COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL ACQUISITION USING WONDERSHARE DR. FONE, MOBILEDIT FORENSIC, AND FONEPAW ON ANDROID PHONES

Authors

  • Nuraimi Farhana Salimi Centre for Information Security Research, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Malaysia
  • Nor Bakiah Abd Warif Faculty of Computing, College of Computing and Applied Sciences,Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nor-Syahidatul N Ismail

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v7i2.16968

Keywords:

Android Forensic, Android Phones, Data Extraction, Logical Acquisition, Mobile Forensic

Abstract

The increasing number of mobile phone usage in storing confidential information, such as mobile online transactions has led to the growing number of research in mobile forensic. There are lot of crimes may happen through mobile phones, such as smishing, bluejacking, and malware attacks. Mobile forensic is a way of collecting any digital evidence on the mobile phone. Logical acquisition is one of the methods for mobile forensic. The methodology for logical acquisition consists of identification, isolation, acquisition, analysis, and documentation. This research aims to study, perform and analyze logical acquisition using Wondershare Dr. Fone for Android, MOBILedit Forensic, and FonePaw for Android in Android-based phones which are Oppo F9 and Samsung S7 Edge. The analysis is based on percentage of capability and time taken for each tested mobile forensic tool on the two selected Android phones. The results show that FonePaw for Android gets the highest average capability (97%) with the shortest time while MOBILedit Forensic obtains the lowest average capability (74%) with the longest time taken. This research may help the forensic investigators team to determine the suitability of mobile forensic tools with Android phones based on the Android features and type of files

References

Abdulhamid, S., Waziri, V., Idris, I., Gbolahan, A., & Alhassan, J. (2018). A forensic evidence recovery from mobile device applications. International Journal of Digital Enterprise Technology, 1, 79.

Alatawi, H., Alenazi, K., Alshehri, S., Alshamakhi, S., Mustafa, M., & Aljaedi, A. (2020). Mobile forensics: A review. 2020 International Conference on Computing and Information Technology, ICCIT 2020, (pp. 1-6).

Alghafli, K., Jones, A., & Martin, T. (2012). Forensics data acquisition methods for mobile phones. 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2012, (pp. 265-269).

Al-Sabaawi, A., & Foo, E. (2019). A comparison study of android mobile forensic for retrieving files system. International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), 13, 148.

Dogan, S., & Akbal, E. (2017). Analysis of mobile phones in digital forensics. 40th Internation Convention on Information and Communincation Technology, Electronics and Microeletronics, MIPRO 2017, (pp. 1241-1244).

Joshi, J., & Parekkh, C. (2016). Android smartphone vulnerailities: A survey. 2016 International Conference on Advance in Computing, Communication and Automation, ICACCA, (pp. 1-5).

Khan, A., & Hussain Mansuri, Z. (2018). Comparative study of various digital forensics logical acquisition tools for android smartphones internal memory: A case study of Samsung Galaxy S5 and S6. Journal of Advances Research in Computer Science, 1(1), 357-369.

Lohiya, R., John, P., & Shah, P. (2015). Survey on mobile forensics. International Journal of Computer Applications, 118(16), 6-11.

Lwin, H., Aung, W., & Lin, K. (2020). Comparative analysis of android mobile forensics tools. 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications, ICCA 2020, (pp. 1-6).

Md. Salleh, R., Mohd., M., & Baharin Khalid, K. (2014). Validation of digital forensics tools for android tablet. Journal of Information Assurance and Security, 9, 19-26.

Meshram, P., & Thool, R. (2014). A survey paper on vulnerabilities in android OS and security of android devices. 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking, (pp. 174-178).

Raji, M., Wimmer, H., & Haddad, R. (2018). Analyzing data from android smartphone while comparing between two forensic tools. IEEE Southeastcon 2018, (pp. 1-6).

Riadi, I., Sunardi, S., & Sahiruddin, S. (2019). Analisis forensik recovery pada smartphone android menggunakan metode National Institude of Justice (NIJ). Jurnal Rekayasa Teknologi Informasi (JURTI), 3(1), 87.

Riadi, I., Sunardi, S., & Sahiruddin, S. (2020). Perbandingan tool forensic data recovery berbasis android menggunakan metode NIST. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(1), 197-204.

Sathe, S., & Dongre, N. (2018). Data acquisition techniques in mobile forensics. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Inventive System and Control, ICISC 2018, (pp. 280-286).

Tajuddin, T., & Manaf, A. (2015). Forensic investigation and analysis on digital evidence discovery through physical acquisition on smartphone. 2015 Worl Congress on Internet Security, WorldCIS 2015, (pp. 132-138).

Tayeb, H., & State, S. (2019). Android mobile device forensics: A review. 7th Internation Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security, ISDFS 2019, (pp. 1-7).

Zinge, P., & Chatterjee, M. (2018). Comprehensive study of digital forensics branches and tools. The International Journal of Forensic Computer Science, 13(1), 22-28.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

Salimi, N. F., Abd Warif, N. B., & N Ismail, N.-S. (2022). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL ACQUISITION USING WONDERSHARE DR. FONE, MOBILEDIT FORENSIC, AND FONEPAW ON ANDROID PHONES. Malaysian Journal of Computing, 7(2), 1162–1177. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v7i2.16968