Analyzing Furniture Mediation of Everyday Practices in High-Density Student Dormitories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/ijad.v10i2/tz66gv50Keywords:
Dormitory furniture, Everyday practices, High-density student dormitories, Spatial orderAbstract
This study focuses on high-density student dormitories as a shared living environment and examines how dormitory furniture mediates students’ everyday practices in recurrent ways, participating in the formation of spatial order and adaptive practices under conditions of limited space. Adopting a human–furniture–environment perspective, the study draws on semi-structured interviews as the primary data source, supplemented by on-site spatial observations and photographic documentation for contextual validation. Through thematic analysis, four modes of furniture mediation are identified: furniture as spatial constraint, as bodily guide, as boundary mediator, and as trigger condition. The findings reveal that furniture mediates the formation of everyday practices through a chained process of “spatial redistribution–behavioral adjustment–relational reconfiguration,” highlighting an ongoing tension between spatial efficiency and individual agency. The study reconceptualizes dormitory furniture from passive facilities to active elements in the generation of practice, thereby extending practice-oriented interpretations of high-density shared living environments.
References
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Brooks/Cole.
Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in students’ housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.006
Aslanoğlu, R., Ulusoy, B., & Kazak, J. (2024). Air quality of private interiors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of dormitory interiors as shared spaces. Sustainability, 16(2), 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020886
Awal, S. (2020). Public, private & in-between spaces in student housing. https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2020.15
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
Beder, D., & İmamoğlu, Ç. (2023). Correlates of dormitory satisfaction and differences involving social density and room locations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10040-2
Bickman, L., Teger, A., Gabriele, T., McLaughlin, C., Berger, M., & Sunday, E. (1973). Dormitory density and helping behavior. Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657300500405
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Cao, H., Ye, H., Tian, Y., et al. (2025). Functional areas shape indoor microbial structure and potential risks in university dormitories. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1604064
Castellucci, H. I., Arezes, P. M., & Molenbroek, J. F. M. (2014). Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.012
Clapham, D. (2018). Housing theory, housing research and housing policy. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1366937
Dizaj, M. D., & Khanghahi, T. H. (2021). Students’ residential preferences: A case study of dormitories. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(4), 1348–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1941987
Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021
Ghani, Z., & Sulaiman, N. (2021). Drivers for off-campus students housing demand in Malaysia. Path of Science, 7(6), 6001–6013. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.66-8
Gu, H., & Smith, D. P. (2020). ‘Living off the campus’: Urban geographies of change and studentification in Beijing, China. Urban Geography, 41(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1659071
He, W., & Zeng, N. (2025). The relationship between university dormitory environmental factors and students’ informal learning experiences: A case study of three universities in Guangdong Province. Buildings, 15(14), 2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142518
Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879
Kelemen, P., & Lončar, S. (2024). How do students live in student housing? Etnološka istraživanja. https://doi.org/10.32458/ei.29.8
Li, Y., Cheng, F., & Wei, R. (2023). Optimization evaluation model of student dormitory design scheme based on multiple evaluation
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ting Li, Wan Noor Faaizah Wan Omar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



