The Effect of pH on the Corrosion Rate of 316L Stainless Steel, Nitinol, and Titanium-6% Aluminium-4% Vanadium in Hank's Solution

Authors

  • Nik Rozlin Nik Masdek
  • Nor’Aini Wahab
  • Natasha Ahmad Nawawi
  • Aznul Tajudin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v18i1.11389

Keywords:

titanium, Nitinol, stainless steel, corrosion rate, pH value

Abstract

Nowadays, the application of 316L Stainless Steel, Nitinol and Ti-6Al- 4V alloys as biomaterials have become popular due to their implant performance and durability. In this research work, the effect of pH on the corrosion rate of 316L Stainless Steel, Nitinol and Ti-6Al-4V alloys have been investigated. An electrochemical method was applied to investigate the corrosion behaviour of these biomaterials under simulated biological condition. The potentiodynamic polarisation were performed in a Hank’s solution with a pH value of 7.4 (neutral) and 5.2 (acidic). SEM, XRD, microhardness and surface roughness were also carried out to characterise the corroded surface. The potentiodynamic polarisation results showed that both Ti-6Al-4V and 316L stainless steel had high corrosion rate at pH 5.2 (acidic) as compared to pH 7.4 (neutral). The corrosion rate for Ti-6Al-4V alloys was 22.80×10-3 mmpy at pH 7.4 and increased to 23.65×10-3 mmpy at pH 5.2. Similar behaviour was observed for 316L stainless steel where the corrosion rate increasing from 2.387×10-3 mmpy at pH 7.4 to 5.325×10-3 mmpy at pH 5.2. However, different corrosion behaviour was observed for Nitinol as the corrosion rate decreasing from 17.65×10-3 mmpy to16.04×10-3 mmpy at pH 7.4 and pH 5.2, respectively. Hence, the decrease in pH value was found to not cause any significant effect on the corrosion resistance of Nitinol as compared to 316L SS and Ti-6Al-4V alloys.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Nik Masdek, N. R., Wahab, N., Nawawi, N. A., & Tajudin, A. (2021). The Effect of pH on the Corrosion Rate of 316L Stainless Steel, Nitinol, and Titanium-6% Aluminium-4% Vanadium in Hank’s Solution. Scientific Research Journal, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24191/srj.v18i1.11389