Comparing petro-plastic and bioplastics supply chains: Firm-level insights from the packaging industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v14i1.9025Keywords:
bioplastics petro-plastics supply chain practices sourcing production distribution packaging industryAbstract
This paper empirically compares supply chain practices between petro-plastic and bioplastic carrier-bag industries. It examines how sourcing, production, and distribution differ between established fossil-based chains and emerging compostable alternatives, and how these differences affect operational performance and transition feasibility. A qualitative comparative design was applied to two product-based supply chains, petro-plastic and bioplastic carrier bags—within the packaging industry. Evidence was derived from 17 semi-structured interviews with senior executives, factory managers, buyers, and association representatives across Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Australasia. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-step thematic approach, identifying three core themes: sourcing practices, production configurations, and distribution structures. The results reveal pronounced divergences in sourcing stability, process maturity, and distribution scalability. Petro-plastic chains benefit from global supplier networks and cost efficiency, while bioplastic chains face supply constraints, quality variability, and regionalized logistics. Managers must reconfigure sourcing, production, and logistics capabilities to align efficiency with sustainability compliance. This study advances sustainable supply chain literature by providing firm-level comparative evidence on how material transitions reshape operational practices in the packaging sector.
References
Al-Salem, S. M., Lettieri, P., & Baeyens, J. (2009). Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review. Waste Management, 29(10), 2625–2643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dilkes-Hoffman, L. S., Pratt, S., Laycock, B., Ashworth, P., & Lant, P. A. (2019). Public attitudes towards plastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 147, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.005
Di Bartolo, A., Infurna, G., & Dintcheva, N. T. (2021). A review of bioplastics and their adoption in the circular economy. Polymers, 13(8), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081229
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
European Bioplastics. (2023). Bioplastics market data 2023. Berlin: European Bioplastics. https://www.european-bioplastics.org/market
Filho, W. L., Barbir, J., Abubakar, I. R., Paço, A., Stasiskiene, Z., Hornbogen, M., Fendt, M. T. C., Voronova, V., & Klõga, M. (2022). Consumer attitudes and concerns with bioplastics use: An international study. PLoS ONE, 17(4), e0266918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266918
Findrik, E., & Meixner, O. (2023). Drivers and barriers for consumers purchasing bioplastics – A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137311
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Golicic, S. L., & Sebastiao, H. J. (2011). Supply chain strategy in nascent markets: The role of supply chain development in the commercialization process. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2158-1592.2011.01021.x
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009). Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
Nielsen, T. D., Holmberg, K., & Stripple, J. (2019). Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags. Waste Management, 87, 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.025
Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of ten exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x
Papong, S., Malakul, P., Trungkavashirakun, R., Wenunun, P., Chom-In, T., Nithitanakul, M., & Sarobol, E. (2014). Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.030
Peelman, N., Ragaert, P., De Meulenaer, B., Adons, D., Peeters, R., Cardon, L., Van Impe, F., & Devlieghere, F. (2013). Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 32(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.06.003
Rujnić-Sokele, M., & Pilipović, A. (2017). Challenges and opportunities of biodegradable plastics: A mini review. Waste Management & Research, 35(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16683272
Saad, S., Udin, Z. M., & Hasnan, N. (2014). Dynamic supply chain practices in Malaysia: A case study in oil and gas company. In 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET) (pp. 224–229). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2014.6936510
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
Spierling, S., Röttger, C., Venkatachalam, V., Mudersbach, M., Herrmann, C., & Endres, H. J. (2018). Bio-based plastics-a building block for the circular economy? Procedia CIRP, 69, 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.017
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
van den Oever, M., Molenveld, K., van der Zee, M., & Bos, H. (2017). Bio-based and biodegradable plastics: Facts and figures: Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands (Wageningen Food & Biobased Research No. 1722). Wageningen Food & Biobased Research. https://doi.org/10.18174/408350
Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.007
Walker, S., & Rothman, R. (2020). Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121158
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ayoub Danka, Shatina Saad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
