Exploring Factors Influencing Rural Consumers’ Selection of Vegetable Market Outlets
Keywords:
Consumer Preferences, Purchasing Behaviour, Vegetable Market OutletsAbstract
Rural consumer purchasing behaviour has evolved significantly with the increasing accessibility of diverse market outlets, leading to changes in how rural communities decide where to buy daily essentials such as vegetables. In Langkap, Hilir Perak, rural consumers can choose from supermarkets, wet markets, farmers’ markets, and mini markets, yet the factors influencing these choices remain unclear. To address this gap, this study applied the fuzzy VIKOR method to identify and rank the key criteria influencing market outlet selection and to determine the most preferred outlet among 88 primary grocery buyers. Four criteria, which are convenience, freshness, price, and social connection were evaluated across four different natures of market outlets: Econsave Supermarket, Public Market, Pasar Tani, and Fresh Mart. The analysis revealed that convenience was the most influential factor (weightage = 7.818), and the Public Market was the most preferred outlet with the lowest VIKOR index value (0.000). These findings provide valuable insights for retailers, farmers, and local authorities to enhance rural market strategies, improve infrastructure, and strengthen supply decisions to better meet consumer preferences.
References
Adanacioglu, H. (2021). Factors affecting the purchase behaviour of farmers’ markets consumers. PLoS ONE, 16(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255435
Anchal Arora, Nishu Rani, Chandrika Devi, & Sanjay Gupta. (2022). Factors affecting consumer purchase intentions of organic food through fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(5), 1085–1103.
Ayouni, S., Menzli, L. J., Hajjej, F., Maddeh, M., & Al-Otaibi, S. (2021). Fuzzy Vikor Application for Learning Management Systems Evaluation in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(2), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2021040102
Bhalaji, R. K. A., Bathrinath, S., & Saravanasankar, S. (2021). A Fuzzy VIKOR method to analyze the risks in lean manufacturing implementation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.123
Chaiyaphan, C., & Ransikarbum, K. (2020). Criteria Analysis of Food Safety using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-A Case study of Thailand’s Fresh Markets. E3S Web of Conferences, 141. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014102001
Chopra, A., Sachdeva, A., & Bhardwaj, A. (2022). Selection of appropriate maintenance strategy using fuzzy VIKOR technique: application in paper industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(5), 1226–1248. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2020-0070
Ha, T. M., Hansson, H., Abu Hatab, A., Darr, D., & Shakur, S. (2022). A risk-benefit approach to the purchase and consumption of conventional vegetables in wet markets. Appetite, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106142
Heinsalu, S. (2021). Competitive pricing despite search costs when lower price signals quality. Economic Theory, 71(1), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-020-01247-3
Jana, S., Sarkar, B., & Parekh, R. (2022). An Integrated Framework for the Performance Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetable Store Located in a Supermarket. Trends in Sciences, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.2073
Kabir, A. N. M. F., Alam, M. J., Begum, I. A., & McKenzie, A. M. (2023). Consumers’ preference for purchasing vegetables in Bangladesh: What matters? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100685
Kaya, A., Başhan, V., & Ust, Y. (2022). Selection of marine type air compressor by using fuzzy VIKOR methodology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 236(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902211028791
Koppiahraj, K., Bathrinath, S., & Saravanasankar, S. (2021). A fuzzy VIKOR approach for selection of ergonomic assessment method. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.725
Opricovic, S., & Duckstein, L. (1979). Multi-objective optimization in water resources planning. Proc. of the XVIII Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Researchpp, 10–14.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Ostojić, A., Vračar, L., & Jalić, N. (2023). Consumer attitudes about purchasing and consuming vegetables in the Republic of Srpska. АГРОЗНАЊЕ, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.7251/agren2303133o
Tambo, J. A., Kansiime, M. K., Alaganthiran, J. R., Danish, M., Duah, S. A., Faisal, S., Khonje, M. G., Mbugua, F., & Rajendran, G. (2024). Consumer pesticide concerns and the choice of fruit and vegetable markets in five low- and middle-income countries. Global Food Security, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100801
Yin, Z., Li, B., Li, S., Ding, J., & Zhang, L. (2022). Key influencing factors of green vegetable consumption in Beijing, China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102907
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control , 8(3), 338–353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Fazliana Rahim, Noorzila Sharif, Nur Syuhada Mazlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
