EFFECT OF DIFFERENT MEMBRANE USE IN MICRO-BACTERICAL VOLTAIC CELL FOR ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATION FROM WASTEWATER

Authors

  • Rafidah Selaman Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Cawangan Sabah, Kampus Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88997, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0471-0981
  • Mohd Faizal Achoi Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Cawangan Sabah, Kampus Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88997, Malaysia
  • Mohd Ruzaleh Nurdik Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Cawangan Sabah, Kampus Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88997, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0463-4099
  • Ajis Lepit Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Cawangan Sabah, Kampus Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88997, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-279X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v12i2.7077

Keywords:

Micro-bacterial cell, Wastewater, Membrane, Voltage, Energy

Abstract

The sustainable, green and renewable energy are characteristics of energy source that are highly demanded nowadays. The world energy annual reported that the escalating electricity consumption will surpass energy output. For example, oil, biofuel, hydropower, nuclear and natural gas were projected depleted by 2050. Therefore, another alternative energy source from wastewater and design two columns of reactor was created, using the voltaic cell working principle that is capable to generate voltage. The voltage is one joule of energy per one coulomb unit charge passed. The wastewater contributed to the air pollution and released a bad smell to the surrounding environment. The method employed in this study was the anaerobic digestion (AD) from the fermentation process. Our aim in this study is to vary the type of membrane bridge in micro-bacterial cell, were parafilm, polyvinylidene fluoride-co-polyvinyllimdazole (PVDF-g-PVim) and agar-agar membranes, while the sample used was 100 mL of wastewater as a source for biocatalyst that was fixed with temperature of 35 oC fermentation. As a result, the value of voltage was increased from 0.50 V to 1.25 V measured using voltage meter, corresponding to parafilm membrane, agar-agar membrane and PVDF-g-PVim membrane, respectively. By optimizing the membrane bridge type, the voltage of the micro-bacterial cell was enhanced almost three times compared to a conventional membrane. Our findings suggested that the high voltage can be obtained by using a cheap and eco-friendly membrane, and yet the voltage production from micro-bacterial cell can be improved, thus providing another alternative energy source in the future.

References

Felipe, V., Neyla, B., Enrique, B., Oscar, A. L., & William, H. L. (2018). Electrochemical monitoring and microbial characterization of a domestic wastewater-fed microbial fuel cell inoculated with anaerobic sludge. Revista Colombiana, 22(2), 2248–4000. https://doi.org/10.25100/rc.v22i2.7910.

Forsberg, C. W. (2009). Sustainability by combining nuclear, fossil, and renewable energy sources. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51(1), 92–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.04.002.

Hernández-Flores, G., Andrio, A., Compañ, V., Solorza-Feria, O., & Poggi-Varaldo, H. M. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of organic agarbased membranes for microbial fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 435, 226772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226772.

Holechek, J. L., Geli, H. M. E., Sawalhah, M. N., & Valdez, R. (2022). A global assessment: Can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability, 14(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084792.

Kamyab, B., & Rahmanian, B. (2019). Investigation of the effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of potato leachate in a two-stage mixed-UASB system. Biomass and Bioenergy, 130, 23–27.

Li, J. (2013). An experimental study of microbial fuel cells for electricity generation: Performance characterization and capacity improvement. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 3, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2013.33024.

Li, P., Chen, Y., Xiao, F., Cao, M., Pan, J., Zheng, J., Zhao, K., Li, H.,Zhang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). An enhanced proton conductivity of proton exchange membranes by constructing proton-conducting nanopores using PVP-UiO-66-NH-SO3H nanoparticles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 50, 1020–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.015.

Lim, K. L., Wong, C. Y., Wong, W. Y., Loh, K. S., Selambakkannu, S.,Othman, N. A. F., & Yang, H. (2021). Radiation-grafted anion-exchange membrane for fuel cell and electrolyzer applications: A mini review. Membranes, 11, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060397.

Mondal, T., Jana, A., & Kundu, D. (2017). Aerobic wastewater treatment technologies: A mini review. 135–140.

Naha, A., Debroy, R., Sharma, D., Shah, M. P., & Nath, S. (2023). Microbial fuel cell: A state-of-the-art and revolutionizing technology for efficient energy recovery. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 1, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100050.

Noor, T., et al. (2020). Chapter 14 – Types, sources and management of urban wastes. In an edited volume (pp. 239–263). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820730-7.00014-8.

Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1167990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990.

J. Sheffield. (1998). World Population Growth and the Role of Annual Energy Use per Capita. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 59(1), 55–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00071-1.

Lepit, A., Aini, N. A., Jaafar, N. K., Hashim, N., Ali, A. M. M., Dahlan, K. Z. M., & Yahya, M. Z. A. (2012). Influences of co-polymerization 1-vinylimidazole onto γ-irradiated poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 7(9), 8560–8577.

Sima, M., & Seyed, A. M. (2021). A review of the operating parameters on the microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and electricity generation. Water Science and Technology, 84(6), 1309–1323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75916-7.

Schäpper, D., Alam, M. N. H. Z., Szita, N., Eliasson Lantz, A., & Gernaey, K. V. (2009). Application of microbioreactors in fermentation process development: A review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 395(3), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2955-x

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2016). International energy outlook 2016 (DOE/EIA-0484). https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/

Pu, H., Qin, Y., Wan, D., & Yang, Z. (2009). Proton-conducting polymers via free radical polymerization of diisopropyl-p-vinylbenzyl phosphonate and 1-vinylimidazole. 3000–3004.

Qian, J., et al. (2022). Revealing the mechanisms of polypyrrole (Ppy) enhancing methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS). Water Research, 226, 119291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119291.

Vavra, S., Elamin, K., Evenas, L., & Martinelli, A. (2021). Transport properties and local structure of an imidazole/protic ionic liquid mixture confined in the mesopores of hydrophobic silica. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 125, 2607–2618. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08627.

Zeev, R., & Aharon, A. (2000). Anaerobic-aerobic process for microbial degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(6), 2372–2377. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2372-2377.2000.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Selaman, R., Achoi, M. F. ., Nurdik, M. R., & Lepit, A. . (2025). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT MEMBRANE USE IN MICRO-BACTERICAL VOLTAIC CELL FOR ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATION FROM WASTEWATER. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 12(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v12i2.7077