University-Rural Partnership Framework: A Systematic Approach to Sustainable Rural Development Through Higher Education Engagement
Keywords:
university-rural partnership, third mission, rural revitalization, community participation, implementation roadmap, assessmentAbstract
Universities are increasingly expected to fulfill their “third mission” by contributing to rural revitalization through sustained, evidence-based community engagement. Following PRISMA guidelines, this study systematically reviews international and Chinese literature (2000–2024) from major databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and Peking University Law School. It develops a three-layer framework—strategic fit, operational pathways, and enabling conditions—and proposes a phased roadmap comprising diagnosis and joint planning, pilot co-creation, promotion, and evaluation. Two illustrative cases from recent Chinese studies demonstrate how university–community collaboration enhances rural resilience and project sustainability. The study further identifies measurable outputs (e.g., talent development, technology transfer, farmers’ income, governance participation) and related feedback mechanisms. This research integrates dispersed practices into a systematic, transnationally applicable framework with practical implementation and evaluation guidance.
References
Han, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). The practice of universities helping poor villages to get out of poverty under the background of rural revitalization: A case study of Anhui University of Science and Technology helping Wangxiangpu Village in Linquan County, Anhui Province. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26(21), 30–32.
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., … Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Lang, W., Gkartzios, M., Yan, J., Chen, T., & Tan, S. (2024). Community co-creation through knowledge (co)production: The engagement of universities in promoting rural revitalization in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 103455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103455
Li, J., Leeuwis, C., Heerink, N., & Zhang, W. (2022). The Science and Technology Backyard as a local-level innovation intermediary in rural China. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 9(4), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022465
Liu, S. (2023). The implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy and land system reform (pp. 53–85). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6733-9_2
Mu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2006). On paths for universities and colleges to join in building a new countryside. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7312.2006.04.002
Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ou, H. (2024). Research on labor education in colleges and universities from the perspective of rural revitalization. https://doi.org/10.62517/jlsa.202407105
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Tetzlaff, J. M. (2021b). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.
Song, L., Peng, Y., & He, L. (2021). Working model and practical path of colleges and universities assisting rural revitalization. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 36(2), 117–124.
Song, W. (2022). Working model and practical exploration of local colleges and universities assisting rural revitalization. Village Committee Director, (9), 88–90.
Yan, J., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2023). Jointly creating sustainable rural communities through participatory planning: A case study of Fengqing (Hongtang Village), China. Land, 12(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010187
Yan, J., Huang, Y., Tan, S., Lang, W., & Chen, T. (2023). Jointly Creating Sustainable Rural Communities through Participatory Planning: A Case Study of Fengqing (Hongtang Village), China. Land, 12(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010187
Yun, W. S., Lada, S., Chekima, B., Ahmad, S. N. B., Ansar, R., Madli, F., & Ayub, M. S. (2023). We Care Programme: Uplift and Educational Support at Bondulu Children’s Home Toboh, Tambunan, Sabah, Malaysia. IMPACTS: International Journal of Empowerment and Community Services, 2(1), 16-24.
Zhang, Y. (2024). Research on rural education in the context of rural revitalization. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 52(1), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/52/20241541
