CONTENT VALIDITY OF BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING (BIM) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR FRAMEWORK FORMATION FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v11i1.1084Keywords:
Building Information Modelling (BIM), Content Validity, Assessment CriteriaAbstract
Assessment of Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation for local government authorities is defined as a process of managerial evaluation tools that measures the organisation's assessment gap. For assessing the current quality, competence, and repeatability of BIM implementation, assessment criteria are therefore crucial. The construction industry in the country is predominantly reliant on traditional methods, hindering development and global competitiveness. Despite various initiatives to promote BIM, its adoption among construction professionals in Malaysia remains limited. To address this, the research aims to establish BIM assessment criteria tailored for local governance authorities, thereby facilitating smoother BIM implementation. The study employs literature review and questionnaire survey methods to assess the content validity of BIM assessment criteria. The data was analysed descriptively in Microsoft Excel using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) formula. A set of questionnaires has been distributed to six (6) experts in BIM. The literature review proposes 51 items across seven main categories for inclusion in the BIM assessment criteria. The CVR scores indicate that 29 out of the 51 items are considered highly critical by content experts. Additionally, item Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Modified Kappa Coefficient findings reveal that 41 items demonstrate appropriateness and excellence. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights for the development of a BIM assessment criteria framework specifically tailored for local governance authorities. The finding of this study is beneficial for further study in developing the BIM assessment criteria framework for local governance authority.
References
Akmal, N., Nasir, M., Singh, P., Narayanan, G., Hani, A., Habali, M., & Rasid, S. (2022). Development of mathematical thinking test: content validity process. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 18–29. https://ejssh.uitm.edu.my
Al-Ashmori, Y. Y., Othman, I., Rahmawati, Y., Amran, Y. H. M., Sabah, S. H. A., Rafindadi, A. D. u., & Mikić, M. (2020). BIM benefits and its influence on the BIM implementation in Malaysia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(4), 1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.002
Alias, E. S., Mukhtar, M., & Jenal, R. (2019). Instrument development for measuring the acceptance of UC & C: A content validity study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100422
Alreshidi, E., Mourshed, M., & Rezgui, Y. (2018). Requirements for cloud-based BIM governance solutions to facilitate team collaboration in construction projects. Requirements Engineering, 23(1), 1-31 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0254-6
Alshawi, M. (2007). Rethinking IT in Construction and Engineering.
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB). (2019). A guide to enabling BIM on building projects. http://www.mbie.govt.nz/about/whats-happening/news/document-image-library/nz-bim-handbook.pdf
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB). (2020). Construction industry transformation program 2016 - 2020. CITP report 8.0 Q4 2020.
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB). (2017). 14.BIM-Report-2016. Malaysia Building Information Modelling Report 2016, CIDB Technical Report Publication No 1217.
Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB). (2021). Malaysia Building Information Modelling (BIM) Report 2021.
Hadzaman, N. A. H., Takim, R., Nawawi, A. H., & Mohamad Yusuwan, N. (2018). Content validity of governing in Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation assessment instrument. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 140(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012105
Haron, N. A., Soh, R. P. Z. A. R., & Harun, A. (2017). Implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: A Review. Article in Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 25 (3): 661 - 674. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/
Harun, A., Nasrun, M., Nawi, M., & Haron, N. A. (2017). Existing practices of Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in the public sector. http://excelingtech.co.uk/
Harun, A., Nasrun, M., Nawi, M., & Haron, N. A. (2018). The potential use of BIM through an electronic submission: A preliminary study. MRCJ Special Issue, Vol.3(No. 1), 82-96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333379799
Hashim, N., Samsuri, A. S., & Idris, N. H. (2021). Assessing organisations’ readiness for technological changes in construction industry. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(1), 130–139.
https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.01.013
Ibiyemi, A., Mohd Adnan, Y., Daud, M. N., Olanrele, S., & Jogunola, A. (2019). A content validity study of the test of valuers’ support for capturing sustainability in the valuation process in Nigeria. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 25(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2019.1703700
Khalfan, M. M. A. (2001). BEACON MODEL SOFTWARE.
Khalfan, M. M., Anumba, C. J., Siemieniuch, C. E., & Sinclair, M. A. (2001). Readiness assessment of the construction supply chain for concurrent engineering. In European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management Vol.7 (2001) 141 - 153 PII: S 0 9 6 9 - 7 0 1 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 2 3 -
Kipli, M., & Khairani, A. Z. (2020). Content validity index: An application of validating CIPP instruments for programme evaluation. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj313
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Musarat, M. A., Alaloul, W. S., Cher, L. S., Qureshi, A. H., Alawag, A. M., & Baarimah, A. O. (2023). Applications of Building Information Modelling in the operation and maintenance phase of construction projects: A framework for the Malaysian construction industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6), 2-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065044
Obilor, E. I., & Miwari, G. U. (2022). Content validity in educational assessment. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 10(2), 57–69. www.seahipaj.org
Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on research methods is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity ? Appraisal and Recommendations.2007, 30, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Rezgui, Y., Beach, T., & Rana, O. (2013). A governance approach for BIM management across lifecycle and supply chains using mixed-modes of information delivery. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.760480
Ruikar, K., Anumba, C. J., & Carrillo, P. M. (2006). VERDICT-An e-readiness assessment application for construction companies. Automation in Construction, 15(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.009
Sebastian, R., & Van Berlo, L. (2010). Tool for benchmarking BIM performance of design, engineering and construction firms in the Netherlands. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol 6, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS3
Sidek, S. F. (2022). The design and validation of a tool to measure content validity of a computational thinking game-based learning module for tertiary educational students. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj01
Siebelink, S., Voordijk, J. T., & Adriaanse, A. (2018). Developing and testing a tool to evaluate BIM maturity: sectoral analysis in the Dutch construction industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 2018, 144(8), 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943
Sinoh, S. S., Ibrahim, Z., Othman, F., & Muhammad, N. L. N. (2020). Review of BIM literature and government initiatives to promote BIM in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 943(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/943/1/012057
Succar, B. (2009a). The Five Components of BIM Performance Measurement. http://bit.ly/AmazonBooks_BIM
Succar, B. (2009b). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
The Computer Integrated Construction (CIC) Research Program. (2012). BIM Planning Guide for Facility Owners Version 1.02 July 2012. http://bim.psu.edu
Tong, N., & Phung, Q. (2021). Developing an organisational readiness framework for bim implementation in large design companies. International Journal Of Sustainable Construction Engineering And Technology, 12(3), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.03.006
Van Berlo, L., Dijkmans, T., Hendriks, H., Consultant, Q., & Spekkink, D. (2010). BIM quickscan: benchmark of BIM performance in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the CIB W78 2012: 29th International Conference –Beirut, Lebanon, 17-19 October
Waqar, A., Qureshi, A. H., & Alaloul, W. S. (2023). Barriers to building information modelling (BIM) deployment in small construction projects: Malaysian construction industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 2-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032477
Wu, P., Jin, R., Xu, Y., Lin, F., Dong, Y., & Pan, Z. (2021). The analysis of barriers to BIM implementation for industrialised building construction: A China study. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.14105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access is by licensing the content with a Creative Commons (CC) license.
Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment by MySE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://myse.my.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://creativecommons.org/choose/#metadata.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
