Determining Elements of Design Thinking Implementation in Schools Using Fuzzy Delphi Method

Authors

  • Adila Md Hashim Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Sharipah Ruzaina Syed Aris Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Chan Yuen Fook Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Keywords:

Design Thinking, Fuzzy Delphi, Design-Based Learning

Abstract

Design thinking is a design-based learning strategy that flourishes on experiential learning and evolves from the study of unique ways to solve real-world problems. The growing interest in embedded design thinking in educational contexts has given the opportunity for design thinking to be utilised by younger students in schools. This study aims to identify the elements of design thinking implementation for teachers to plan a design-based learning strategy in schools. A total of eight experts were selected to analyse the fuzziness consensus of experts. All collected data were analysed using the Fuzzy Delphi Method. The results show that 40 of the 54 elements meet the conditions in which the threshold value, d is less than 0.2 and the percentage of the expert group is more than 75%. Two elements that were first rejected are added to the list to fulfil the purpose of the design thinking approach. Therefore, based on the consensus of the experts, the elements of design thinking implementation can be used by teachers as a guideline to apply design thinking in schools.

References

Awang, S., Ahmad, S., Alias, N., & Dewitt, D. (2016). Design of an Instructional Module on Basic Life Support for Homeschooled Children. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1188439.

Baker, J., Lovell, K., & Harris, N. (2006). How Expert are the Experts? An Exploration of the Concept of 'Expert' within Delphi Panel Techniques. Nurse Researcher, 14(1).

Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). Autism-"Autos": Literally, a Total Focus on the Self? In The Lost Self: Pathologies of the Brain and Identity (pp. 166–180). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173413.003.0011

Bayles, D., & Orland, T. (1993). Art and Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking. Image Continuum Press.

Boud, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. In R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Routledge. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315059051.

Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of Creativity in Design Based Learning in STEM Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503–529.

Bratsberg, H. M. (2012). Empathy Maps of the FourSight Preferences. Buffalo State College.

Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The Creativity Crisis. Newsweek. https://doi.org/10.1037/e574802013-336.

Chen, F. G., Chen, J. S., Wang, J. Y., & Tai, D. W. S. (2017). Using Fuzzy Delphi Method to Construct Digital Literacy Competences for Junior High School

Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(9), 686–689.

Chen, P., & Huang, R. (2017). Design Thinking in App Inventor Game Design and Development: A Case Study. IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.161.

Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank Using Fuzzy Decision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03772217(01)00280-6.

Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A Technique to Harness Expert Opinion for Critical Decision-Making Tasks in Education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401.

Clemente, V., Vieira, R., & Tschimmel, K. (2016). A Learning Toolkit to Promote Creative and Critical Thinking in Product Design and Development through Design Thinking. Engineering Education (CISPEE), 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society For, 1–6.

Collins, J., & Hansen, M. T. (2011). Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck-Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. Random House.

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). Stage 4 in the Design Thinking Process: Prototype. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-4-in-the-design-thinking-process-prototype.

Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and Acting Like a Designer: How Design Thinking Supports Innovation in K-12 Education. https://www.wise-qatar.org/sites/default/files/rr.1.2017__ideo.pdf

Gulistan Ahmed, M. A. (2016). Development of a Higher Order Thinking Teaching Model for Basic Education Students in Science. University of Malaya.

Hanney, R. (2019). Rethinking Project-Based Learning in a Changing Higher Education Landscape: Design Thinking as a Paradigm for Media Making. 3rd Active Learning Network Conference.

Hashim, A. M., Aris, S. R. S., & Fook, C. Y. (2019). Promoting Empathy Using Design Thinking in Project-Based Learning and as a Classroom Culture. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 14–23.

Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method Via Fuzzy Integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241–253.

Ito, M., Naoe, N., Imazawa, A., & Matsushita, O. (2015). Introduction of Adapting Design Thinking Into the Education in Kanazawa Technical College. Engineering Education (ICEED), IEEE 7th International Conference On, 25–28.

Kamarulzaman, N., Jomhari, N., Mohd Raus, N., & Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff, M. (2016). Applying the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Analyse the user Requirement for user Centred Design Process in Order to Create Learning Applications. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(32). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i32/92146

Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z.

Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163.

Mahil, S. (2016). Fostering STEM+ education: Improve design thinking skills. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 125–129.

Mat Noh, N., Siraj, S., Halili, S. H., Mohd Jamil, M. R., & Husin, Z. (2019). Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi Terhadap Keperluan Elemen Teknologi Sebagai Wadah Dalam Pembelajaran Berasaskan Pemikiran Reka Bentuk (Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method as a Vital. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34, 129–151.

Matthiesen, N., & Klitmøller, J. (2019). Encountering the Stranger: Hannah Arendt and the Shortcomings of Empathy as a Moral Compass. Theory and Psychology, 29(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319828174.

Mohd Jamil, M. R., Siraj, S., Hussin, Z., Mat Noh, N. R., & Sapar, A. A. (2017). Pengenalan Asas Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam Penyelidikan Rekabentuk dan Pembangunan. Minda Intelek Agency.

Mohd Yusof, N. A. A., Siraj, S., Md Nor, M., & Ariffin, A. (2018). Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM): Determining Phase for Multicultural-Based Model of Peace Education Curriculum for Preschool Children. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teacher & Teacher Education, 8(1), 5–17.

Noel, L. A., & Liu, T. L. (2017). Using Design Thinking to Create a New Education Paradigm for Elementary Level Children for Higher Student Engagement and Success. Design and Technology Education:The International Journal, 22(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.200.

Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A Framework to Foster Problem-Solving in STEM and Computing Education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130.

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique. In Principles of forecasting (pp. 125–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_7.

Saaty, T. L., & Özdemir, M. S. (2014). How Many Judges Should There Be in a Group ? Annals of Data Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-014-0026-4

Serpes, C., & Menon, G. (2017). A Conceptual Model for Introducing Design Thinking in Management Schools. International Conference on Research into Design, 987-997.

Tadić, D., Đorđević, M. Z., Puškarić, H., & Aleksić, A. (2015). A New Fuzzy Delphi Method for Evaluation of Business Goal. 9th International Quality Conference, June, 423–430.

Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an Effective Toolkit for Innovation. Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference: Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience, 20. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2570.3361.

Valentim, N. M. C., Silva, W., & Conte, T. (2017). The Students' Perspectives on Applying Design Thinking for the Design of Mobile Applications. Proceedings of IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering and Education Track, ICSE-SEET 2017, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2017.10.

Van Rooij, S. W. (2012). Research-based Personas: Teaching Empathy in Professional Education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 77–86.

Withell, A., & Haigh, N. (2014). Developing Design Thinking Expertise in Higher Education. September.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-13

How to Cite

Adila Md Hashim, Sharipah Ruzaina Syed Aris, & Chan Yuen Fook. (2024). Determining Elements of Design Thinking Implementation in Schools Using Fuzzy Delphi Method . Journal of Administrative Science, 19(1), 210–232. Retrieved from https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JAS/article/view/2630