Privatization and Efficiency: Once Upon a Time in Libya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v1i1.114Keywords:
Privatization, Libya, Data Envelopment Analysis Technique, Technical efficiencyAbstract
This efficiency assessment of Libyan manufacturing firms is unique as efficiency is assessed on a developing country that undertakes privatization primarily for political and organizational reasons. Moreover, the state of mixed results in the literature with regards to production efficiency between state-owned and private-owned firms motivated the conduct of this study. Despite deliberate implementation of programs to improve efficiency, the situation in Libya was such that firms were able to improve their performance through internal efforts even in a negative environment. This has made the results of this study differ for developed and developing countries. For instance, from 1978-2002, the socialism-oriented economy replaced the capitalism system, transferring private ownership to the state. This has resulted in low levels of labour productivity, and weak structure of production in terms of acquisition of new technology. Moreover, both the United States and United Nation Security Council imposed sanctions on Libya from 1992-2003 which have restricted foreign direct investments. During these periods, the Libyan manufacturing sector suffered from increasing inefficiencies resulting in slowing down of growth of output following decline in labour productivity and financial capital. The objective of this study is to compare the technical efficiency of firms before and after privatization to be able to differentiate between state control and privatized firms, as well. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique was used to compute the efficiency scores of firms. The average efficiency score before privatization was 49.5 per cent, but the score improved to 62.3 per cent after privatization. However, this minor improvement was not statistically significant as verified by the Mann-Whitney U test. These results have verified the situations in Libya which suggest that firms in Libya have not been prepared for real privatization. Consequently, almost all firms faced difficulties in optimizing their own resources economically.
References
Akram, A. N. (2009). Pre-post performance assessment of privatization process in Pakistan. International Review of Business, 5, 70–86.
Andrews, W., & Dowling, M. (1998). Explaining performance changes in newly privatized firms. Journal of Management Studies, 5(5), 601–617.
Bachiller, P. (2009). Effect of ownership on efficiency in Spanish companies. Management Decision, 47, 289–307.
Bhandari, A. K., & Maiti, P. (2007). Efficiency of Indian manufacturing firms: Textile industry as a case study. International Journal of Business, 6(1), 71–88.
Boardman, A. E., Laurin, C., & Vining, A. R. (2002). Privatization in Canada: Operating and stock price performance with international comparisons. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 137–154.
Boussofiane, A., Martin, S., & Parker, D. (1997). The impact on technical efficiency of the UK privatization programme. Applied Economics, 29, 297–310.
Cabeza, L., & Gomez, S. (2007). Governance and performance of Spanish privatized firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 503–519.
Chao-Chung, K. (2006). Analyzing for production efficiency in telecommunication industry: The Taiwan case. The Business Review, Cambridge, 5, 111.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. The American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–324.
Ephraim, W. C. (2001). Industry and firm effects of privatization in Malawian oligopolistic manufacturing (Working Paper No. WC/02/01).
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Logan, J. (1985). The relative performance of publicly-owned and privately-owned electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 26(1), 89–106.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120, 253–290.
Farrell, M. J., & Fieldhouse, M. (1962). Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 125, 252–267.
Gratton-Lavoie, C. (2000). Essays on privatization (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Lien, D., & Peng, Y. (2001). Competition and production efficiency of telecommunications in OECD countries. Information Economics and Policy, 13(1), 51–76.
Loc, T. D., Lanjouw, G., & Lensink, R. (2006). The impact of privatization on firm performance in a transition economy. Economics of Transition, 14, 349–389.
Maiti, A. K. (2007). Efficiency of Indian manufacturing firms: Textile industry as a case study. International Journal of Business and Economics, 6, 71–88.
Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., & Van Randenborgh, M. (1994). The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49, 403–452.
Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 321–389.
Meliha, A. B. (1996). A rentier state's response to oil crisis: Economic reform policies in Libya. Arab Studies Quarterly.
Moneer, M. (2005). Overview on the public sector in Libya: Economic development in Libya: Past and present. Bengaz, Libya.
Okten, C., & Arin, K. P. (2006). The effects of privatization on efficiency: How does privatization work? World Development, 34, 1537–1556.
Omran, M. (2004). The performance of state-owned enterprises and newly privatized firms: Does privatization really matter? World Development, 32, 1019–1041.
Smith, P. (1993). Outcome related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector. British Journal of Management, 4, 135–151.
Vandewalle, D. J. (1998). Libya since independence: Oil and state building. I.B. Tauris and Co. Ltd., London, England.
Yang, H. H. (2010). Measuring the efficiencies of Asia–Pacific international airports – Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 697–702.
Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamed Saad Mohamed Abokaresh, Badrul Hisham Kamaruddin, Rohani Mohd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
