EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, RELIGIOUSITY AND POLICY, RULES AND REGULATION ON BEHAVIOURAL CHANGE TOWARDS GREEN LIFESTYLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/VoA.v21i1.11788Keywords:
Environmental education, green lifestyle, behavioural change, environmental sustainabilityAbstract
Environmental sustainability is an urgent global concern, necessitating significant behavioral changes at individual and societal levels which calls for conservation. These changes include adopting eco-friendly practices such as consuming green products, supporting the circular economy, reducing waste, and advocating clean energy. Achieving such transformations requires a multi-faceted approach that integrates knowledge dissemination, religious teachings, and policy interventions. This study explores the combined influence of these factors—mediated by subjective norms—on fostering behavioral changes toward environmental sustainability among university students. Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Norm Activation Theory, the study examines how knowledge equips individuals with critical awareness, how Islamic teachings promote values of stewardship and moderation, and how policy frameworks regulate and incentivize sustainable practices. It emphasizes the underexplored role of Islamic principles, which align spiritual values with ecological stewardship, advocating conservation as a sacred trust. Policies aimed at reducing pollution and promoting clean energy are evaluated for their effectiveness in driving behavioral change when aligned with cultural and spiritual dimensions. The study uses PLS-SEM as the tool for analysis. Results conform to the hypotheses where knowledge, religiousity, and policy, rules and regulation with the mediating effect of subjective norms have significant impact on behavioural changes toward environmental sustainability. The study offers theoretical, empirical, and practical contributions by developing an integrative conceptual model, shedding light on youth engagement in sustainability, and informing educational, religious, and policy initiatives. This approach underscores the importance of value-driven, culturally relevant strategies for achieving environmental sustainability.
References
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(3), 190-203.
De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of social psychology, 149(4), 425-449.
Ebreo, A., Vining, J., & Cristancho, S. (2003). Responsibility for environmental problems and the consequences of waste reduction: A test of the norm-activation model. Journal of Environmental Systems, 29(3).
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
Han, H. (2014). The norm activation model and theory-broadening: Individuals' decision-making on environmentally-responsible convention attendance. Journal of environmental psychology, 40, 462-471.
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press
Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., & Antonides, G. (2014). The self‐regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt in a sustainable and healthy consumption context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 53-68.
Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior: International perspectives on positive morality (pp. 229-255). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Academic Press.
Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2015). One model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 8-14.
Yusof, J. M., Singh, G. K. B., & Razak, R. A. (2013). Purchase intention of environment-friendly automobile. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 400-410.
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013). Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Energy Policy, 62, 1120-1127.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
