The Levels of Creative Design Processes with Computer Graphic Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jca.v1i2.3555Keywords:
Design Process, Creative Process, Creative, Psychology, Computer GraphicsAbstract
This article aims to describe the layers of creative processes of Design when it is carried out with Computer Graphic Tools (CGT). This article reviews and explores cognitive theories that is largely discussed within the fields of creativity research. Theories and concepts that is discuss includes the adaptation process by Jean Piaget, Divergent and Convergent Thinking that is proposed by Guilford, and Analogical thinking. In line with the discussion is the weaving of these theories with the design process. From the existing literature in these fields of study, the article conceptualized the layers of creative processes of design during its interaction with CGT. The review is significant especially to understand how designers think in producing artwork using computers.
References
REFERENCE
Atkinson, D. P., & Barker, D. R. (2023). AI and the social construction of creativity. Convergence, 29(4), 1054-1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231187730
Ayman-Nolley, S. (2010). A Piagetian perspective on the dialectic process of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 12 (4): 267-275.
Baer, J. (2010). Is Creativity domain specific?. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, by James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg, 321-341. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bailey, J. (2020). The Tools of Generative Art, From Flash to Neural Networks. January 8. https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/generative-art-tools-flash-processing-neural-networks-1202674657/?fbclid=IwAR0fz-BpnnrLJu0-9fpMBZ_tt8jdPoKILJGldjjZ6WY96Kn69_Q0vAmLX9M.
Bonnardel, N. & Marmeche, E. (2004). Evocation Processes by Novice and Expert Designers: Towards Stimulating Analogical Thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management 13 (3): 176-186.
Bonnardel, N., and Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in Design: An Enhancement?. Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (2): 180-191. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x
Brown, P. (2009). CAD: Do computers aid the design process after all?. Intersect 2 (1): 52-66.
Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review. June. http://www.hbr.org
Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and Creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies 38: 54-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002.
Cropley, A. (2006). In Praise of Convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal 18 (3): 391-404.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies 3 (4): 221-227.
Dahl, D.W., and Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 47-60.
Gabora, L. & Kaufman, S.B.(2010). Evolutionary approaches to creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, by James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg, 279-300. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gick, M.L., and Holyoak. K.J.(1983). Schema Induction and Analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15: 1-38.
Goldschmidt, G. (2016). Linkographic evidence for concurrent divergent and convergent thinking in creative design. Creativity Research Journal 28 (2): 115-122.
Guilford, J.P. (1956). The Structure of Intellect. Psychological Bulletin 53 (4): 267-293.
Kanisauskas, S. (2016). Creative Technologies entrapped by instrumental mind. Folosofija, Sociologija 27 (1): 40-50.
Kay, A. C. (1991). Computers, Networks and Education. Scientific American. September.
Kitchener, K.S. (1983). Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition: A Three-level of Cognitive Processing. Human Development 26: 222-232.
Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba E.G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Locher, P.J. (2010). How does a visual artist create an artwork? In The Cambridge handbook of creativity, by James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg, 131-144. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Long, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003-2012). Creativity Research Journal 26 (4): 427-438.
Magner, T.J. (2017). Technology and creativity. In Creativity & Innovation: Theory, Research and Practice, by Jonathan A. Plucker. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
Naylor, G. (1985). The Bauhaus reassessed : sources and design theory. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Paul, C. (2008). Digital art : Revised and expanded edition. New York: Thames & Hudson world of art.
Piaget, J. (2001). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge Classics.
Pulaski, M. A. S. (1971). Understanding Piaget: An introduction to children's cognitive development. New York: Harper & Row.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An Analysis of Creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42 (7): 305-310.
Robertson, B.F., & D.F. Radcliffe. (2009). Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design 41: 136-146. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.007.
Runco, M. A. (2023). AI can only produce artificial creativity. Journal of Creativity. 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100063
Runco, M. A., and Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity" Creativity Research Journal 24 (1).
Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J.-M., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G.E., Glăveanu, V., Hanchett Hanson, M., Ivcevic, Z., Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J.C., Okada, T., Reiter-Palmon, R. and Gaggioli, A. (2023), Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration. Journal of Creative Behavior, 57: 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.597
Williams, R., Runco M.A, & Berlow, B.(2016). Mapping the themes, impact and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal 28 (4): 385-394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohd Hafnidzam Adzmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
