The Graphical Representation of Clothing Store Location and Its Application with Potential Method

Authors

  • Khairunnisha Amira Johar Kolej Pengajian Pengkomputeran, Informatik & Matematik, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban, 70300 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Adam Hafiz Nor Mohd Amin Kolej Pengajian Pengkomputeran, Informatik & Matematik, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban, 70300 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Fared Tuah Kolej Pengajian Pengkomputeran, Informatik & Matematik, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban, 70300 Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Siti Salwana Mamat Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v22i1.3656

Keywords:

Decision making, Multicriteria decision making, Analytic hierarchy process, Potential method

Abstract

Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a widely utilized approach for addressing decision problems by assessing pairwise comparisons of alternatives. MCDM involves evaluating various elements as input and deriving weighted outcomes for each alternative. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Potential Method (PM) are two examples of tools within MCDM. The PM employs a directed graph known as a preference, generated through paired comparisons, to establish a value function for the set of alternatives. In this study, PM is applied to the store location selection problem, with AHP already providing results. The objective is to demonstrate the use of PM in decision-making. The obtained results are then compared, revealing similar rankings for alternatives between the two methods. Consequently, PM is deemed comparable to AHP in effectively addressing real-life problems with multiple criteria.

References

Akalin, M., Turhan, G., & Sahin, A. (2013). The Application of AHP Approach for Evaluating Location Selection Elements for Retail Store: A Case of Clothing Store. In International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 2(4), 1-20.

Čaklović, L. (2003). Graph Distance in Multicriteria Decision Making Context. Metodološki Zvezki, 19, 25-3.

Čaklović, L., & Radas, S. (2014). Application of Potential Method to survey analysis, Mathematical Communications. 19, 397- 415.

Čaklović, L., & Kurdija, A. S. (2017). A universal voting system based on the Potential Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 677-688.

Canco, I., Kruja, D., & Iancu, T. (2021). AHP, a reliable method for quality decision making: A case study in business. Sustainability, 13(24), 13932.

Guillén-Mena, V., Quesada-Molina, F., Astudillo-Cordero, S., Lema, M., & Ortiz-Fernández, J. (2023). Lessons learned from a study based on the AHP method for the assessment of sustainability in neighborhoods. MethodsX, 11, 102440.

Mamat, S. S., Ahmad, T., Awang, S. R., & Mukaram, M. Z. (2019). Ranking by Fuzzy Weak Autocatalytic Set. In Soft Computing in Data Science: 4th International Conference, SCDS 2018, Bangkok, Thailand, August 15-16, 2018, Proceedings 4 (pp. 161-172). Springer Singapore.

Panpatte, S., & Takale, V. D. (2019). To study the decision making process in an organization for its effectiveness. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(1), 73-78.

Terzi, E. (2019). Analytic hierarchy process (ahp) to solve complex decision problems. Southeast Europe Journal of Soft Computing, 8(1), 5-12.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Johar, K. A. ., Mohd Amin, M. A. H. N., Tuah, M. F. ., & Mamat, S. S. (2025). The Graphical Representation of Clothing Store Location and Its Application with Potential Method. Journal of Administrative Science, 22(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v22i1.3656