Malaysia’s Dilemma: The Need for a New Identity Politics Framework

Authors

  • Haijon Gunggut Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus
  • Bibianah Thomas Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus
  • Zuraidah Zaaba Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus
  • Saiful Zizi Jalil Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus

Keywords:

identity politics, Malaysian politics, race politics, Marginalized groups, B40

Abstract

The Malaysian politics has been labelled communal politics and rightly so for one of the most dominant and enduring themes of politics in the country is about race. In such politics, most issues are framed within the compartment of race. This essentially is the political narrative in the country since its inception. However, recently many have argued for the transition towards non communal based politics. This article seeks to explore the merits of non-communal politics and communal politics framed within the context of identity versus non-identity politics, arguing that while both have merits that cannot be ignored, both tend to have limitations. Extreme identity politics in term of racial identity tends to be divisive and confrontational while at the other extreme, complete avoidance of identity politics may ignore or sweep over real concerns such as marginalization, neglect, oppression, and discrimination. A more desirable alternative might be accepting identity politics as one of the many themes of politics promoting welfare of the people while rejecting the undesirable extreme version of identity politics. It is clear that the narrow conceptualization of identity politics within the contexts of race and religion may impede the promotion of other identities such as gender and the marginalize. However, a less extreme and positive version of identity politics can promote beneficial and needed social, political, and other changes if framed in a more positive way. Some of the characteristics of a more positive politics of identity include the focus on seeking to improve welfare of the discriminated, marginalized, neglected and/or oppressed groups using non-violence and non-confrontational approach, focusing on similarities and commonalities between opposing groups or identities instead of division and hatred, conceptualization of identity politics beyond communal politics and finally promoting instead of stifling dialogue or conversation in the name of political correctness.

References

Amnesty International. (2010). Trapped: The Exploitation of Migrant Workers in Malaysia. Human Rights. Retrieved from www.amnesty.org

Bernama. (2019, July 2). 99 peratus Orang Asli dalam kumpulan B40 - Jakoa. Malaysiakini. Retrieved from https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/482073

Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385–427.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.

Elumalai, N. 2023. Malaysia: An inclusive policy measure is needed to end hate speech and https://www.article19.org/resources/malaysia-inclusive-policy-measure-needed-to-end-hate-speech/

Gabriel, S. P. (2011). Translating bangsa Malaysia: Toward a new cultural politics of Malaysian-ness. Critical Asian Studies, 43(3), 349–372.

Gardels, N. (2018, September 18). Francis Fukuyama: Identity politics is undermining democracy. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/09/18/identity-politics/.

Hedges, C. (2018). The Bankruptcy of the American Left. Truthdig, Retrieved from https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bankruptcy-american-left/

Hayward, C, R., & Watson, R. (2013). Identity and Political Theory. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 31(1), 1–22.

Hobsbawm, E. (1996). Identity Politics and the Left. Institute of Education, London. Identity Politics (2004). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-politics/

Jones, O (2012). Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class (updated ed.). London, New York: Verso.

Khoo, S. L., Tiun, L. T., & Lee, L. W. (2013). Workplace discrimination against Malaysians with disabilities: Living with it or fighting against it? Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 1–18.

Khor, G. L., & Shariff, Z. M. (2020). BMC Public Health when reporting health and nutrition issues of the socio-economically. BMC Public Health. 19.

Lian, H. F. (2018). “Us versus” “them”: An ideological battle for electorates on political youtube videos in the 2016 Sarawak state election. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(1), 27–49.

Ming, L, L., Azhar, N, A., Hazri. & Mulakala, A. (2012). The Youth Factor: 2012 Survey of Malaysian Youth Opinion. Retrieved from https://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/2012NationalYouthSurvey.pdf

Neofotistos, V. (2013). Identity Politics. Oxford University Press.

Ning, E. C. Y. & Karubi, N. P. (2018). Gender Socialisation and its Relation to Women’s Work and Family Conflict. Trends in Undergraduate Research, 1(1), h11-18.

Nye, Joseph (2012). "China's Soft Power Deficit To catch up, its politics must unleash the many talents of its civil society". The Wall Street Journal, May 8. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304451104577389923098678842. Retrieved 24 November 2023.

O'Neill, B. (2015, February 19). Identity politics has created an army of vicious, narcissistic cowards. The Spectator. Retrieved from https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/identity-politics-has-created-an-army-of-vicious-narcissistic-cowards

Ostwald, K. and Nazri, Muhamad M.N. 2023. Malaysia in 2022: Election Year, Islamization, and Politics of Compromise. Asian Survey, 63(2) 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.63.2.291

Padour, F. (2020). Identity according to Francis Fukuyama: An obstacle to the end of history, Politics in Central Europe, 16 (1), 327-345.

Peredaryenko, M. (2020). Malaysia cannot afford the ‘Trump Effect’. The Edge Markets. Retrieved from https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/malaysia-cannot-afford-trump-effect

Rahman, S. (2018). Was it a Malay tsunami? Deconstructing the Malay vote in Malaysia’s 2018 election. Round Table, 107(6), 669–682.

Rasheed, A. (2020). Identity politics and the threat to individualism. Alarabia, 1–5.

Schlesinger, A. M. J. (1991). The disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society (Revised and Enlarged Edition). Knoxville, Tenn: Whittle Direct Books.

Welsh, B. (2020). Malaysia’s Political Polarization: Race, Religion, and Reform. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.). Political Polarization in South and Southeast Asia: Old Divisions, New Dangers (pp.41-52). Carnegie Endowment in International Peace.

Zavarzade, A. (2021). Identity Politics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-05

How to Cite

Haijon Gunggut, Bibianah Thomas, Zuraidah Zaaba, & Saiful Zizi Jalil. (2024). Malaysia’s Dilemma: The Need for a New Identity Politics Framework . Journal of Administrative Science, 20(2), 76–89. Retrieved from https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JAS/article/view/2525