Heritage Revitalisation Strategy: The Saviour of Petaling Street
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v21iSpecial%20Issue.2189Keywords:
Image and Identity, Heritage Revitalisation Strategy, Heritage RevitalisationAbstract
In revitalising heritage cities, Ross (2024) criticised the dominancy of urban preservation and management in cities that focus more on tangible than intangible heritage. The urban law highlighted that ‘image and identity’ are essential to represent a morphology and tangible and intangible heritage of specific urban avenues. Xiang & Mohamad (2023) unveiled that the front and back of heritage shophouses at Petaling Streets are adaptive usage. Heritage Revitalisation Stragey (HRS) is not new to Canadian, European, Middle Eastern, Chinese and Russian cities, which the tangible and intangible heritage treasures are valued equally in a strategic approach. This study evaluates the existing Heritage Revitalisation Strategy (RS) dedicated for the local authority of Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) and the Think City in valorising the heritage street of Petaling. Even though various methods were implemented in most heritage streets in Kuala Lumpur which were not successful, therefore a remarkable approach of HRS shall be tested to Petaling Street to groom the public place’s ambience. This research aims to identify the best approach applicable to urban heritage streets globally that is applicable urban heritage streets in Kuala Lumpur. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with the heritage manager of Kuala Lumpur City Hall and Think City’s personnel, visual observations, digital photo analysis, and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with shop owners were applied to establish a balanced strategy between the existing HRS and the Petaling Street’s version. Valorising the intangible and tangible built heritage as daily practices of the local street community as part of the street culture. Still, a proper Heritage Revitalisation Strategy (HRS) is urgently required specifically for our urban heritage street. Understanding this rare strategy for transforming into the street is critical in valorising its value. A proper RS by the DBKL management to further elevate its function as a tourist boosting factor is a catalyst for other avenues.
References
Alshallaqi, M. (2024). The complexities of digitisation and street-level discretion: a socio-materiality perspective. Public Management Review, 26(1), 25-47.
Amir, S., Azizan, A., Zahari, R. K., & Asmawi, M. Z. (2020). Urban public space as social interaction space: A case study in Petaling Street. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management, 5(19), 90-101.
Bieda, A., & Maniak, W. (2024). The Effect of Revitalisation on the Value of Residential Premises in Historic Urban Layouts. Real Estate Management and Valuation.
Chapin, F. S. & Knapp, C. N. (2015). ‘Sense of place: A process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability’, Environmental Science & Policy, 53(A), pp. 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.012.
Chua, S., & Ahmad, Y. (2021). Fronting the Back Lane of Heritage Street: Case Study of Petaling Street. Planning Malaysia, p. https://rb.gy/wst55
Eaton, W.M., F.R. Eanes, J.D. Ulrich-Schad, M.E. Burnham, S.P. Church, J.G. Arbuckle, and J.E. Cross. (2019). The trouble with sense of place in working landscapes. Society and Natural Resources. 32(7), 827-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1568653
Farelnik, E. (2021). Revitalisation is a tool for developing a slow city (Cittaslow). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 169-185.
Garau, C., Annunziata, A., & Yamu, C. (2024) determined on walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the Iglesias, Italy case study. European Planning Studies, 32(2), 211-233.
Grodach, C., & Ehrenfeucht, R. (2015). Urban Revitalisation: Remaking cities in a changing world. Routledge.
Haktanir, M., & Gullu, E. (2024). Place attachment in coffee shops: a customer perspective study in North Cyprus. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(1), 312-328.
Harrison, R. & Rose, D. (2010). ‘Intangible Heritage’, Benton, T. (ed.) Understanding heritage and memory (Understanding Global Heritage). Manchester and Milton Keynes: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University, pp. 238–276. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/776665/Intangible_Heritage.
Hasibuan, H. S., Koestoer, R. H., Permana, C. T., Elizandri, B. N., Danial, M. H., & Abdullah, J. (2024). Transport Policies, Transit-Oriented And Development Redistribution Of Population In Peri-Urban: Lessons From Kuala Lumpur And Jakarta Metropolitan Area. Planning Malaysia, 22.
