Peer Review Process

The INSIGHT Journal (IJ) adopts a rigorous double blind peer review process for all submitted manuscripts. Under this model, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept strictly confidential to ensure impartiality, objectivity, and fairness throughout the evaluation process.

All manuscripts are assessed by independent expert reviewers based on scholarly merit, originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and relevance to the journal’s scope. Editorial decisions are made solely on academic quality and integrity, free from any form of bias or conflict of interest.

INSIGHT Journal (IJ) is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and aligns its peer review practices with the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics. The journal adheres to COPE’s Ethical Framework and follows the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers to ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct at every stage of the review process.

Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, declare any competing interests, provide constructive and unbiased feedback, and refrain from using unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript for personal advantage. Editors oversee the process to ensure compliance with ethical standards and to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly record.

For further guidance, please refer to COPE resources:
https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Guidelines
https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers