ASSESSING ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF MALAYSIAN RICE FARMING (1972-2014)
Keywords:
Rice farming, Nominal price, Real PriceAbstract
The recent focus of agricultural planning is on sustainable development which is very pertinent to Malaysian rice industry. Therefore, this study intends to assess the long term economic sustainability of Malaysian rice farming (1972-2014), by reviewing the bottom line of prices and the purchasing power of rice (PPR). Statistical information of time series data on farm harvest price of rice (PR), wholesale commodity price (WP) and rice production for 42 years period was obtained and compiled from the AGROSTAT system of the statistical division of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), World Bank and the Department of Statistics, Malaysia. The data was analysed using Abdullah’s analysis of the impact of changes the value and purchasing power of money and wheat in real terms (2013, p.71). The outcome reveals that the PR follows the general price trend in commodities, even with increased productivity. Thus, the index value of PR in 2014 at 375% of 1972 prices and WP generally at 614%, then the PPR or ‘real rice’ was only 61% of what it was in 1972, and therefore had lost 39% of its purchasing power, signifying that rice was relatively low in price.
References
Abdullah, A. “Examining the value of money in america over the long term (1792- 2009),” Int. J. Econ. & Fin., 10, 58-8 (2013).
American Society of Agronomy., "Decision reached on sustainable agriculture." Agronomy News. January, 15, Madison, Wisconsin (1989).
Athukorala, P. “Trade and development: Malaysian economy in three crises,” (Working paper no.2010/12), The Australian National University. (2010).
Berg A., “The Asia’s crisis: causes, policy responses, and outcomes,” (Working paper no. WP/99/138), Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/1999/wp99138.pdf (1999).
Boansi, D. “Rice yields in Ghana: macro-level response and some prescriptions,” Int. J. Agri Pol & Res., 9, 270-276 (2013).
Daly, Herman E., Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, Beacon Press, Boston, Mass (1996).
Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department Malaysia, “Historical Producer Price Index (1973-2014) (English)”. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/epu-theme/pdf/10.2.2.1.pdf (2014).
Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department Malaysia, “Present Producer Price Index (2005-Current) (English).” Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/documents/10124/e2fa0010-6932-4b42-8d91-cbbfe51855b4 (2014).
Mustapha, N. H., “Sustainable development of Malaysian rice industry in the context of asian countries: an assessment,” J. Econ.Malaysia, 30, 67-86 (1996).
Najim M. M.M, Lee, T. S., Haque, M. A., & Esham M, “Sustainability of rice production: a Malaysian perspective,” J. Agri Sc., 1, 1-12 (2007).
Norsida, M., & Sami, I. S., “Off-farm employment participation among paddy farmers in the Muda Agricultural Development Authority and Kemasin Semerak granary areas of Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Development,” Dev J., Asia-Pacific, 2, 141-153 (2009).
IRRI., “World rice statistics,” Retrieved from http://www.irri.org/index.php? Option=comk2and view=itemlisandlayou=categoryandtask=categoryand id=744andItemid=100346andlang=en (2004).
Pio Lopez, G., Economic reforms for paddy sub-sector, The Star Online, Retrieved from http://biz.thestar.com.my/ news/ story.asp?file =/2007/6/25/ business/18087959&sec=business (2007).
Tan, S.H., Malaysia’s Rice Policy: A Critical Analysis. Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1987).
U.S. Congress., Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Public Law 101-624. U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C (1990).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Academia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.