SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TRANSITION CHALLENGES IN SELECTED ASEAN COUNTRIES: A 4A FRAMEWORK AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Umme Humayara Manni
  • Prof. Datuk. Dr. Kasim Hj. Md. Mansur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v11i1.981

Keywords:

Energy Transition, 4A framework, DEA, ASEAN, Sustainability

Abstract

Energy security—considering depleting fossil fuel sources, growing energy demand, the availability and affordability of renewables, and the environmental effects of energy production and consumption is a significant issue for all governments. The research examines the 2010–2021 ASEAN energy transition hurdles. The 4A framework statistically monitored availability, acceptability, affordability, and application, while the DEA approach assessed renewable energy sustainability. Oil, gas, and coal reserve-production ratios, energy intensity, CO2 emissions, renewable energy, fossil fuel subsidies, and GDP per capita are indicators. The 4A paradigm depicts countries regressing on availability and affordability while maintaining application and acceptability. The DEA technique suggests using renewable energy to enhance productivity and reduce CO2 emissions in developed nations. The suggested DEA technique uses renewable energy consumption, total energy consumption, labor, natural resource rent, and installed renewable capacity as inputs and GDP and CO2 emissions as outputs to prioritize economic or environmental criteria in sustainable development evaluations. All nations except Vietnam have comparable 2010 GDP and CO2 emissions. CO2 consumption increased Vietnam’s GDP and decreased in the Philippines in 2015. The input suggests that policymakers prioritize energy policy assessment and development utilizing the 4A framework and DEA methodology. Policymakers should also examine inventive ways to promote renewable energy and deliver cheap, low-carbon power. ASEAN should also address pricing, energy imports, and energy use’s environmental and climate change implications to hasten the low-carbon energy transition. The research emphasizes economic development but may miss renewable energy’s political and economic effects. Future studies should examine ASEAN renewable energy hurdles and their economic, social, and employment effects.

References

Amin, S. B., Chang, Y., Khan, F. R., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Energy security and sustainable energy policy in Bangladesh: From the lens of 4As framework. Energy Policy, 161, 112719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112719

Amin, S. B., Kabir, F. A., & Khan, F. (2022). Socioeconomic and Institutional Barriers for Accelerating Biogas Generation in Asia. Elsevier eBooks, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819727-1.00042-x

Ang, B. W., Choong, W. L., & Ng, T. S. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064

Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (2007). A quest for energy security in the 21st century: Resources and constraints. Institute of Energy Economics, Japan.

Bohi, D. R., Toman, M. A., & Walls, M. (1996). The economics of energy security. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1808-5

Chachuli, F. S. M., Ludin, N. A., Jedi, M. a. M., & Hamid, N. a. A. (2021). Transition of renewable energy policies in Malaysia: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, 111456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111456

Fan, Y., & Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2015). Achieving Sustainable Energy Security: 2030 Outlook for ASEAN, People Republic of China and India (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2639573). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2639573

Hamed, T. A., & Bressler, L. (2019). Energy security in Israel and Jordan: The role of renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 135, 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.036

Inglesi-Lotz, R. and Dogan, E. (2018) The Role of Renewable versus Non-Renewable Energy to the Level of CO2 Emissions: A Panel Analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa’s Big 10 Electricity Generators. Renewable Energy, 123, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.041

Jamil, N. S., Mohd, T., & Masrom, S. (2020). Determining Significant Factors Affecting Green Building Price Using Multiple Regression Analysis.

Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, Vol.7 (No.2), 65–80. UiTM Press, https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v7i2.10264.

Kanchana, K., & Unesaki, H. (2015). Assessing Energy Security Using Indicator-Based Analysis: The Case of ASEAN Member Countries. Social Sciences, 4(4), 1269–1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041269

Lei, C., Wang, Y., Lai, F., & Feng, F. (2017). An investment analysis for China’s sustainable development based on inverse data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1638–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.129

Liddle, B., & Sadorsky, P. (2017). How much does increasing non-fossil fuels in electricity generation reduce carbon dioxide emissions? Applied Energy, 197, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.025

Le, T.-H. and Park, D. (2021), “What drives energy insecurity across the world? A panel data analysis”, Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 77, p. 102093, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102093.

Malik, S., Qasim, M., Saeed, H., Chang, Y., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2020). Energy security in Pakistan: Perspectives and policy implications from a quantitative analysis. Energy Policy, 144, 111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111552

Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Streimikiene, D., Jusoh, A., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1298–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.030

Martišauskas, L., Augutis, J., & Krikštolaitis, R. (2018). Methodology for energy security assessment considering energy system resilience to disruptions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22, 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.007

Roslee, N. N., Tharim, A. H. A., & Jaffar, N. (2022, August 31). Investigation On the Barriers of Green Building Development in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, Vol.9. No.2 (2022) 37-58. UiTM Press. doi: 10.24191/myse.v9i2.18827

Sahid, E. J. M. (2018). Energy Security in Malaysia: A Quantitative Analysis. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 400. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22770

Sarangi, G. K., Mishra, A., Chang, Y., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019). Indian electricity sector, energy security and sustainability: An empirical assessment. Energy Policy, 135, 110964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110964

Senderov, S., & Vorobev, S. (2018). Ensuring energy security in ASEAN countries: Current trends and major challenges. E3S Web of Conferences, 27, 02002.

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760050081951

Sovacool, B. K., & Mukherjee, I. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. Energy, 36(8), 5343–5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043

Sovacool, B. K., & Saunders, H. (2014). Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security. Energy, 67, 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.039

Sueyoshi, T., Mo, F., & Wang, D. (2022). Sustainable development of countries all over the world and the impact of renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 184, 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.015

Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Yoshino, N. (2019). Energy and Food Security: Linkages through Price Volatility. Energy Policy, 128, 796–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.043

Tongsopit, Sopitsuda, Noah Kittner, Youngho Chang, Apinya Aksornkij, and Weerin Wangjiraniran. 2016. “Energy Security in ASEAN: A Quantitative Approach for Sustainable Energy Policy.” Energy Policy 90 (March): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.019.

Wang, D. (2019). Performance assessment of major global cities by DEA and Malmquist index analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 77, 101365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101365

Wang, C., Nguyen, N., Dang, T., & Wang, J. (2022). Assessing Asian Economies Renewable Energy Consumption Efficiency Using DEA with Undesirable Output. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 43(1), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2022.022941

Yang, L., Sheng, Z., & Azhgaliyeva, D. (2019). Towards energy security in ASEAN: Impact of regional trade, renewables and energy efficiency. ADBI Working Paper 1041, World Scientific. Asian Development Bank Institute.

Vivoda, V. (2010). Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach. Energy Policy, 38(9), 5258–5263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.028

Von Hippel, D., Suzuki, T., Williams, J. H., Savage, T., & Hayes, P. (2011). Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6719–6730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.001

Yao, L., & Chang, Y. (2014). Energy security in China: A quantitative analysis and policy implications. Energy Policy, 67, 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.047

Zhou, Z., Xiao, H., Jin, Q., & Liu, W. (2018). DEA frontier improvement and portfolio rebalancing: An application of China mutual funds on considering sustainability information disclosure. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.010

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Manni, U. H., & Md. Mansur , K. . (2024). SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TRANSITION CHALLENGES IN SELECTED ASEAN COUNTRIES: A 4A FRAMEWORK AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v11i1.981