Kim, J. (2019). Designing multiple urban spaces: an actor-network theory analysis on diversity and stability of public space. Journal of Urban Design, 24(2), 249-268.
Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Roders, A. P., & Van Wesemael, P. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96, 102476.
Locke, T. (2023). Sense of Place and Identity. In Sense of Place, Identity and the Revisioning of Curriculum (pp. 43-71). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
McCarthy, J. (2005). Promoting image and identity in ‘cultural quarters’: the case of Dundee. Local Economy, 20(3), 280-293.
McClinchey, K. A. (2016). ‘Conceptualising Sense of Place through Multi-ethnic Narratives at a Multicultural Festival’, Tourism Travel and Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally, 2. Available at: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2011/Student/2.
Mishra, M., & Lourenço, P. B. (2024). Artificial intelligence-assisted visual inspection for cultural heritage: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 66, 536-550.
Nedučin, D., Krklješ, M., & Gajić, Z. (2019). Post-socialist context of culture-led urban regeneration–A case study of a street in Novi Sad, Serbia. Cities, 85, 72-82.
Pallasmaa, J. (2024). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage in tourism: Research review and investigation of future agenda. Land, 11(1), 139.
Rifaioglu, M. N. and Şahin Guchan, N. (2013). ‘Property Rights as a Source for Identifying and Conserving the Spirit of Place’, Megaron, 8(3), pp. 137–148. https://doi.org/10.5505/MEGARON.2013.61687.
Ross, S. (2024). Finding the Intangible: Contested Cityscapes, Inclusive Cultural Heritage Determinations, Balancing Stakeholder Interests… Is Urban Property Law Up to the Challenge? In Heritage in War and Peace: Legal and Political Perspectives for Future Protection (pp. 19-33). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Samadi, Z., Yunus, R. M., & Omar, D. (2011). Evaluating Revitalizing Toolkit towards a Quality Heritage Street Establishment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.131
Samadi, Z., & Yunus, R. M. (2012). Conflict of image and identity in heritage commercialisation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 675-684.
Samadi, Z., & Yunus, R. M. (2018). Urban Heritage Streets' Revitalizing Attributes. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 3(6), 191-199.
Samadi, Z., Bakri, A. F., Mohamed, E., Mohamad Salman, & Haidar, L. (2022). Third Millennium Approach for Revitalizing Heritage Outdoor Space. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(22), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i22.4176
Swensen, G., Jerpåsen, G. B., Sæter, O., & Tveit, M. S. (2013). ‘Capturing the Intangible and Tangible Aspects of Heritage: Personal versus Official Perspectives in Cultural Heritage Management’, Landscape Research, 38(2), pp. 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.642346
Swensen, G., & Granberg, M. (2024). The Impact of Images on the Adaptive Reuse of Post-Industrial Sites. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 1-29.
Tucker, H. & Carnegie, E. (2014). ‘World heritage and the contradictions of “universal value”’, Annals of Tourism Research, 47, pp. 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.04.003
Tunbridge, J. E. & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Viola, S. (2022). Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges. Sustainability, 14(4), 2320.
Wang, Z., Liu, W., Sun, Z., & Zhao, H. (2024). Understanding the world heritage sites’ brand diffusion and formation via social media: a mixed-method study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(2), 602-631.
Xiang, T. H., & Mohamad, D. (2023). The effect of placemaking attributes on tourism experiences: a case study of Petaling Street in Malaysia. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21.
Zhang, S. N., Li, Y. Q., Liu, C. H., & Ruan, W. Q. (2019). How authenticity enhances flow experience through perceived value and involvement: the moderating roles of innovation and cultural identity. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(6), 710-728.
Zhang, X., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2024). Identifying modes of managing urban heritage: Results from a systematic literature review. City, Culture and Society, 36, 100560.
Zukin, S. (2012). The social production of urban cultural heritage: Identity and ecosystem on an Amsterdam shopping street. City, Culture and Society, 3(4), 281-291.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-01-2025 (2)
- 31-12-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zalina Samadi, Aidatul Fadzlin Bakri, Saidatul Haziah Ramli, Mariam Felani Azhari, Laila Haider
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International