FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE USER SATISFACTION WITH CAMPUS SPACES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DESIGN-BASED AND NON-DESIGN BASED CLASSROOM

Hasnan  Hashim; Muhammad Ruzaini  Ramlan; Nurhidayah  Samsul Rijal; An Nisha Nur Welliana  Abd Rased

doi:10.24191/myse.v12i2.7075

Authors

Hasnan Hashim Program of Building Surveying, Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610 Perak, Malaysia1
Muhammad Ruzaini Ramlan Program of Building Surveying, Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610 Perak, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3382-1183
Nurhidayah Samsul Rijal Program of Building Surveying, Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology, College of Built Environment, University Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610 Perak, Malaysia
An Nisha Nur Welliana Abd Rased Program of Building Surveying, Department of Built Environment Studies & Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610 Perak, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-0558

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v12i2.7075

Keywords:

Higher Learning Institution, Space management, Space requirement, User satisfaction, Apace management practise

Abstract

Space management is an effective management of space utilisation aimed at reducing the cost and wastage of spaces. The aim of this study is to improve the space management practices at College of Built Environment (CBE), UiTM, Shah Alam. The finding is hoped to benefit the Space Management Unit, Facilities Management Office who is in charge of the space management for CBE. In order to achieve the research aim, three objectives have been set out. The objectives were to investigate the current practices of space management at CBE’s Building, to identify the space requirement at CBE’s faculty and to identify the level of user satisfaction on space management at CBE’s Building. The methodology adopted was qualitative and quantitative method using literature review, semi-structured interview and questionnaire survey. SPSS version 20 was used to analyse the data. The results revealed that the practices of space management were traditional and not centralise, the types of space required by the faculty includes classroom, computer laboratory, TEC room, workshop (timber laboratory and concrete laboratory), studio, lecture hall and external study area.

References

Aschner, G.S., (1999). Sources of the continued influence effect:Meeting customers’ requirements and what can be expected. The TQM Magazine, 11(6), 450 - 455.

Beyrouthy, C. et al., (2007). Sources of the continued influence effect: The teaching space allocation problem with splitting. Lecture. Notesin Computer Science, 3867, 228.

Burke, E.K., Cowling, P. & Landa Silva, J.D., (2001). Sources of the continued influence effect:Three methods to automate the space allocation process in UK universities.

Coles, C. (2002). Variability of student ratings of accounting teaching: Evidence from a Scottish business school. International Journal of Management Education, 2(2), 9–30.

Hill, F. M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: The role of the student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(3), 10–21.

Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251–67.

Jones, T., & Sasser, W. E., Jr. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review, 73(6), 88–99.

Kotler, P., & Clarke, R. N. (1987). Sources of the continued influence effect: Marketing for health care organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Malik, M.I., and Usman, A. (2011). Sources of the continued influence effect: Role Overload, job Satisfaction and their effect on Layoff Survivor’s Job Retention and Productivity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(11): 427-44440.

Sapri, M., Kaka, A., & Finch, E. (2009). Factors that influence students' level of satisfaction with regards to higher educational facilities services. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, 4, 34–51.

Sasser, W. E., Olsen, R. P., & Wyckoff, D. D. (1978). Management of service operations. Allyn and Bacon.

Sohail, M. S., & Shaikh, N. M. (2004). Quest for excellence in business education: A study of student impressions of service quality. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18(1), 58–65.

Zahedi, F. (1997). Reliability metric for information systems based on customer requirements. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 14(8), 791–813.

University of Dayton, (2011). Outcome evaluation in the Space Management Guidelines, University of Dayton Press.

UK Higher Education Space Management Project. (2006). Space management project: Summary. Outcome evaluation in the UK Higher Education Space Management Group (SMG).

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE USER SATISFACTION WITH CAMPUS SPACES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DESIGN-BASED AND NON-DESIGN BASED CLASSROOM

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License