COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NONLINEAR ROOT FINDING USING IMPROVISED SECANT METHODS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v8i1.19595Keywords:
Nonlinear Equations, Numerical Analysis, Root Finding, Secant MethodAbstract
The nonlinear transcendental or algebraic equation problem is one of the important research areas in numerical analysis, and the iterative methods are playing an important role to find approximate solutions. The Secant method is one of the best iterative methods since it only requires a single evaluation of function. However, the Secant method has low convergence order, thus many improvised Secant methods have been developed by other researchers. Even though improvise secant method has been developed vastly, comparative study of these methods is relatively scarce, and the novelty of this paper is to assess critical numerical performances of the methods. Therefore, in this study, two algorithms based on the Secant method which are the exponential method, and three-point Secant method were used to compare with the Secant method to evaluate the roots for nonlinear equations. The three methods were tested using different initial values in various transcendental functions such as polynomial, exponential, logarithm, trigonometric and some combinations of linear, exponential, polynomial, and trigonometric functions to determine the best method among three methods and to determine the behavior of these method. All the computation results were developed using Graphical User Interface (GUI) in MATLAB environment to get the results and as the visual indicator representations. The obtained results show that the threepoint Secant method has the least number of iterations than the Secant method and exponential method in six numerical results. Conclusively, the three-point Secant method is the best iterative method since the method converged to the roots faster than other two.
References
Aboamemah, A. H., Gorgey, A., Razali, N., & Ibrahim, M. A. H. (2021). Secant Method Superiority Over Newton’s Method in Solving Scalar Nonlinear Equations. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.774
Azure, I., Aloliga, G., & Doabil, L. (2019). Comparative Study of Numerical Methods for Solving Non-linear Equations Using Manual Computation. Mathematics Letters, 5(4), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ml.20190504.11
Badr, E., Almotairi, S., & Ghamry, A. El. (2021). A comparative study among new hybrid root finding algorithms and traditional methods. Mathematics, 9(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111306
Ebelechukwu, C. O., Johnson, B. O., Michael, A. I., & Fidelis, A. T. (2018). Comparison of Some Iterative Methods of Solving Nonlinear Equations. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 4(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20180402.11
Ehiwario, J. C., & Aghamie, S. O. (2014). Comparative Study of Bisection, Newton Raphson and Secant Methods of Root-Finding Problems. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 04(04), 1–7. http://www.iosrjen.org
Gemechu, T. (2016). Root Finding With Some Engineering Applications. IJISET-International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 3(6), 80-85. http://www.ijiset.com
Hui, Z., De-Sheng, L., & Yu-Zhong, L. (2009). A new method of secant-like for nonlinear equations. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14(7), 2923–2927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.11.002
Intep, S. (2018). A review of bracketing methods for finding zeros of nonlinear functions. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 12(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2018.811
Moheuddin, M. M., Uddin, M. J., & Kowsher, M. (2019). A New Study To Find Out The Best Computational Method For Solving The Nonlinear Equation. Applied Mathematics and Sciences An International Journal (MathSJ), 6(3), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.5121/mathsj.2019.6302
Özyapici, A., Sensoy, Z. B., & Karanfiller, T. (2016). Effective Root-Finding Methods for Nonlinear Equations Based on Multiplicative Calculi. Journal of Mathematics, 2016, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8174610
Suhadolnik, A. (2012). Combined bracketing methods for solving nonlinear equations. Applied Mathematics Letters, 25(11), 1755–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2012.02.006
Tasiu, A. R., Abbas, A., Alhassan, M. N., & Umar, A. N. (2020). Comparative Study on some Methods of Handling Nonlinear Equations. In Anale. Seria Informatică.
Thota, S. (2019). A new root-finding algorithm using exponential series. Ural Mathematical Journal, 5(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.15826/umj.2019.1.008
Thota, S., & Srivastav, V. (2014). Interpolation based Hybrid Algorithm for Computing Real Root of Non-Linear Transcendental Functions. 2(11), 729–735.
Thukral, R. (2018). A New Secant-type Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations. American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 8(2), 32–36.
Thukral, R. (2020). New Three-Point Secant-Type Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations. American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 10(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajcam.20201001.03
Tiruneh, A. T., Debessai, T. Y., Bwembya, G. C., & Nkambule, S. J. (2019). A modified three-point Secant method with improved rate and characteristics of convergence. International Journal of Advances in Mathematics, 2019(4), 69–83.
Tiruneh, A. T., Ndlela, W. N., & Nkambule, S. J. (2013). A Two-Point Newton Method Suitable for Nonconvergent Cases and with Super-Quadratic Convergence. Advances in Numerical Analysis, 2013, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/687382
Tu, J., Yeoh, G.-H., & Liu, C. (2013). CFD Solution Analysis: Essentials. In Computational Fluid Dynamics (pp. 211–253). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-
-08-101127-0.00006-4
Wang, X., Kou, J., & Gu, C. (2010). A new modified secant-like method for solving nonlinear equations. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 60(6), 1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.045
Yasir Abdul-Hassan, N. (2016). New Predictor-Corrector Iterative Methods with Twelfth-Order Convergence for Solving Nonlinear Equations. American Journal of Applied Mathematics, 4(4), 175. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajam.20160404.12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Nabilah Rosli, Nor Azni Shahari, Farah Atikah Mohamad Azraei, Siti Najwa Izaham

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




