Integrating Biophilic Design in Multi-Generational Housing: A Conceptual Framework for Enhancing Well-Being and Quality of Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v22iSI.6498Keywords:
Multi-Generational Housing, Well-Being, Quality of Life (QoL), Scoping ReviewAbstract
This paper explores the integration of biophilic design principles into multi-generational housing environments to enhance the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of residents in Malaysia. Through biophilic design, the study aims to develop a conceptual framework that identifies key factors contributing to improved mental health, reduced stress, and overall QoL in multi-generational households. Adopted a scoping review methodology, using secondary data from the existing literature published between 2019 and 2024 to build the framework. The analysis consisted of a concept matrix to collate the data that has been collected and determine the key drivers of housing environment preference along with the sub-factors. Overall, the findings suggest that biophilic design elements like natural light, ventilation, green spaces and views of nature greatly contribute to residents' wellbeing across generations. Additionally, the research also discovered that Generation Alpha, Millennials, Generation X and Baby Boomers have such different needs which means spaces must be built for them all. The conceptual framework therefore provides a pragmatic guide that targets improved QoL by integrating biophilic principles in the design of multi-generational housing to alleviate stress, which is detrimental to mental health, among residents. This framework should help architects, urban planners and policymakers working towards healthier and more sustainable living environments.
References
Attia, S., Farghaly, K., & Strickland, S. (2021). Sustainable material selection in biophilic design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125-187.
Bauman, K. A., & Brown, R. D. (2021). Millennials and nature: Exploring generational differences in perceptions of biophilic design. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101-218.
Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2020). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.001
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2022). The relationship between nature connectedness and well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101-235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2020). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 62, 102-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007
Chan, E. H. W., & Marafa, L. M. (2022). Community engagement in urban park planning: The role of cultural ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(2), 343-361.
Chen, F., Liu, Y., & Yang, D. (2020). Preferences for biophilic design features in urban green spaces among Generation X and Millennials. Sustainability, 12(12), 4996.
Choi, A. (2020). Daylighting and its impact on the quality of life in residential buildings. Buildings, 10(3), 56.
Duchhart, I., Bolund, P., & Chen, S. (2020). Participatory design in urban green spaces: Lessons from community-based urban gardening. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, 103-292.
Feng, X., & Shi, S. (2021). Biophilic design: Enhancing mental health in urban environments. Journal of Urban Health, 98(5), 751-762.
Gandhi, A.; Sucahyo, Y.G.; Ruldeviyani, Y. (2018) Investigating the Protection of Customers Personal Data in the Ridesharing Applications: A Desk Research in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Chiang Rai, Thailand, 18–21 July 2018; pp. 118–121
Genc, Z. (2021). Generation Alpha: The children of the millennial parents. In The New Generations (pp. 109-127). Springer.
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2019). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228.
Ismail, H., & Shaari, S. M. (2020). The location, house, or neighbourhood choice preferences among Malaysian housing generations. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 11(2), 64-74.
Ismail, H., Abidin, A. W. Z., Ling, N. L. F. J., Afif, A. S., & Siahaan, E. (2023). Factors Affecting Place Attachment and Types of Living Arrangement Preferences for Ageing in place of the Malaysian Generational Housing Consumers in Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(5), 185-195.
Ismail, H., & Shaari, S. M. (2019). Housing decision: the choice between location, house and neighbourhood among Malaysian generations. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 266, p. 01026). EDP Sciences.
Ismail, H., Halil, F. M., Abidin, A. W. Z., & Hasim, M. S. (2020). Ageing in Place or Late Life Move? The Malaysian elderly generation housing options. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 5(18), 1-17.
Ismail, H., Nordin, M. S. A., Halil, F. M., & Khalid, N. H. A. (2023). The Elderly Quality of Life (E-QoL) And Retirement Village Preferred Features by Malaysian Generations. Planning Malaysia, 21.
Kent, M. (2021). The impact of daylight exposure on sleep patterns and mood in urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101-220.
Kwok, J., Lee, T. M. C., & Leung, K. (2021). The effect of environmental factors on older adults’ mental health and well-being. Journal of Aging Studies, 57, 100-945.
Liu, H., Duan, H., & Zhao, Y. (2022). The health benefits of urban green spaces for older adults: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127-242.
Loder, A. (2022). Biophilic urbanism: A comparative study of the impacts of nature on human well-being in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127-243.
Lombardini, C., Coppola, L., & Viviani, M. (2020). Millennials and the built environment: Trends in preferences for housing and urban spaces. Sustainability, 12(15), 6092.
Luttik, J., Sijtsma, F., & Arisz, T. (2022). Connecting nature and technology: The role of smart technologies in engaging children with urban nature. Cities, 123, 103-248.
Menatti, L., & Casado da Rocha, A. (2021). Biophilic design and the well-being of elderly people: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, 101-221.
Neale, R. & Fuller, R. (2020). Stress reduction and the biophilic quality of built environments: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101-238.
Newton, D., & Tucker, A. (2019). Preferences for nature contact among Generation X. Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA), 50, 123-145.
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C. (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18, 143
Pereira, G., Foster, S., & McCune, S. (2019). The impact of sustainable materials on residents' well-being: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2763.
Raji, B., Tenpierik, M., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2021). The impact of indoor plants on the indoor environment and occupants’ well-being. Building and Environment, 179, 106-992.
Salama, A. M., Wiedmann, F., & Ibrahim, H. (2021). Inclusive design in urban environments: The case of Qatar. International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(3), 605-624.
Ryan, C.O.; Browning, W.D. Biophilic design. Sustain. Built Environ. 2020, 43–85.
Tan, Y., Wang, J., & Lin, Y. (2021). Biophilic design and quality of life in residential environments: A survey in China. Sustainability, 13(8), 4192.
Van den Berg, M. M. H. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2022). Nature and stress recovery: A systematic review of the evidence. Environmental Research Letters, 17(4), 043-305.
Vyas, A., & Satsangi, A. (2021). Designing for diversity: Multi-generational housing in urban areas. Journal of Urban Design, 26(5), 580-595.
Wong, N. H., Tan, C. L., & Tan, P. Y. (2021). Integrated biophilic design for sustainable urban living. Journal of Green Building, 16(1), 203-222.
Yuen, B., & Wong, F. (2020). Aging in place in multi-generational homes: The case of Singapore. Cities, 102, 102-287.
Yuen, B., Yeh, A. G. O., Appold, S. J., & Zhai, F. (2018). High-density living in Asian cities: Challenges and opportunities. Habitat International, 82, 23-30.
Zhang, Y., & Tang, Z. (2021). Viewing nature scenes reduces stress and improves cognitive performance: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101-248.
Zhong, W., Schröder, T. and Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review', Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), pp. 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
Zhao, X., & Pan, W. (2022). Biophilic design and well-being in urban environments: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(7), 4897-4908.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Che Muhamad Hanif Che Wil , Hafiszah Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
