THE ROLE OF VIRTUAL INFLUENCERS IN SHAPING FASHION PREFERENCES AMONG MALAYSIAN GENERATION ALPHA: PERCEPTIONS, ENGAGEMENT AND CONSUMER TRUST

Authors

  • Normaziana Hassan College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kedah Branch, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Juaini Jamaludin College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kedah Branch, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Syahrini Shawalludin College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kedah Branch, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Asrol Hasan College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kedah Branch, Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/VoA.v21i2.11802

Keywords:

Virtual influencers, Fashion preferences. Generation Alpha, Consumer trust, Digital engagement

Abstract

Virtual influencers have emerged as a powerful force in digital marketing, particularly within the fashion industry. Unlike traditional influencers, these AI-generated personalities engage with audiences through immersive content, shaping trends and consumer preferences. This study examines the role of virtual influencers in influencing fashion choices among Malaysian Generation Alpha, focusing on perceptions, engagement patterns, and consumer trust. Using a quantitative approach, a structured online survey was conducted among 400–500 respondents aged 10–14 years. The findings reveal that Generation Alpha exhibits high engagement with virtual influencers, particularly on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where interactive content fosters deeper connections. Trust in virtual influencers significantly influences purchase intent, with respondents perceiving them as reliable fashion trendsetters. Additionally, economic and cultural factors shape how young consumers interact with these digital personas, as parental guidance and affordability remain key considerations. Multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) confirm that trust and engagement mediate fashion purchasing behavior. These insights provide actionable strategies for brands looking to leverage virtual influencers in digital marketing campaigns targeting young consumers. The study highlights the growing authenticity paradox of virtual influencers, where AI-generated personas can build stronger consumer trust than traditional human influencers. Future research should explore the long-term impact of virtual influencers on brand loyalty and consumer identity formation.

References

Abdullah, N., & Tan, S. (2021). Cultural Diversity and Digital Consumption in Malaysia . Journal of Consumer Behavior.

Digital 2023 Report. (2023). Global Digital Insights . DataReportal.

Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagrammable: Influencer Culture and the Rise of Virtual Celebrities . Polity Press.

Marwick, A. E. (2021). The Algorithmic Self: Identity and Authenticity in the Age of Social Media . MIT Press.

Nguyen, H., Lim, J., & Park, S. (2022). Generation Alpha and Trust in Virtual Influencers . International Journal of Marketing Studies.

Smith, R., & Lee, K. (2022). Digital Natives and the Future of Influencer Marketing . Journal of Advertising Research.

Smith, R., & Anderson, K. (2024). Virtual vs. Human Influencers: A Comparative Analysis of Trust and Engagement . Journal of Advertising Research.

Shen, L., & Kang, J. (2023). The Rise of Virtual Influencers: Strategies for Brand Engagement . Journal of Digital Marketing.

Wang, X., & Chan, Y. (2023). Virtual Influencers: Redefining Brand Communication in the Digital Era . Journal of Interactive Marketing.

Nguyen, H., Lim, J., & Park, S. (2022). Generation Alpha and Trust in Virtual Influencers . International Journal of Marketing Studies.

Zhang, L., & Liu, M. (2022). Gamification and Engagement Strategies in Virtual Influencer Campaigns . Computers in Human Behavior.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hassan, N., Jamaludin, J., Shawalludin, S., & Hasan, A. (2025). THE ROLE OF VIRTUAL INFLUENCERS IN SHAPING FASHION PREFERENCES AMONG MALAYSIAN GENERATION ALPHA: PERCEPTIONS, ENGAGEMENT AND CONSUMER TRUST. Voice of Academia, 21(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.24191/VoA.v21i2.11802