EFFECTIVENESS OF VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS IN PROMOTING EXACT SELECTION OF CONTINUITY CORRECTION
Keywords:
Visualization, Normal approximation, Continuity correction, Paired t-testAbstract
The Square + Line method was formulated to enhance the understanding of students in cases
involving Normal Approximation to either Binomial Distribution or Poisson Distribution. In
these topics, usage of continuity correction factor is essential, specifically when we apply
continuous function to approximate a discrete one. The simple steps of modifying (adding or
subtracting 0.5) the discrete x-value are made complicated by the various interval situations.
Through this approach, students can visualize the correct conversion for all the nine
transformation cases. While it is possible that this method does not benefit quick learners, it
nevertheless helps students who have difficulty with continuity knowledge retention. To measure
the effectiveness of this method, students who took diploma program in computer science were
given pre- and post-assessment before and after the learning session. The comparatively much
higher post-test score indicates a significant improvement.
References
Boaler, J., Chen, L., Williams, C., & Cordero, M. (2016). Seeing as Understanding: The
Importance of Visual Mathematics for our Brain and Learning. Journal of Applied &
Computational Mathematics, 5(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9679.1000325
Caligaris, M., Rodríguez, G., & Laugero, L. (2015). Learning Styles and Visualization in
Numerical Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3696–3701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1101
Kashefi, H., Alias, N. A., Kahar, M. F., Buhari, O., & Mirzaei, F. (2015). Visualisation in
mathematics problem solving meta-analysis research. E-Proceeding of the International
Conference on Social Research, ICSSR 2015, 2015(June 2015), 576–585.
Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary School
Students’ Difficulties in Mathematical Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 116(2012), 3169–3174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728
Rivera, F. D., Steinbring, H., & Arcavi, A. (2014). Visualization as an epistemological
learning tool: An introduction. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education,
(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0552-0
Rosken, B., & Rolka, K. (2006). A picture is worth a 1000 words – The role of visualisation in
mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group
for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4(1989), 457–464.
Stefanescu, C., Berger, V., & Hershberger, S. (2005). Yates’s continuity correction.
Encyclopaedia of Statistics …, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a10062
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problemsolving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Academia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.