Contemporary Issues on Recalibrating the Constitutional Role of the Rulers in Malaysia’s Legislative Process

Authors

  • Norazlina Abdul Aziz Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Fikri Othman Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rosa Ristawati Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jels.v1i1.1005

Keywords:

Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Royal Assent, Legislative Process, Constitutional Monarchy, Malaysian Law

Abstract

The constitutional role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (YDPA) and the Conference of Rulers in Malaysia’s legislative process reflects the complex interaction between constitutional monarchy, parliamentary democracy and constitutional supremacy. Although federal legislative authority is vested in Parliament under Article 44 of the Federal Constitution, Parliament constitutionally comprises the YDPA, the Dewan Negara and the Dewan Rakyat. The King therefore occupies a constitutionally recognised position within the legislative institution, although this role differs from the deliberative and voting functions performed by the two Houses. This article examines the historical and constitutional foundations of royal participation in Malaysia’s legislative process, focusing particularly on Articles 38, 44, 55, 66 and 159 of the Federal Constitution. It considers the transformation of royal assent following the constitutional controversies of 1983–1984 and the constitutional amendments concerning royal immunity in 1993, which significantly influenced the constitutional relationship between the monarchy and elected institutions. The article further distinguishes the individual constitutional responsibilities of the YDPA from the collective functions of the Conference of Rulers, particularly concerning consultation and consent in legislative matters. Employing a doctrinal legal research approach, the study analyses relevant constitutional provisions, historical developments and contemporary constitutional practices to examine emerging issues surrounding the legislative powers of the YDPA and the State Rulers. It evaluates whether the existing constitutional framework provides sufficient clarity in preserving the appropriate institutional balance between the monarchy, legislature and executive within Malaysia’s evolving constitutional democracy. The article concludes that greater procedural clarity is necessary to distinguish consultation from constitutionally required consent and to establish effective mechanisms for identifying proposed legislation affecting constitutionally protected royal interests, thereby strengthening constitutional compliance, institutional accountability and respect for constitutional supremacy.

References

Abdul Aziz, N., Mohamad Mangsor, M., & Mohd Yusoff, M. F. S. (2024). The Malaysian monarchy system: A review of the literature. In R. Abdul Rahman, M. F. Labanieh, M. Z. Haq, Z. Mohamed Yusoff, & A. S. Abd. Aziz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th UUM International Legal Conference 2023 (UUMILC 2023) (pp. 282–294). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-352-8_22

Abdul Aziz, N., & Ristawati, R. (2020). The constitutional power of the executive in the age of rule of law: A comparative study on Malaysia and Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 3(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.3.2.1857.75-83

Abdul Aziz, N., Saripan, H., Mohamad Mangsor, M., & Ristawati, R. (2023). Beyond the monarch: Rulers and the policy environment in Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(26), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8i26.5196

Abdul Raof, N., Abdul Aziz, N., Omar, N., Othman, R., & Mat Salleh, H. (2025). Exploring the depths: A comparative analysis of doctrinal and non-doctrinal legal research. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 6(5), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2025.5.13

Abdul Razak, A. M., & Wan Hasan, W. N. (2021). A reappraisal on the constitutional functions of the Crown, the Parliament and the judiciary to defend Malaysian constitutionalism. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.54313/journalmp.v1i.37

Ahamat, H., & Alias, N. (2018). The evolution of the personality of the Malay Sultanate States. In I. de la Rasilla & A. Shahid (Eds.), International law and Islam: Historical explorations (pp. 249–276). Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004388376_013

Ahmed, M., Kausar, R., & Behan, R. A. (2016). Analysis of democratic constitutional monarchy: A case study of political system of Malaysia. Asia-Pacific—Annual Research Journal of Far East & South East Asia, 34, 76–90. https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/ASIA-PACIFIC/article/view/665

Ali Mohamed, A. A., & Ahmad, M. H. (Eds.). (2022). Constitutional law in Malaysia. LexisNexis.

