The Three Dimensions of China’s Comprehensive National Power (CNP): Hard, Soft & Smart
Keywords:
China, Comprehensive National Power (CNP), Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart PowerAbstract
Asian countries such as China and India have established and developed their own concepts of national power. It is a comprehensive re-assessment of what created national power especially after the end of the Cold War which involved the United States of America and Russia, as well as the Asian and Trans Atlantic monetary crises. Clearly, China was advanced when it suggested the concept of its Comprehensive National Power (CNP). Basically, the power usage would be grounded on an entire national vision which is mainly based on its people aspirations added with strong leadership ability. China’s CNP is distinctive based on the Chinese people perspectives, yet different from the Western national power. To understand further about China’s national power, this article aims to investigate certain concepts about China’ CNP. The article also seeks to answer questions on what entails China’s CNP and also the dimensions of China’s CNP. The objective of this article is to examine the three dimensions of China’s CNP in terms of hard, soft, and smart power. Overall, this article argues that China’s CNP has a wider coverage, emphasising completeness and factors such as material strength, economy and influence. This article is based on qualitative methodology using document analysis of various reading documents and journals. Relevant themes were analysed and categorised to come up with themes to illustrate the different components of concepts pertaining to China’s CNP - hard, soft and smart power.
References
Bajwa, J. S. (2008). Defining Elements of Comprehensive National Power. CLAWS Journal, 151-162.
Brown, K. (2017). China's World: What Does China Want? I.B.Tauris. Kindle Edition. Kindle Locations 197-350. BRICS India 2021: Ministry of External Affairs.
Baru. S. (2021). Defining National Power and Capability. Policy Review. http://policyreview.in/on-national-power-and-capability-by-sanjaya-baru/.
Berg, R. C. (2021). China in Latin America and the Caribbean. Statement Before the US–China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing, Washington, DC, 2021-05.
Bi, S. (2021). Cooperation between China and ASEAN under the building of ASEAN Economic Community. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 83-107.
Brics India (2021). Ministry of External Affairs. (n.d.). Retrieved January 14, 2022, from https://brics2021.gov.in/about-brics.
Chuwattananurak, W. (2014). China’s Political Stability and Comprehensive National Power: A Case Study of the Conflict in Xinjiang. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 11(9), 721-741.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215.
Elder, C. & Ayson, R. (2012). China‘s Rise and New Zealand‘s Interests: A Policy Primer for 2030, Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS), Discussion Paper No. 11.
Hu Angang (2002). The Rising of Modern China: Comprehensive National Power and Grand Strategy. Center for China Studies at Tsinghua University. Available at http://www.irchina.org/en/pdf/hag.pdf. P 3, 4.
Jinchen, T. (2016). One Belt and One Road‘: Connecting China and the World, Available Online at https://www.mckinsey.com/.../one-belt-an.
Jung, J. Y., Wang, W., & Cho, S. W. (2020). The Role of Confucius Institutes and
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Aiman Nasuha Azari, Suseela Devi Chandran, Farhatul Mustamirrah Mahamad Aziz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.