Innovation of Digital Multimedia: Recognizing the Advantages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/eaj.v12i2.12224Keywords:
C++ functions, normalized gain, educational technology, multimedia, computer science educationAbstract
This study explores the effectiveness of an innovative multimedia application as a teaching tool for improving students' understanding of C++ functions. The intervention incorporated advanced visualization techniques and rich multimedia elements to create a dynamic learning experience. The primary objective was to assess the intervention's impact on students' comprehension and evaluate its educational significance. A total of 33 participants underwent pre-test and post-test assessments, with the normalized gain (N-Gain) serving as the key metric for improvement. The calculated NGain was approximately 0.6336, indicating a moderate improvement in students' performance following the intervention. The discussion interprets the N-Gain in the context of the study's objectives and practical implications. Notably, the study underscores the e-content application's effectiveness in achieving educational goals and its potential for broader implementation in computer science education. Despite limitations such as sample size and context-specific factors, this research highlights the importance of innovative educational approaches in the digital age. It contributes to the evolving landscape of educational technology and pedagogy, offering valuable insights for educators aiming to create engaging and impactful learning experiences in computer science and related fields.
References
Alabay, S., & Bastürk, M. (2021). Development, Implementation and Evaluation of E-Learning Materials for FFL with Adobe Captivate Software. International Education Studies, 14(6), 59–70.
Amali, L. N., Kadir, N. T., & Latief, M. (2019). Development of e-learning content with H5P and iSpring features. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 12019.
Anak Yunus, C. C., & Hua, T. K. (2021). Exploring a gamified learning tool in the ESL classroom: The case of Quizizz. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 103-108.
Anwar, M. S., Choirudin, C., Ningsih, E. F., Dewi, T., & Maseleno, A. (2019). Developing an interactive mathematics multimedia learning based on ispring presenter in increasing students’ interest in learning mathematics. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 135-150.
Azad, A., & Smith, D. T. (2014). Teaching an introductory programming language in a general education course. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 13, 57.
Bekk, M., Eppmann, R., Klein, K., & Völckner, F. (2022). All that glitters is not gold: An investigation into the undesired effects of gamification and how to mitigate them through gamification design. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(4), 1059–1081.
Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 5(1).
Berssanette, J. H., & de Francisco, A. C. (2021). Cognitive load theory in the context of teaching and learning computer programming: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 440–449.
Bottino, R., Chioccariello, A., & Freina, L. (2023). Developing Computational Fluency via Multimedia Stories. In Teaching Coding in K-12 Schools: Research and Application (pp. 63-79). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Boukhechba, H., & Bouhania, B. (2019). Adaptation of instructional design to promote learning in traditional EFL classrooms: Adobe Captivate for e-learning content. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(4), 151–164.
Dunican, E. (2002). Making the analogy: Alternative delivery techniques for first year programming courses.
Guzman, L. M., Pennell, M. W., Nikelski, E., & Srivastava, D. S. (2019). Successful integration of data science in undergraduate biostatistics courses using cognitive load theory. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar49.
Hadza, C., Sesrita, A., & Suherman, I. (2020). Development of Learning Media Based on Articulate Storyline. Indonesian Journal of Applied Research (IJAR), 1(2), 80–85.
Hanika, S., & Guspatni, G. (2023). Development of learning media powerpoint-iSpring integrated with prompting questions on stoichiometry topics. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 18(1), 57-64.
Haryana, M. R. A., Warsono, S., Achjari, D., & Nahartyo, E. (2022). Virtual reality learning media with innovative learning materials to enhance individual learning outcomes based on cognitive load theory. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100657.
Ibrahim, N. S., Hasmy, H., Kapi, A. Y., & Suhaimi, A. (2018). The Usability of C++ Interactive SelfAssessment Quiz (i-SAQ). International Journal of Human and Technology Interaction (IJHaTI), 2(2), 67–74.