Ang, H. L., & Whiting, A. (2013). Federalism and legal unification in Malaysia. In D. Halberstam & M. Reimann (Eds.), Federalism and legal unification: A comparative empirical investigation of twenty systems (pp. 295–337). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7398-1_12

A Rahman, N. A. (2021). Accountability in the parliament of Malaysia: A study on interruptions by the chairperson in the Dewan Rakyat [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bonn]. bonndoc. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-63715

Azlan Shah. (1982). The role of constitutional rulers: A Malaysian perspective for the laity. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 9(1–2), 1–18. https://ajba.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/15350

Azmi, Z. (2021). Government’s powers during an emergency. Journal of the Malaysian Parliament, 1, 18–37. https://doi.org/10.54313/journalmp.v1i.29

Cox, N. (2020). The royal prerogative and constitutional law: A search for the quintessence of executive power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003048718

Dzulkifli, F. Z., & Mohd Zameri, N. D. (2010). The functions of constitutional monarchy in Malaysian political system: The perceptions of Malay community. In Political managements and policies in Malaysia: Proceedings of the Seminar on Nasional Resilience (SNAR 2010) (pp. 353–369). Institute of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s Thoughts, Universiti Utara Malaysia. https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/3182/

Faruqi, S. S. (2005). The Malaysian Constitution, the Islamic state, and hudud laws. In K. S. Nathan & M. H. Kamali (Eds.), Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, social and strategic challenges for the 21st century (pp. 256–277). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812306241

Faruqi, S. S. (2019a). Our constitution. Sweet & Maxwell.

Faruqi, S. S. (2019b, December 10). Our constitution—Our document of destiny. Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. https://www.isis.org.my/2019/12/10/malaysias-constitutional-fundamentals-no-1-of-a-series-of-tun-hussein-onn-chair-in-international-studies-essays-on-the-federal-constitution-2/

Faruqi, S. S. (2020, March 26). Appointment of a prime minister (No. 3 of the Tun Hussein Onn Chair in International Studies essay series). Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. https://www.isis.org.my/2020/03/26/appointment-of-a-prime-minister-no-3-of-a-series-of-essays-by-the-tun-hussein-onn-chair-in-international-studies/

Fernando, J. M. (2014). Defending the monarchy: The Malay rulers and the making of the Malayan constitution, 1956–1957. Archipel, 88, 149–167. https://journals.openedition.org/archipel/528

Fernando, J. M., & Ling, H. H. (2015). British and Commonwealth legacies in the framing of the Malayan constitution, 1956–1957. Britain and the World, 8(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.3366/brw.2015.0190

Fisher, M. H. (1984). Indirect rule in the British Empire: The foundations of the residency system in India (1764–1858). Modern Asian Studies, 18(3), 393–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00009033

Foo, R., & Tan, A. (2018). Separation of powers in “new Malaysia”: Hope and expectations. Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5(2), 529–567. https://www.jicl.org.uk/storage/journals/November2020/iXqvvmB8iYsXBEA31zk0.pdf

Gillen, M. R. (1994). The Malay Rulers’ loss of immunity (Occasional Paper No. 6). University of Victoria, Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives. https://www.uvic.ca/research/centres/capi/assets/docs/Gillen_Malay_Rulers.pdf

Harding, A. (1996). Law, government and the constitution in Malaysia. Kluwer Law International.

Harding, A. (2022). The constitution of Malaysia: A contextual analysis (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing.

Harding, A., & Kumarasingham, H. (2022). The Malay monarchies in constitutional and social conception. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.32

Hickling, R. H. (1984). Malaysia: Constitution (Amendment) Act 1983 and Constitution (Amendment) Act 1984. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 11(1–2), 213–218. https://jati.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/15941

Hutchinson, T. (2025). Doctrinal research. In D. Watkins & M. Burton (Eds.), Research methods in law (3rd ed., pp. 8–38). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032710372-2

Jalil, F. (2007). Judicial accountability: A study of Malaysia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick]. Warwick Research Archive Portal. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/163817/

Jones, D. S. (1995). Resolving the constitutional question of the Malaysian king and rulers. Asian Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185379508434051

Lee, H. P. (1993). Hereditary rulers and legal immunities in Malaysia. University of Tasmania Law Review, 12(2), 323–336. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UTasLawRw/1993/17.pdf

Lee, H. P., Foo, R., & Tan, A. (2019). Constitutional change in Malaysia. The Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), 119–138.

Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(4), 559–563. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167

Md Damiri, M. D., Pakhriazad, H. Z., Paiman, B., & Mohd Hasmadi, I. (2023). Revisiting British Malaya’s era: An intriguing historical legal analysis of land administration and colonial forestry. Journal of Politics and Law, 16(4), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n4p27

Md Yusof, M. A., Hamzah, R., & Faruqi, S. S. (Eds.). (2020). Law, principles and practice in the Dewan Rakyat (House of Representatives) of Malaysia. Sweet & Maxwell.

