STAD Enhances SATB Writing Among The Music Students

Authors

  • Peter Ong Faculty of Education, Open University Malaysia
  • Eng Tek Ong UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jca.v1i2.1952

Keywords:

STAD, cooperative learning, music education, SATB

Abstract

Even though the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) cooperative learning method has been studied in many subjects and grades, relatively little is known about how it affects student achievement in music theory, particularly in the learning of SATB (Soprano, Alto, Tenor and Bass). The purpose of this study  was to investigate the effectiveness of the STAD cooperative learning method in enhancing students’ achievement in music theory, particularly in the learning of SATB (soprano, alto, tenor, and bass) concepts. The experimental group had 12 students (4 boys and 8 girls), while the control group included 8 students (2 boys and 6 girls), using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group research design. These pupils were chosen at random from two Kuala Lumpur-area private music schools. A pretest was given to see whether the two groups were comparable before to the intervention, despite the fact that the students already have the required Grade 5 pass in theory of music from the Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM). After the 4-week intervention, there was a posttest. The STAD cooperative technique cycles through classroom instruction by the teacher, group study by the students, individual quizzes, and team recognition. In traditional instruction, the teacher gives a lecture before assigning students to complete seatwork on their own. The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group, according to the Mann-Whitney U test results (U = 0.00, p.001). According to the findings of this study, using the STAD cooperative learning method did improve students' ability to learn music.

References

Aldwell, E, &Schachter, C. (1989). Harmony and Voice Leading (2nded). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Baughman, M., & Kennedy, M. A. (Eds.). (2021). Musicality reimagined: Transforming the classical music core. Oxford University Press.

David, V.K. (2017). Why teach part-writing? US: Lincoln, Nebraska.

Dendup, T., & Onthanee, A. (2020). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on English communicative ability of 4th grade students in Bhutan. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 255-266.

Hoffman, A. R., & Palmer, K. (2022). Music education and social emotional learning: Intersecting narratives. National Association for Music Education.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021). Learning together and alone: The history of our involvement in cooperative learning. In Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Classroom Practice for Diverse Approaches to CL (44-62). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106760-3

Kulma, D. and Naxer, M. (2014). "Beyond Part Writing: Modernizing the Curriculum." Engaging Students: Essays in Music Pedagogy 2. http://flipcamp.org/engagingstudents2/essays/kulmaNaxer.html.

Ong, C. (2020). ABRSM music theory. Singapore: Thomson.

Piston, W. (1987).Harmony:5th edition. NY: W.W. Norton &Company.

Schenker, H. (1954). Harmony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Centre for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.

Victoria, W. (2017). Grade six music theory-rules of harmony. UK: Sawston Cambridgeshire.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-24

How to Cite

Ong, P., & Ong, E. T. (2024). STAD Enhances SATB Writing Among The Music Students . Journal of Creative Arts, 1(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.24191/jca.v1i2.1952