Jiménez Toledo, J. A., Collazos, C. A., & Ortega, M. (2021). Discovery model based on analogies for teaching computer programming. Mathematics, 9(12), 1354.
Kapi, A. Y., Osman, N., Ramli, R. Z., Taib, J. M., & others. (2017). Multimedia education tools for effective teaching and learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(2–8), 143–146.
Korn, O. (2022). Gamification in industrial production: An overview, best practices, and design recommendations. Human-Technology Interaction: Shaping the Future of Industrial User Interfaces, 251–270.
Linn, A., & Rea, P. (2016). Undergraduate Medical Students as Active Participants and Co-Producers of E-Learning Tutorials.
Narayan, R., Rodriguez, C., Araujo, J., Shaqlaih, A., & Moss, G. (2013). Constructivism—Constructivist learning theory.
Neureiter, D., Klieser, E., Neumayer, B., Winkelmann, P., Urbas, R., & Kiesslich, T. (2020). Feasibility of Kahoot! as a real-time assessment tool in (histo-) pathology classroom teaching. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 695–705.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255.
Pavithra, A., Aathilingam, M., & Prakash, S. M. (2018). Multimedia and its applications. International Journal for Research & Development in Technology, 10(5), 271–276.
Rahmat, M., Shahrani, S., Latih, R., Yatim, N. F. M., Zainal, N. F. A., & Ab Rahman, R. (2012). Major problems in basic programming that influence student performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 287-296.
Ramli, R. Z., Kapi, A. Y., & Osman, N. (2015). Visualization makes array easy. Testing and Measurement:
Techniques and Applications - Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Testing and Measurement: Techniques and Applications, TMTA 2015.
Ramli, R. Z., Kapi, A. Y., & Osman, N. (2015, June). Visualization makes array easy. In Proceedings of
the 2015 International Conference on Testing and Measurement: Techniques and Applications (TMTA’15). CRC Press (pp. 381-384).
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., & Schworm, S. (2009). Example-based learning in heuristic domains: A cognitive load theory account. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 67–78.
Romisa, F. (2023). PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS ANDROID MENGGUNAKAN ISPRING SUITE PADA MATA PELAJARAN INFORMATIKA MATERI PERANGKAT KERAS KOMPUTER. Jurnal Ilmiah Sains Teknologi Dan Informasi, 1(2), 17-23.
Salleh, S. M., Shukur, Z., & Judi, H. M. (2018). Scaffolding model for efficient programming learning based on cognitive load theory. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math, 118(7), 77–83.
Shunkov, V., Shevtsova, O., Koval, V., Grygorenko, T., Yefymenko, L., Smolianko, Y., & Kuchai, O. (2022). Prospective Directions of Using Multimedia Technologies in the Training of Future Specialists. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(6), 739.
https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.93
Sorva, J., Karavirta, V., & Malmi, L. (2013). A review of generic program visualization systems for introductory programming education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 13(4), 1–64.
Swacha, J., & Szydłowska, J. (2023). Does Gamification Make a Difference in Programming Education? Evaluating FGPE-Supported Learning Outcomes. Education Sciences, 13(10), 984.
Theodoropoulos, A., & Lepouras, G. (2021). Augmented Reality and programming education: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 30, 100335.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.
Vikulova, L. G., Makarova, I. V., & Gerasimova, S. A. (2018). Features of iSpring suite learning platform for teaching foreign languages. Espacios, 39(20), 5-5.
Wang, C.-H., & Wu, K.-C. (2022). Interdisciplinary Learning of Low-Code Development Platform Programming with Dual Coding Theory-A Case Study of Agilepoint NX. Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, 21–25.
Wulf, T. (2005). Constructivist approaches for teaching computer programming. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education, 245–248.
Yunus, C. C. A., & Hua, T. K. (2021). Exploring a gamified learning tool in the ESL classroom: The case of Quizizz. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(1), 103–108.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Azyan Yusra Kapi@Kahbi, Azrina Suhaimi, Harshida Hasmy, Mohamad Faizal Ab Jabal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