Milner, A. (2020). Malaysia’s multi-monarchy: Surviving colonisation and decolonisation. In R. Aldrich & C. McCreery (Eds.), Monarchies and decolonisation in Asia (pp. 95–111). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526142702.00011

Mohamad Mangsor, M., Abdul Aziz, N., Rahmat, N. E., & Zainudin, A. H. (2021). Modelling Lockean legalism in the executive emergency power on environment and climate change domain in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(5), 774–784. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i5/10032

Neo, J. L. C. (2012). Change and continuity: The constitutional head of state and democratic transitions in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal, 5, i–xxiv.

Osman, S. K. (2025). Democracy and the constitutional monarchy in Malaysia: A constitutional analysis of monarchical discretion and democratic legitimacy, 1983–2022. JAWI, 8(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.24042/00202582772300

Rawlings, H. F. (1986). The Malaysian constitutional crisis of 1983. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/35.2.237

Samsudin, N. M. I., Salleh, S. N. F. A., Atiyah, G. A., & Kambol, R. (2025). A systematic analysis of the interrelationship between Yang di-Pertuan Agong’s power as the head of Islam and his discretionary powers. Global Journal al-Thaqafah, 32–55. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI102025-3

Sarwar, M. I., & Ananth, S. (2016). The National Security Council bill: A colorable exercise of power. Malayan Law Journal, 2, cxix–cxli. https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/The%20National%20Security%20Council%20-%20Bill%20A%20Colorable%20Exercise%20of%20Power.MLJ2016.pdf

Shah, D. (2022). The ‘three Rs’ in Malaysia’s struggle for constitutional democracy. Federal Law Review, 50(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X221087460

Stockwell, A. J. (1988). Princes and politicians: The constitutional crisis in Malaysia, 1983–4. In D. A. Low (Ed.), Constitutional heads and political crises: Commonwealth episodes, 1945–85 (pp. 182–197). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10197-9_11

Stockwell, A. J. (2010). Merdeka! Looking back at Independence Day in Malaya, 31 August 1957. In R. Holland, S. Williams, & T. Barringer (Eds.), The iconography of independence: ‘Freedoms at midnight’ (pp. 113–130). Routledge.

Sundara Raja, S. (2015). The early British administrators in the Malay states, 1874–1909. SEJARAH: Journal of the Department of History, 24(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.22452/sejarah.vol24no1.3

Taekema, S. (2018). Theoretical and normative frameworks for legal research: Putting theory into practice. Law and Method, 2018(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000031

Tan, K. Y. L., & Neo, J. L. (Eds.). (2023). Constitutional principles and institutions: Text, cases & materials. Sweet & Maxwell.

UM Consti Team. (2025, January 22). Episode 33: Royal immunity. https://www.umconstiteam.com/post/episode-33-royal-immunity

Varuhas, J. N. E. (2023). Mapping doctrinal methods. In P. Daly & J. Tomlinson (Eds.), Researching public law in common law systems (pp. 70–103). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Wan Husain, W. A. F. (2021). Watanic jurisprudence: Articulating the legitimate elements of the basic structure of the Federal Constitution. IIUM Law Journal, 29(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i1.650

Wong, C.-H., & Yeoh, T. (2026). Malaysia’s centralised federalism: Shaped by (de)colonisation, communalism and the Cold War, now strained by democratisation. In V. K. Tandon, L. Gillot-Assayag, & C. Forster (Eds.), Federal theories and practices: Dynamics of federalism and democracy in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 191–224). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-19959-1_9

Yang, Y., & Khalid, N. A. (2024). System of government: The parliamentary democracy in Malaysia [Academic poster]. ScienceOpen Posters. https://doi.org/10.14293/P2199-8442.1.SOP-.PTEVJP.v1

Downloads

Published

30.10.2026

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Abdul Aziz, N., Othman, M. F., & Ristawati, R. (2026). Contemporary Issues on Recalibrating the Constitutional Role of the Rulers in Malaysia’s Legislative Process. Journal of Emerging Legal Studies, 1(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.24191/jels.v1i1.1005

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.