IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING REFUSAL COVID-19 VACCINE USING FAHP

Authors

  • Norpah Mahat College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Branch, Malaysia
  • Nur Izyan Nabilah College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Branch, Malaysia
  • Izleen Ibrahim College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Branch, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v8i2.21175

Keywords:

COVID-19 Vaccine, Fuzzy Analytics Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Refusal factors, SPSS

Abstract

The pandemic Coronavirus (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide, initially emerging in China. It had spread to more than 180 nations and infected more than 18.4 million people just over six months as recorded in August 2020. Thus, all countries were fighting to get rid of this virus and to find a vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine is currently being offered to people who qualify, but many Malaysians chose not to sign up to receive the immunization. The initial booster dose of vaccine was only administered to half of the nation's total population. Studying the motivational elements and health beliefs that influence vaccination decisions is necessary. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify the factors that influence the refusal of the Covid-19 vaccine. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) will be used to assess the correlation analysis of the variables impacting COVID-19 vaccine rejection. As part of the investigation, the Fuzzy Analytics Hierarchy Process (FAHP) will be used to investigate associated factors. Considered were seven variables that affect vaccine refusal. The finding showed the perception of vaccine safety, and its effectiveness factor is the highest correlation that influences the refusal of the vaccine. It is followed by social factors, the rumours spread by the media, education level, previous experience, knowledge, and public health policies. Furthermore, the result from the FAHP method shows that previous experience is the top-rank factor influencing the refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine since it has a high weight value. The second rank is knowledge, followed by education, public health policies, social, perception of vaccines, and the rumour spread by media. This research contributes to the understanding of the factors influencing Covid-19 vaccine refusal in Malaysia and provides possible targeted vaccination campaigns that are appropriate and effective towards increasing population immunity.

References

Arcadio, A. C. & Leidy, Y.G. (2021). Hesitation and Refusal Factors in Individuals’ Decision-Making Processes Regarding a Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination. Frontier in Public Health, 9, 1-14.

Aziz, N., Othman, J., Lugova, H., & Suleiman, A. (2020). Malaysia's approach in handling COVID-19 onslaught: Report on the Movement Control Order (MCO) and targeted screening to reduce community infection rate and impact on public health and economy. Journal Of Infection and Public Health, 13(12), 1823-1829.

Che Mat, N. F., Edinur, H. A., Abdul Razab, M. K., & Safuan, S. (2020). A single mass gathering resulted in massive transmission of COVID-19 infections in Malaysia with further international spread. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(3).

Emad, M., Mohamud, M., Muhannad, A., Abdulaziz, A., Abdulmohsen, K.A. & Omar, F.A. (2021). Trends in the Usage of Statistical Software and Their Associated Study Designs in Health Sciences Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus, 13(1).

Idris, N.A.M, Mohtar, S.K., Ali, Z.M. & Hamid, K.A. (2022). A Dynamic Sir Model for The Spread of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Computing, 7(2), 1108-1119.

Jafar, A., Dambul, R., Dollah, R., Sakke, N., Mapa, M. T., & Joko, E. P. (2022). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia: Exploring factors and identifying highly vulnerable groups. PloS one, 17(7), e0270868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270868

Johns H.M. (2022). COVID-19 vaccine: What you need to know. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and diseases/coronavirus/covid19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

Khashei, S. A., Keshavarz, A., & Sharifan, H. (2020). Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100328.

KkmNow (2023). COVID-19 Vaccination. Department of Statistics Malaysia, Ministry of Health Malaysia. https://data.moh.gov.my/covid-vaccination

Loh, H., Yuen, K., Wang, X., Surucu-Balci, E., Balci, G., & Zhou, Q. (2020). Airport selection criteria of low-cost carriers: A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Journal Of Air Transport Management, 83, 101759.

Mahat, N. & Zulkofli, N.F. (2020). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Solve the Child Abuse Problem. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation (JCRIIN), 5(4), 38-47.

Mohamad, N., Noraini, N., Izleen, I., Siti Sarah, R. & Norpah, M. (2021). Covid-19: How Malaysia Faced it First Series. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.

Othman, M., Abdul Rahman, N., Ismail, A., & Saharuddin, A. (2020). Factors contributing to the imbalances of cargo flows in Malaysia large-scale minor ports using a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 113-126.

Pal, R., Sekh, A., Kar, S., & Prasad, D. (2020). Neural Network Based Country Wise Risk Prediction of COVID-19. Applied Sciences, 10 (18), 6448.

Rahman, A. & Muktadir, M.D. (2021). SPSS: An Imperative Quatitative Data Analysis Tool for Social Science Research. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, V(X), 300-302.

Rajkumar, R. (2020). Ayurveda and COVID-19: Where psychoneuroimmunology and the meaning response meet. Brain, Behavior, And Immunity, 87, 8-9.

World Health Organization (WHO), 2022. https://www.who.int/healthtopics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING REFUSAL COVID-19 VACCINE USING FAHP. (2023). Malaysian Journal of Computing, 8(2), 1548-1559. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v8i2.21175