechanisms for High Performance. British Journal of Management, 33(2), 1054–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12469

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee Voice Behavior: A Meta‐analytic Test of the Conservation of Resources Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.754

Sibunruang, H., & Kawai, N. (2024). The Proactive Nature of Employee Voice: The Facilitating Role of Supervisor Developmental Feedback. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(4), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.38

Tian, X., Chae, H., Song, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Leader Prohibitive Voice Shapes Employee Voice through Psychological Safety moderated by Self-efficacy and Generational Differences. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 31469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17500-5

Ullah, S., Ismail, M., Bilal, M., & Akbar, U. (2023). Impact of Perceived Organizational Politics on Employee Voice behavior. NICE Research Journal, 16(2), 23–60. https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.v16i2.415

Urbancová, H., Vrabcová, P., & Pacáková, Z. (2024). Communication from Below: Feedback from Employees as a Tool for their Stabilisation. Heliyon, 10(7), e28287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28287

Wu, X., & Ma, F. (2022). How Chinese Employees’ Voice Behavior Is Motivated: The Role of Perceived Overqualification. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.736043

Yang, J., Wang, B., Liao, Y., Yang, F., & Qian, J. (2025). Silence as a Quiet Strategy: Understanding the Consequences of Workplace Ostracism Through the Lens of Sociometer Theory. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081022

Zheng, Y., Epitropaki, O., Graham, L., & Caveney, N. (2022). Ethical Leadership and Ethical Voice: The Mediating Mechanisms of Value Internalization and Integrity Identity. Journal of Management, 48(4), 973–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002611

Zheng, Y., Graham, L., Farh, J.-L., & Huang, X. (2021). The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Ethical Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model of Felt Uncertainty and Leader Benevolence. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04261-1

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Mahdzir, M. N., Roslan, N. F. A., Ghani, R. A., & Yazid, Z. (2026). Breaking the silence: A conservation of Resources Theory Perspective on voice behaviour in public sector organizations. Journal of Administrative Science, 23(3), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v23i3.9315