BIOPHILIC ARCHITECTURE AND SPATIAL PERCEPTION: THE CASE OF GEOFFREY BAWA’S KEY WORKS AND THE PAM CENTRE, A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Ahmad Zharif Ahmad Zahir; Farah Shahira  Azmi

doi:10.24191/myse.v11i2.1616

Authors

Ahmad Zharif Ahmad Zahir College of Built Environment, MARA University of Technology, UiTM Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor
Farah Shahira Azmi Studies of Architecture, College of Built Environment, MARA University of Technology UiTM Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v11i2.1616

Keywords:

Biophilic Architecture, Geoffrey Bawa, PAM Centre, Environmental Design, Architectural Psychology

Abstract

The three main design parameters noted in the applications of biophilic architecture, Nature in the Space, Natural Analogues, and Nature of the Space are key design principles that focus on the integral relationship between the natural and the built environment. This study explores the application of these primary Biophilic design principles in Geoffrey Bawa’s architecture focusing on the indispensable aspects of both; architectural design (the craft) and user experience (the psychological and the social well-being), measured through aspect of spatial perception. As this study aims to benefit the discourse of Malaysian Architecture, it will bring forth the corollaries between Geoffrey Bawa’s architecture and the newly retrofitted Centre of Malaysian Institute of Architects (PAM). Geoffrey Bawa is noted as the internationally recognised leading architect practicing Biophilic design. In this research there are three key questions that have been addressed; (1) What roles do these three primary Biophilic design principles play in architecture? (2) How do they then engender a concrete sense of a cohesive and natural-feeling environment to the general user in the PAM Centre? (3) How effective is the Biophilic design applied in the PAM Centre in nurturing close-knit connection with Nature for its users, compared to other architecture of equivalent typology, namely public building. This study is driven by qualitative methodologies, covering document analysis, precedent study, and a comprehensive case study of the PAM Centre. This case study involves a comparative analysis of the Biophilic design principles specifically drawn from architectures of Geoffrey Bawa and their applications in the PAM Centre. The findings reveal a deep understanding of three (3) main pillars of the Biophilic design and their effective integration as already manifested by Geoffrey Bawa, which enhances the natural ambiance and connectivity to nature within building and built environment. In conclusion, the research demonstrates Bawa’s Biophilic design principles which is evident in the architecture of PAM Centre successfully creating environments that are both natural and supportive of human well-being.

References

Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as Evolutionary Adaptation: An Onto- and Phylogenetic Framework or Biophilic Design. Frontiers of Psychology, 12(1). Retrieved April 26, 2024, from doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709

Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Roos, P. (2017). Biophilic Design Applications: Putting Theory and Patterns into Built Environment Practice, 2017, Retrieved April 26, 2024, from doi.org/10.18502/keg. v2i2.596

Geoffrey Bawa | PPT. (2014). SlideShare. Retrieved July 1, 2024, from slideshare.net/slideshow/geoffrey-bawa/39886357

Griffin, C. (2004). An Introduction to Biophilia and The Built Environment. RMI Solutions, 20(1), pp. 7–11, Retrieved April 27, 2024, from archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/17468

Hettiarachchi, R., & Moore, C. (2024). Tropical modern design strategies used by Geoffrey Bawa. Sri Lanka: Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology

Hu, W. (2017, June). A Simple Analysis on The Combination of Modernism and Regional Culture in The Construction by Geoffrey Bawa. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017), pp. 496–499, Retrieved April 27, 2024, from doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.121

Ibrahim, I., Khairuddin, R., Abdullah, A., & Wahid, I. M. (2021). Analysis of biophilic design in communal space of an office building. Case study: Pertubuhan Arkitek Malaysia (PAM) centre, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2347(1) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from doi.org/10.1063/5.0052824

Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. F. (N.D.). The Practice of Biophilic Design. Minnesota: UMN Press

Kiang, T. B., & Robson, D. (2006). Bioclimatic Skyscraper – Learning from Bawa, PLEA-2006 – The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 6-8 September, Retrieved April 28, 2024, from api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:111334984

Mollazadeh, M., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Application of Virtual Environments for Biophilic Design: A Critical Review. Buildings, Retrieved April 28, 2024, from doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040148

Owen, C. (2008). Architecture Between the Culture-Nature Dualism: A Case Study of Geoffrey Bawa’s Kandalama Hotel. International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet IJAR, 2(1), pp. 40-56 Retrieved April 29, 2024, from archnet.org/

Robson, David (2001). “Genius of the Place: The Buildings and Landscapes of Geoffrey Bawa.” In Modernity and Community: Architecture in the Islamic World, edited by Philippa Baker, pp.17-48. London: Thames & Hudson.

Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L., & Kallianpurkar. (2014). Biophilic Design Patterns Emerging Nature-Based Parameters for Health and Well-Being in The Built Environment. International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet IJAR, 8(2), pp. 62-75 Retrieved April 29, 2024, from archnet.org/

Sperlich, B. W., Hoffmann, S., Salditt, A., Bipp, T., & Froboese, I. (2019). Moving To An “Active” Biophilic Design Office Workplace: A Pilot Study About the Effects on Sitting Time and Sitting Habits of Office-Based Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(9), Retrieved April 30, 2024, from doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091559

Vimukthi, K.K. M., & Rajapaksha, U. (2015). Spatio-Visual Patterns in Respect to Visual Experience: An Exploration of Architecture of Geoffrey Bawa, 8th International Conference of Faculty of Architecture Research Unit (FARU) - 2015, pp. 357-368, Retrieved April 30, 2024, from dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/12922

Zhong, W., Schroder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2021). Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-Being, And Sustainability: A Critical Review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), pp. 114-141, Retrieved April 30, 2024, from doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Retrieved May 1, 2024, from archive.org/details/edward-o.-wilson-biophilia/page/61/

Browning, W., Ryan, C.O., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment.

Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Giudice, N. A. (2013). Representing 3D space in working memory: Spatial images from vision, hearing, touch, and language. In S. Lacey & R. Lawson (Eds.), Multisensory imagery (pp. 131–155). Springer Science + Business Media., 16(9), Retrieved May 1, 2024, from doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_8

TMD Studi Ltd. (2017). Spatial Perception and Architecture, Medium. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from medium.com/studiotmd/spatial-perception-and-architecture-4f8ab99eeb41

Wolbers T, Hegarty M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar, 14(3), pp. 138-46. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001

Söderlund, J., Newman, P. (2022). How the biophilic design social movement informs planning, policy and professional practice. Sustain Earth 5(4). Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-022-00051-2