PREFERRED LEARNING APPROACHES, LEARNING METHODS AND LEARNING ENVIRONTMENTS: A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SARAWAK, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Senian Malie Faculty of Business Management, Unversiti Teknologi MARA, Sarawak
  • Oriah Akir Faculty of Business Management, Unversiti Teknologi MARA, Sarawak

Keywords:

Learning approach, learning method, learning environment, deep learning approach, surface learning approach

Abstract

Employers have been critical about graduates’ lack of employable qualities. One of
the steps to improve students’ quality is to understand their learning approach. Thus,
the aims of this research are: to determine the impact of students’ learning
approaches on their academic performance, to rank the learning methods and
learning environments preferred by them. The instruments used are the Revised SPQ,
and Jarvis and Woodrow’s learning environments and methods. The subjects (N =
400) of this study were undergraduates students of Universiti Teknologi MARA
Sarawak. The survey used self-administered questionnaire. The key findings were:
students using deep learning approach performed better academically than those
using surface learning approach; lecture, and hearing and explanation are preferred
by most students. In line with the findings, program management and academician
need to tailor their teaching with students’ specific needs. Furthermore, program
management needs to plan intervention programs – such as effective study skills – to
encourage students to be more independent, learn in groups and be more resourceful
learners.

References

Biggs, J.B. (1979). Individual differences in study process and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher

Education, 8: 381-384.

Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., and Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process

Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 133-149.

Chan, G., and Watkins, D. (1994). Classroom environment and approaches to learning: An

investigation of the actual and preferred perceptions of Hong Kong secondary school students.

Instructional Science, 22: 233-246.

Coffield F.J, Moseley D.V, Hall E. and Ecclestone K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles?

What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre / University

of Newcastle upon Tyne.

Dunn R (1991) How learning style changes over time. Presentation at the 14th Annual Leadership

Institute 'Teaching students through their individual learning styles' (New York July 7-13).

Entwistle, N. (1998). Conceptions of learning, understanding and teaching in higher education. SCRE

Fellowship Lecture.

Felder, R.M. and Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering

Education, 94(1): 57-72.

Gieve, S. and Clark, R. (2005). The Chinese approach to learning: Cultural trait or situated response?

the case of a self-directed learning programme. Elsevier Ltd. System 33, pp. 261–276.

Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher

Education, 19: 307-322.

Groves, M. (2005). Problem-based learning and learning approach: Is there a relationship? Advances in

Health Sciences Education, 10: 315-326.

Jarvis, J., and Woodrow, D. (2001). Learning preferences in relation to subjects of study of students in

higher education. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University Of

Leeds, 13-15 September 2001, And At ELSIN, Glamorgan, July 2001.

Jones, A.Y. (1992). The study approach adopted by year 2 physiotherapy students at the Hong Kong

Polytechnic. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 13: 13-22.

Marton F. and Säljö R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I – Outcome and Process’ British

Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 4-11.

Richardson, John T.E. (1994). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: A

literature survey. Higher Education, 27: 449-468.

Snelgrove, S. and Slater, J. (2003). Approaches to learning: psychometric testing of a study process

questionnaire. Journal of Advance Nursing, 43(5): 496-505.

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., and Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations Between Teachers‘ Approaches To

Teaching And Students‘ Approaches To Learning. Higher Education, 37: 57-70.

Wishart, J. (2005). A comparison of preferred learning styles, approaches, and methods between

Information Science and Computing Science undergraduates. Italics E-Journal, 4(2).

Zeegers, P. (1999). Student learning in science: a longitudinal study using the Biggs SPQ. HERDSA

Annual International Conference, Melbourne.

Zeegers, P. (2002). A Revision of the Biggs' Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ). Higher Education

Research and Development, 21(1): 73-92.

Zikmund, W.G. (2000). Business Research Methods, 6th Ed. South-Western Thomson Learning, USA.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-31