A qualitative risk assessment for ammonium nitrate facilities: Correlating to historical data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/mjcet.v8i2.8672Keywords:
Risk Assessment, Ammonium Nitrate, Fertilizer plant, HAZOP, Process safety managementAbstract
The commercial fertiliser industry produces five primary chemicals which include phosphate, ammonia, urea, ammonium nitrate (AN), and nitric acid. The AN is widely used in agriculture but has been associated with numerous accidents due to inadequate post-accident investigations and management. A qualitative risk assessment is crucial for identifying and managing risks in such hazardous industries. This research demonstrates the application of a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) method, specifically the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), using Microsoft Excel. This research analyses AN manufacturing process facility located in the United States (US) as the US is a major global producer and consumer of AN and plays a significant role in the fertiliser and industrial explosives supply chain. The selected study nodes include raw material production unit, the product processing neutraliser, and AN storage unit. The key elements of the HAZOP study, including guide words, process parameters, causes, consequences, safeguards, risk ratings, and recommendations, were documented in Microsoft Excel. A total of eighteen deviations were identified, with the highest overall risk associated with the product processing neutraliser. In the manuscript, further discussion is focused primarily on the neutraliser, as it was identified as the highest risk. Historical accident data showed that the transportation unit had the highest accident frequency, alongside storage and manufacturing. The HAZOP methodology proved effective for identifying potential hazards and improving safety in AN facility. This approach allows the process safety management team to proactively address operational problems and enhance overall industry safety.
References
Babrauskas, V. (2016). Explosions of ammonium nitrate fertilizer in storage or transportation are preventable accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 304, 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.040
da Ponte Jr, G. P. (2021). Chapter 7 - Reducing unpredictability. In G. P. da Ponte Jr (Ed.), Risk Management in the oil and gas industry (pp. 307–383). Gulf Professional Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823533-1.00003-4
Ettouney, R. S., & El-Rifai, M. A. (2012). Explosion of ammonium nitrate solutions, two case studies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 90(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.07.007
Gil, J., Boncan, G., & Hughes, B. (2014, March 17–19). Bow tie and job hazard analysis: A case study to communicate the barrier philosophy as it relates to process safety in well operations [Paper presentation]. SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment, California, USA. https://doi.org/ 10.2118/168516-MS
Khan, F.I. and Amyotte, P. (2016). Safety and Risk Management of Chemical Processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Lee, C., Lee, K. C., Kim, H. Y., Kim, M. N., Choi, E. K., Kim, J. S., Lee, W. S., Lee, M. J., & Kim, H. T. (2013). Unidirectional valve malfunction by the breakage or malposition of disc -two cases report. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 65(4), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.337
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2013). Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals (29 CFR 1910.119). U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
Penelas, A. de J., & Pires, J. C. M. (2021). HAZOP analysis in terms of safety operations processes for oil production units: A case study. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10210. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110210
Puello-Mendez, J., Benedetti-Marquez, E.B., Sanchez-Forero, D.I., Suarez-Urbina, A.J., Rodriguez-Urbina, D.P. and Gracia-Rojas, J. (2018). Analysis of operational risks in the storage of liquid ammonium nitrate in a petrochemical plant, through the HAZOP methodology. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 67, 883–888. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1867148.
Prime, R., Mcintyre, M., & Reeves, D. (2008). Implementation of an Improved Safe Operating Envelope. In IYNC (Vol. 408, Issue 408).
Shakoor, A., Shahzad, S. M., Farooq, T. H., & Ashraf, F. (2020). Future of ammonium nitrate after Beirut (Lebanon) explosion. Environmental Pollution, 267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115615
Tariq, Z. (2022). Port of Beirut — lessons from the ammonium nitrate explosion that devastated the peninsula. Loss Prevention Bulletin, 284, pp. 2–6. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, UK.
Tiusanen, R. (2018). Qualitative Risk Analysis. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2024). Fertilizer Manufacturing Effluent Guidelines. Washington, DC: USEPA.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (n.d.). AP-42, Chapter 8.3: Ammonium Nitrate. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Wang, L., & Bu, L. (2023). A practical method for predicting and analyzing the consequences of ammonium nitrate explosion accidents adjacent to densely populated areas. Heliyon, 9(5), e15616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15616
Yue, Y., Gai, W., & Boustras, G. (2023). Exploration of the causes of ammonium nitrate explosions: Statistics and analysis of accidents over the past 100 years. Safety Science, 158, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105954
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mimi Nur Farrahida Ahmad Sabri, Rafeqah Raslan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
