Institutional Barriers and Policy Opportunities for Heirloom Rice in Sabah: A Preliminary Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v22i2.5486Keywords:
Heirloom Rice, Sabah Agriculture, Food Security, Institutions, PrioritisationAbstract
The problem to be addressed in this article is linked to the limitations that hinder the sustainability and growth of heirloom rice within Sabah’s policy framework. As heirloom rice considered as a crop of high cultural and ecological value however, it remains underrepresented in the state’s agricultural context. Current agricultural policies prioritize high-yield commercial rice, thereby marginalizing heirloom varieties that lack formal support for financial, genetic, or market development. The objective of this paper is to analyse and discuss the institutional barriers that hinder the sustainability and growth of heirloom rice in Sabah. Using a qualitative approach grounded in institutional theory, data were collected through purposive sampling of key informants with expert knowledge and experience in the sector. Thematic analysis revealed four major barriers: (1) policy frameworks and institutional neglect that sideline heirloom rice, (2) limited prioritization within state agricultural agendas (3) weak market demand and fragmented value chains, and (4) structural barriers to farmer support, including infrastructure, incentives, and generational continuity.The study highlights the need for realigned institutional priorities, enhanced collaboration, and targeted support structures to integrate heirloom rice into Sabah’s agricultural framework. Policy reforms and dedicated support can foster sustainability, cultural preservation, and agricultural resilience within Sabah’s food systems.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The role of institutions in growth and development. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i2.14.
Ang, Y. Y. (2016). How China escaped the poverty trap.
Arshad, F. M., Noh, K. M., & Farhana, R. A. (2019). Kajian empirikal kesan subsidi ke atas pengeluaran padi dan pendapatan petani.
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, D. (2007). The study of critical junctures. World Politics, 59(April), 341-369.
Clapp, J., Moseley, W. G., Burlingame, B., & Termine, P. (2022). Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework. In Food Policy (Vol. 106). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102164.
Daniel, T. K. H., & Yap, P.-S. (2020). A systematic review of slash-and-burn agriculture as an obstacle to future-proofing climate change. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Climate Change, 4(1), 1–19.
FAO (1996). Rome declaration on world food security. https://www.fao.org/3/w3613e/w3613e00.htm [accessed on 20 February 2025].
FAO. (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. www.foodsec.org
FAO. (2023). Global food security challenges and its drivers: conflicts and wars in Ukraine and other countries, slowdowns and downturns, and climate change. (Issue March). www.fao.org/3/nl652en/nl652en.pdf.
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO. (2023). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2023. Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. 10(9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3017en.
Fernandez-Wulff, P. (2019). Collective agency in the making: how social innovations in the food system practice democracy beyond consumption. Politics and Governance, 7(4), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2111.
Firdaus, R. B. R., Leong Tan, M., Rahmat, S. R., & Senevi Gunaratne, M. (2020). Paddy, rice and food security in Malaysia: A review of climate change impacts. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1818373.
Garnett, P., Doherty, B., & Heron, T. (2020). Vulnerability of the United Kingdom’s food supply chains exposed by COVID-19. Nature Food, 1(6), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0097-7.
Gimbad, E. (2020). Cultivating rice and identity: An ethnography of the Dusun People in Sabah, Malaysia [Western Sydney University]. In Western Sydney University. https://doi.org/10.51142/ISSUES-JOURNAL-3-1-3.
Hashmi, M. I., & Tianlin, J. S. (2016). Mineral contents of some indigenous rice varieties of Sabah Malaysia. International Journal of Agriculture, 2, 31–34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321019867.
HLPE. (2020). Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. in high level panel of experts. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf.
IDS. (2024). Championing Heirloom Rice in Sabah : Production, Promotion and Sustainability (Unpublished report).
International Food Policy Research Institute. (2022). Food and fertilizer price trends: impacts on global food security. https://www.ifpri.org/spotlight/food-fertilizers-and-nutrition-rising-prices-and-global-food-security.
Jomo, K. S. (2004). The New Economic Policy and interethnic relations in Malaysia. In UNRISD (Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254203-12.
Kementerian Pertanian Keterjaminan Makanan. (2021). Dasar Agromakanan Negara 2021-2030 (DAN 2.0).
Malaysia. (1965). First Malaysia Plan 1966-1970. https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RMK1.pdf.
Malaysia. (1976). Third Malaysia Plan 1976-1980. https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RMK3.pdf.
Neoh, W. T., & Lum, M. S. (2018). Nutritional Quality of Rice Variety in Sabah, Malaysia. Transactions on Science and Technology, 5(2), 88–92. http://transectscience.org/.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (J. Alt & D. North (eds.)). Cambridge University Press.
Sarena Che Omar, Abdul Hamid, & Gobilik, J. (2022). Chapter 5: Characterising paddy varieties in East Malaysia. In the paddy and rice industry of Sabah and Sarawak: Status and potential (pp. 130-157). Khazanah Research Institute. Retrieved from https://krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/EM%20Rice%20Report_website's%20copy_v5.pdf.
Suffian. (2019). The Role of institutions and development: the political economy of Malaysia’s Industrial Policy-Making. Journal of Administrative Science, 16(1), 1–33.
Suffian, F. (2023). Skewed priorities in Sabah’s food policies: (post-)pandemic mediated deglobalisation and food security. In Social and Political Deglobalisation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6823-7.
Suffian, F., Jamluddin, I. S., & Suffian, F. (2022). Institutional analysis of food security in Sabah. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 7(46), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.55573/JISED.074608.
Suffian, F., & Suffian, F. (2023). Policy analysis: food security in Malaysia. Journal of Administrative Science, 20, 91–111. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/54535
The Star. (2025, May 10). Sabah launches padi, rice board to boost food self-sufficiency. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2025/05/10/sabah-launches-padi-rice-board-to-boost-food-self-sufficiency.
Vivero-Pol, J. L. (2017). Food as commons or commodity? exploring the links between normative valuations and agency in food transition. Sustainability, 9(3), 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030442.
Wong, L., Kam, A., Zaeidah, M. E., & Kassim, Q. (2024). Policy brief: Malaysia’s long-term food security: the path beyond self-sufficiency ratios and import-dependent ratios. In ISIS Malaysia (Issue March).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faridah Suffian, Haijon Gunggut, Hendry Joseph, Firdausi Suffian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
