Effective learning environment towards learning agility: student’s attitude as mediator

Authors

  • Ainunnazlee Mohd Ali Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam
  • Azmi Mat Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam
  • Nur Liana Kori Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam
  • Mohammad Zaim Salleh Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam
  • Norliza Saiful Bahry Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam
  • Nor Sara Nadia Muhamad Yunus Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v12i2.3678

Keywords:

EFFECTIVE LEARNING

Abstract

An effective learning environment, characterized by student-centered teaching methods, access to resources, and a supportive atmosphere, is frequently seen as a catalyst for fostering this agility. The role of students' attitudes, such as motivation, openness to change, and engagement, can significantly impact learning agility among students. This research employs a survey methodology to examine the various elements of a learning environment and their impact on students' agility in learning, focusing on a sample of 323 students from private universities in Selangor. The analysis also explores the extent to which students' attitudes influence this relationship, either enhancing or diminishing the effect of the learning environment on agility. Data collection was conducted via surveys administered to university students, followed by structural equation modeling analysis. The findings indicate that an effective learning environment positively correlates with learning agility, and this relationship is notably enhanced when students demonstrate a positive attitude toward learning. Curiosity, resilience, and a growth mindset are essential elements in optimizing the advantages of an effective learning environment. The study's implications underscore the importance of educators considering student attitudes when creating learning environments intended to cultivate agile, adaptive learners.

References

Mettam, G. R., & Adams, L. B. (1994). How to prepare an electronic version of your article. In B. S. Jones, & R. Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the electronic age (pp. 281-304). E-Publishing Inc.

Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801

Azhar, Z., Jalaludin, D., Ghani, E. K., Ramayah, T., & Nelson, S. P. (2024). Learning agility quotient and work readiness of graduating accounting students: embracing the dynamics of IR4.0. Accounting Education, 33(4), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2023.2211567

Eichinger, R., & Lombardo, M. (2004). Learning Agility as a Prime Indicator of Potential. Human Res, 27(12).

Hargie, O. (2006). The Handbook of Communication Skills (4th ed.). Routledge.

Haring, S., Shankar, J., & Hofkes, M. K. (2013). The Potential of Learning Agility the Relationship between Learning Agility and Success Introduction 3.

Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy implementation space. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z

Ismail, Z., Aziz, C. R., & Chea, C. C. (2024). Preparing Future-ready Learners: 21st Century Skills in an Open and Distance Learning Education in Malaysia. JPTJJ, 25(1), 27–40.

Lee, J., & Song, J. H. (2022). Developing a measurement of employee learning agility. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2021-0018

Marchionini, G., & White, R. (2007). Find What You Need, Understand What You Find. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 23(3), 205–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310701702352

Maria, M., Shahbodin, F., & Pee, N. C. (2018). Malaysian higher education system towards industry 4.0 – Current trends overview. 020081. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055483

Mohd Satar, N. S., Dastane, O., & Morshidi, A. (2021). E-learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Analyzing Key Mediators. International Journal of Management, Accounting, and Economics, 8(8).

Nathan, L. (2019, July 2). Covid-19 — how one pandemic transforms the education system worldwide. The Malaysia Reserve. https://themalaysianreserve.com/2020/07/02/covid-19-how-one-pandemic-transforms-education-system-worldwide/

Rasiah, R., Yun Low, W., & Kamaruddin, N. (2023). Digitalization and Development; Ecosystem for Promoting Industrial Revolution 4.0 Technologies in Malaysia. www.routledge.com/

Reith‐Hall, E., & Montgomery, P. (2023). Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1309

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods For Business Students (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. www.weforum.org

Silalahi, D. E., Hotmadinar Sianipar, H., & Kurnia, I. (2020). Agility of Male and Female Students through Online Learning during Covid-19. www.globalscientificjournal.com

Silva, E. (2009). Measuring Skills for 21st-Century Learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000905

Singh, H. (2019, May 16). Delivering game-changing initiatives for national education. The Malaysian Reserve. https://themalaysianreserve.com/2019/05/16/delivering-game-changing-initiatives-for-national-education/

Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and comparison among equals Effects on academic performance and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.4.532

Tan, J. P.-L., Choo, S. S., Kang, T., & Liem, G. A. D. (2017). Educating for twenty-first-century competencies and future-ready learners: research perspectives from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1405475

Tang, G., Yu, B., Cooke, F. L., & Chen, Y. (2017). High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organizational support and devolved management. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0235

The Research Advisors. (2006). Sample Size Table. https://www.research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm

Vadakalu Elumalai, K., P Sankar, J., R, K., Ann John, J., Menon, N., Salem M Alqahtani, M., & Abdulaziz Abumelha, M. (2020). Factors Affecting the Quality of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Higher Education Students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 731–753. https://doi.org/10.28945/4628

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen a longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.994544

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401990017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Mohd Ali, A., Mat, A., Kori, N. L., Mohd Salleh, M. Z., Saiful Bahry, N., & Muhamad Yunus, N. S. N. (2024). Effective learning environment towards learning agility: student’s attitude as mediator. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 12(2), 3678. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v12i2.3678