Evaluation of Students’ Engagement and Motivation to Participate in Virtual Events
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v22i1.1384Keywords:
Student Engagement, Motivation, Virtual Events, MESAbstract
The swift change of physical to online classes has significantly changed the educational landscape in the era of the new normal. The use of the Internet for online learning has soared significantly, and students are highly dependent on it by intensively and regularly attending classes. The development of online learning offers opportunities not only academic but also extracurricular activities such as virtual events to enhance students’ engagement and motivation in the online learning environment. By using electronic communication such as Google Meet and WhatsApp, students are able to interact and demonstrate their skills, knowledge and confidence in virtual events regardless of their geographical location. Consequently, students are able to feel motivated and engaged with other students and, thus, build up their morale to participate in virtual events. The purpose of this research is to explore the characteristics of students’ engagement and motivation across years of study and gender as factors affecting their participation in virtual student events. The Motivation and Engagement Scale (MES) was adapted, and quantitative analysis of descriptive statistics and an independent t-test were carried out. A simple random sampling of 122 undergraduate students from the construction management course completed the questionnaire. The findings show that overall, students are highly engaged and motivated to participate in virtual events. The research also revealed the underlying key factors of students’ engagement and motivation. The contribution of this research reveals that the transition to online learning, including virtual events facilitated by tools like Google Meet and WhatsApp, significantly enhances student engagement and motivation, providing key insights for improving online educational experiences.
References
Albelbisi, N., & Yusop, F. (2019). Factors influencing learners’ self –regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.598191
Barkley E.F. (2010) Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chan, S., Lin, C., Chau, P., Takemura, N., & Fung, J. (2021). Evaluating online learning engagement of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 104985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104985
Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000). Factors influencing the educational performance of males and females in school and their initial destinations after leaving school. A Project Funded by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 957-971.
Fisher, R., Per´enyi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. In: Active Learning in Higher Education.
Fredericks, J. and McColskey, W. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp.763-782.
Fredericks, J.A. and McColskey, W. (2014), “The measurement of student engagement: a comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments”, in Christenson, S.L. Reschly, A.L. and Wylie, C. et al. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Berlin, pp. 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.
Hersberger, J.A., Murray, A.L. and Rioux, K.S. (2007), Examining information exchange and virtual communities: an emergent framework, Online Information Review, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710747194
Laux, D., Luse, A., & Mennecke, B. (2016). Collaboration, connectedness, and community: An examination of the factors influencing student persistence in virtual communities. Computers In Human Behavior, 57, 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.046
Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
Kemp, N. and Grieve, R. (2014). “Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 1-11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019). A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British Journal Education Technology, 50, 2394–2413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12833
Kuh, G. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Liem, G., & Martin, A. (2012). The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical Framework, Psychometric Properties, and Applied Yields. Australian Psychologist, 47(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x
MacDonald, A., Saunders, L., & Benfield, P. (1999). Boys’ achievement progress, motivation and participation: Issues raised by the recent literature. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.
Martin, A.J. (2008). Motivation and engagement in diverse performance settings: Testing their generality across school, university/college, work, sport, music, and daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1607-1612.
Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic lifespan: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794-824.
Martin, A., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning And Individual Differences, 55, 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.013
Martin, A.J. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive-methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 785-813.
McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2005). The Shame of Failure: Examining the Link Between Fear of Failure and Shame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271420
Nedelko, Z. (2008). Participants’ Characteristics for E-Learning. E-Leader Conference.
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Parker, P., Perry, R., Hamm, J., Chipperfield, J., Pekrun, R., & Dryden, R. et al. (2021). A motivation perspective on achievement appraisals, emotions, and performance in an online learning environment. International Journal of Educational Research, 108, 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101772
Pintrich, P. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Reeve, J. and Tseng, C.-M. (2011), “Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 36, pp. 257-267.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Sum, C., Chan, I. & Wong, H. (2021), "Ready to learn in an uncertain future: ways to support student engagement", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2020-0220
Wigfield, A., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Eccles, J. (2017). Achievement values: Interactions, interventions, and future directions. In A. Elliot, C. Dweck, & D. Yeager (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology (13th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637
Yin, H. (2018) What motivates Chinese undergraduates to engage in learning? Insights from a psychological approach to student engagement research. High Educ 76, 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0239-0
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement. Language Teaching Research, 136216882095702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sheikh Ali Azzran Sh Said, Farrah Norizzah Mohd Yussof, Shaza Rina Sahamir, Julitta Yunos, Mohd Afzan @ Noorawavi Mohamed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International